tedd wrote:
Rob:
If I could understand what the Hell you are talking about, I'd be a
better programmer.
You're a bit like Einstein talking to a bunch of High School Physics
Teachers. We nod our collective heads thinking "huh?" while hoping
there isn't going to be a test.
If you want me to
At 10:00 AM -0400 5/11/10, Robert Cummings wrote:
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
i did gander at robs template system in interjinn once, but never got my
head wrapped round it; honestly i only gave it a day or so. i prefer to go
the typical route as per above, and omit the bloat that systems like smarty,
At 1:34 AM -0600 5/11/10, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
-snip-
if theres one thing i tend to stay away from, or start deleting the second i
inherit a new codebase, its smarty.
ive never seen anything more bloated & ridiculous. hey, lets all learn
*another* set of conventions & syntax on top of what we've
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
i did gander at robs template system in interjinn once, but never got my
head wrapped round it; honestly i only gave it a day or so. i prefer to go
the typical route as per above, and omit the bloat that systems like smarty,
savant etc bring to the table.
nothing personal da
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:19 PM, David McGlone wrote:
On Monday 10 May 2010 22:15:44 Paul M Foster wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 06:09:00PM -0400, David McGlone wrote:
On Monday 10 May 2010 13:04:36 richard gray wrote:
On 10/05/2010 18:17, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
It mak
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:19 PM, David McGlone wrote:
> On Monday 10 May 2010 22:15:44 Paul M Foster wrote:
> > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 06:09:00PM -0400, David McGlone wrote:
> > > On Monday 10 May 2010 13:04:36 richard gray wrote:
> > > > On 10/05/2010 18:17, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > > > > It
-Original Message-
From: richard gray [mailto:r...@richgray.com]
Sent: 10 May 2010 07:05 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP Application Structre
On 10/05/2010 18:17, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> It makes sense sometimes to have different files for different
> sections of a website. For e
Paul M Foster wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:37:21PM -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
Paul M Foster wrote:
Lots of people use templating systems and particularly Smarty. Here's
the difference between a templating system and just hand-coding:
Hand coding--
Templating system:
(Okay, I
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:37:21PM -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
> Paul M Foster wrote:
>>
>> Lots of people use templating systems and particularly Smarty. Here's
>> the difference between a templating system and just hand-coding:
>>
>> Hand coding--
>>
>>
>>
>> Templating system:
>>
>>
>>
>
Paul M Foster wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 06:09:00PM -0400, David McGlone wrote:
On Monday 10 May 2010 13:04:36 richard gray wrote:
On 10/05/2010 18:17, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
It makes sense sometimes to have different files for different sections
of a website. For example, blog.php, galle
On Monday 10 May 2010 22:15:44 Paul M Foster wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 06:09:00PM -0400, David McGlone wrote:
> > On Monday 10 May 2010 13:04:36 richard gray wrote:
> > > On 10/05/2010 18:17, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > > > It makes sense sometimes to have different files for different
> > >
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 06:09:00PM -0400, David McGlone wrote:
> On Monday 10 May 2010 13:04:36 richard gray wrote:
> > On 10/05/2010 18:17, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > > It makes sense sometimes to have different files for different sections
> > > of a website. For example, blog.php, gallery.php,
On Monday 10 May 2010 13:04:36 richard gray wrote:
> On 10/05/2010 18:17, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > It makes sense sometimes to have different files for different sections
> > of a website. For example, blog.php, gallery.php, cart.php could deal
> > with the blog, gallery and shopping cart section
On 10/05/2010 18:17, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
It makes sense sometimes to have different files for different sections
of a website. For example, blog.php, gallery.php, cart.php could deal
with the blog, gallery and shopping cart sections for an artists
website. Yes, it could all be achieved with on
On 10 May 2010 18:17, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>
>
>>
>> 3} Unless the site is small and has few pages and applications, it is almost
>> impossible to maintain.
>>
>
> I disagree here. As long as there are useful naming conventions for all
> of the files (I've seen projects where files have been nam
On 5/10/2010 12:17 PM, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
3} Unless the site is small and has few pages and applications, it is almost
impossible to maintain.
I disagree here. As long as there are useful naming conventions for all
of the files (I've seen projects where files have been named 1.php,
2
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 05:17:16PM +0100, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>
>
> >
> > 3} Unless the site is small and has few pages and applications, it
> is almost
> > impossible to maintain.
> >
>
> I disagree here. As long as there are useful naming conventions for all
> of the files (I've seen proje
>
> 3} Unless the site is small and has few pages and applications, it is almost
> impossible to maintain.
>
I disagree here. As long as there are useful naming conventions for all
of the files (I've seen projects where files have been named 1.php,
2.php, etc. I wanted to bloody kill the deve
On 5/10/2010 6:39 AM, Alex Major wrote:
Greetings all,
This question basically surrounds how you structure your PHP applications,
whether it changes depending on what you're doing and which you'd favour. I
have a feeling it'll come down to a question of personal taste, but on the
off-chance
19 matches
Mail list logo
