Joshua Beall wrote:
"Rasmus Lerdorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joshua Beall wrote:
I am doing some work where I want to do locking, and prevent scripts from
running in parallel. I see that I could use the semaphore mechanism, but
I'd like for my code to be por
> The problem I am having is that people are double-submitting certain
> transactions. My first attempt to prevent this was to store a flag in the
> session record indicating whether or not certain transactions had been
> completed, but this turned out to be insufficient at times because users
On 24 Mar 2005 Joshua Beall wrote:
> I realized that this sort of problem would always exist unless I had some
> sort of semaphore mechanism. Once a user has *started* a transaction, they
> need to be prevented from initiating a second transaction until the first
> transaction has been complet
"Rasmus Lerdorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Joshua Beall wrote:
>> I am doing some work where I want to do locking, and prevent scripts from
>> running in parallel. I see that I could use the semaphore mechanism, but
>> I'd like for my code to be portable, and
4 matches
Mail list logo
