Re: [PHP] Re: DOMXML support should be added to PHP5

2004-07-25 Thread Scrumpy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian Stocker) wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: >> Looking at the two approaches, I preferred using DOMXML and as it was >> based on libxml2 & libxslt it seemed to be the better option. > > I don't get that. The new DOM and XSL extension is still based on > libxml2 and li

Re: [PHP] Re: DOMXML support should be added to PHP5

2004-07-25 Thread Christian Stocker
On 25 Jul 2004 12:34:15 -, Scrumpy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason Barnett) wrote in > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > Well you are right that if > > you used the old DOMXML functions in PHP4 that there is no clean way > > to move that code forward without rewriting / suppo

[PHP] Re: DOMXML support should be added to PHP5

2004-07-25 Thread Scrumpy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason Barnett) wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Well you are right that if > you used the old DOMXML functions in PHP4 that there is no clean way > to move that code forward without rewriting / supporting two > infrastructures. I'm not a core developer but my guess is that t

[PHP] Re: DOMXML support should be added to PHP5

2004-07-23 Thread Jason Barnett
Scrumpy wrote: Sorry for the repeated posts. I didn't know that they got queued awaiting confirmation of my email address :) Yeah, I was wondering about the reposts. Well you are right that if you used the old DOMXML functions in PHP4 that there is no clean way to move that code forward without

[PHP] Re: DOMXML support should be added to PHP5

2004-07-23 Thread Scrumpy
Sorry for the repeated posts. I didn't know that they got queued awaiting confirmation of my email address :) -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php