Hi,
From my personal recent experience, I can tell you that processing a lot of
echo's thru classes is a heck of a lot slower than just doing it the normal
way. Although I wouldn't have done this particular project any other way, I
do with that I could get it to display faster. Its not a
"Joe Stump" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sure ...
>
> I'm of the belief that OOP (in PHP anyways) has great use for core
> libraries. Core libraries, by their nature, generally don't output HTML.
> It's a core libraries job to separate logic and presentation. How po
rsions of our
> online catalog.
>
> --Joe
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Johnson, Kirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 8:21 AM
> To: 'Joe Stump'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: PHP OOP x Procedural Performance
>
; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: PHP OOP x Procedural Performance
> One thing I'd like to abundantly point out is that NOT
> EVERYTHING BELONGS IN
> OOP! For instance, if you're building classes that output
> HTML - you've
> skipped a few chapters in y
> One thing I'd like to abundantly point out is that NOT
> EVERYTHING BELONGS IN
> OOP! For instance, if you're building classes that output
> HTML - you've
> skipped a few chapters in your OOP design books.
Joe,
I am curious about this opinion, could you elaborate a bit, please? I am not
an OO
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 8:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP OOP x Procedural Performance
"William N. Zanatta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> It is a known issue that function calls are expensive for
"William N. Zanatta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> It is a known issue that function calls are expensive for the processor.
>
> The OOP let us better organize the code but, thinking in function (or
> method) calls it may be more expensive than in the procedural
7 matches
Mail list logo
