Hello,
I have been reading docs and many are telling that persistent connections
are kept open indefinitely. But I found in PHP docs that it will not close
after script execution like requesting a page; so should it close after
the request is over?
So when exactly a persistent connection should
On 25 Oct 2013, at 12:51, Nibin V M wrote:
> Thank you for the quick response Stuart...one more doubt..at
> http://php.net/manual/en/features.persistent-connections.php they states
>
> =
> This means that when the same client makes a second request to the server, it
> may be served by
On 25 Oct 2013, at 11:10, Nibin V M wrote:
> I have been reading docs and many are telling that persistent connections
> are kept open indefinitely. But I found in PHP docs that it will not close
> after script execution like requesting a page; so should it close after
> the request is over?
>
gt; To: "php" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 5:11 PM
> Subject: [PHP] Persistent connections with mysql_pconnect()
>
>
> > On Tuesday 25 March 2003 09:02 am, "skate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > leaving the connection op
>
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 5:11 PM
Subject: [PHP] Persistent connections with mysql_pconnect()
> On Tuesday 25 March 2003 09:02 am, "skate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > leaving the connection open creates security questions,
> > and also leaves resources ope
On Tuesday 25 March 2003 09:02 am, "skate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> leaving the connection open creates security questions,
> and also leaves resources open, what if a user closes his
> browser window, how do you know to close the connection?
So are you saying that persistent connections [ i.
Lo all,
Is there anyway to "manage" persistent connections to MySQL?
I've started using them on various of my sites (mysql_pconnect instead of
mysql_connect - as in the documentation), but after a few hours, I notice
that the connections just keeps on getting more and more and more.
Eventually,
Frank Joerdens wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 11:01:14AM +, Nuno Silva wrote:
> [ . . . ]
>
>> i ran across this transaction problem vs. persistent conn in pgsql some time ago.
>>
>> I found two workaround methods:
>> - don't use persistent conn's :-) or;
>> - start every conn with the us
on 1/25/01 11:49 AM, Frank Joerdens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 04:04:24PM -0300, Martin A. Marques wrote:
> [ . . . ]
>> Of course. But the persistent connection are not working as the manuals say
>> they should work.
> It appears this riddle has been solved: From a po
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 11:01:14AM +, Nuno Silva wrote:
[ . . . ]
> i ran across this transaction problem vs. persistent conn in pgsql some time ago.
>
> I found two workaround methods:
> - don't use persistent conn's :-) or;
> - start every conn with the usual pg_pconnect and then query a ro
Frank Joerdens wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 05:10:54PM -0300, Martin A. Marques wrote:
> [ . . . ]
>
>> OK, lets see if we can understand what each other is saying (maybe I'm not
>> getting your point here).
>> Lets say browser A connects to the apache server, to a page using php code.
>>
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 05:10:54PM -0300, Martin A. Marques wrote:
[ . . . ]
> OK, lets see if we can understand what each other is saying (maybe I'm not
> getting your point here).
> Lets say browser A connects to the apache server, to a page using php code.
> Lets say the code is OK (no bugs).
El Jue 25 Ene 2001 16:49, Frank Joerdens escribió:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 04:04:24PM -0300, Martin A. Marques wrote:
> [ . . . ]
>
> > Of course. But the persistent connection are not working as the manuals
> > say they should work.
>
> It appears this riddle has been solved: From a post by Ada
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 04:04:24PM -0300, Martin A. Marques wrote:
[ . . . ]
> Of course. But the persistent connection are not working as the manuals say
> they should work.
It appears this riddle has been solved: From a post by Adam Lang on
pgsql-php on Dec 8:
Well, there's a problem with
El Jue 25 Ene 2001 14:34, Frank Joerdens escribió:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:18:49AM -0300, Martin A. Marques wrote:
> [ . . . ]
>
> > No, and thats why in the postgres list we talked about persistent
> > connections not having much benefits. That is because the connection is
> > persistent to
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:18:49AM -0300, Martin A. Marques wrote:
[ . . . ]
> No, and thats why in the postgres list we talked about persistent connections
> not having much benefits. That is because the connection is persistent to the
> httpd child that called it and not to all.
Well, yes, bu
El Jue 25 Ene 2001 10:21, Frank Joerdens escribió:
> On the PostgreSQL lists there has been some discussion recently as to
> the mechanism behind, benefits and drawbacks, of persistent connections.
> In particular a scenario similar to the following was brought up:
>
> Browser A connects to Apache
On the PostgreSQL lists there has been some discussion recently as to
the mechanism behind, benefits and drawbacks, of persistent connections.
In particular a scenario similar to the following was brought up:
Browser A connects to Apache child N, and calls a web page that calls a
script which iss
18 matches
Mail list logo
