Excellent advice, thanks. I was using GD 1.6.2 :( so will sort this and try
again.
Mick
-Original Message-
From: Richard Archer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 April 2002 22:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] Poor results with GD
At 5:32 PM +0200 15/4/02, Sear, Mick
, 0, 0,
> $tn_width,$tn_height,$width,$height);
> ImageJpeg($dst, $path, $compression); //compression set to 85 here.
> ImageDestroy($src);
> ImageDestroy($dst);
>
> Mick
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Brampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 15 April 2002
age-
From: Andrew Brampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 April 2002 17:56
To: Sear, Mick; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] Poor results with GD
They looked ok to me, but I don't know what the orginals looked like.
But the problem might be that your JPeg quality is set lower than you
At 5:32 PM +0200 15/4/02, Sear, Mick wrote:
>Not sure if anyone else uses GD much, but I've been experimenting with it
>and PHP recently and I've found I get large file sizes and very 'aliased'
>graphics.
gd is the correct tool for your job. But there are some caveats.
You will need to be using
ssage -
From: "Sear, Mick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 4:32 PM
Subject: [PHP] Poor results with GD
> Not sure if anyone else uses GD much, but I've been experimenting with it
> and PHP recently and I've found I get lar
Not sure if anyone else uses GD much, but I've been experimenting with it
and PHP recently and I've found I get large file sizes and very 'aliased'
graphics.
Can anyone suggest a fix/ alternative?
You'll see what I mean if you look at www.msear.com/paintings/ where the
images are currently all g
6 matches
Mail list logo