Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Craige Leeder wrote:
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Shawn McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Why are you using OOP? That's insane.
-Shawn
I believe that's a matter of opinion. Some people like OOP, others
don't. Why criticize the man because he likes to u
Craige Leeder wrote:
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Shawn McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why are you using OOP? That's insane.
-Shawn
I believe that's a matter of opinion. Some people like OOP, others
don't. Why criticize the man because he likes to use it? I like to use
i
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Craige Leeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Shawn McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Why are you using OOP? That's insane.
> >
> > -Shawn
>
> I believe that's a matter of opinion. Some people like OOP, others
> don't. Why cr
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Shawn McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why are you using OOP? That's insane.
>
> -Shawn
I believe that's a matter of opinion. Some people like OOP, others
don't. Why criticize the man because he likes to use it? I like to use
it as well.
Regards,
- Craige
Philip Thompson wrote:
Hi all. I have several classes. Within each class, a new class is
called. Is there a way to assign a function in a *deeper* class to be
called in the first class? Example to follow..
b = new B ();
// I want to do the following. This does not work, of course.
5 matches
Mail list logo