gt; Phone: (671)689-2377
> -Original Message-
> From: Stut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 2:55 AM
> To: tedd
> Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP5 & Commercial Development
>
> tedd wrote:
>> At 12:06
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 09:47 +0100, Lars Gunther wrote:
> Robert Cummings skrev:
> > On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 23:45 +0100, Keryx Web wrote:
> > Could you point out to me where exactly the discussion became about PHP4
> > versus PHP5? I seem to be smelling the red herring technique of changing
> > the c
Robert Cummings skrev:
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 23:45 +0100, Keryx Web wrote:
Could you point out to me where exactly the discussion became about PHP4
versus PHP5? I seem to be smelling the red herring technique of changing
the conversation focus so as to inappropriately lend credence to the
initial
2:55 AM
To: tedd
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP5 & Commercial Development
tedd wrote:
> At 12:06 AM -0500 2/5/07, Craige Leeder wrote:
>> PHP is fine for commercial environments. Many people are just afraid
>> of it due to the fact it is known to break some
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 23:45 +0100, Keryx Web wrote:
>
> The question PHP 4 or PHP 5: If you stay with 4 you are bound to a one
> size fits all solution. In PHP 5 you can use DB-specific drivers or PDO
> or a PHP-based abstraction layer. That's *more* choice, not less!
>
> To summarize: With PDO
Robert Cummings skrev:
I sincerely question the competence of someone who advocates a one size
fits all approach to programming. There are many reasons why a developer
may work with the old-school interface calls. For instance they may be
supporting an old school application. They might be writin
On Mon, February 5, 2007 10:55 am, Stut wrote:
> tedd wrote:
>> At 12:06 AM -0500 2/5/07, Craige Leeder wrote:
>>> PHP is fine for commercial environments. Many people are just
>>> afraid
>>> of it due to the fact it is known to break some poorly written PHP
>>> 4
>>> scripts, and the fact that
Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 22:00 +0100, Keryx Web wrote:
>> Eric Gorr skrev:
>>> I haven't tracked this particular issue, but I know when PHP5 was first
>>> released is wasn't recommended in a commercial/production environment.
>>> However, a lot of time has passed and we're a
Stut wrote:
> tedd wrote:
>> At 12:06 AM -0500 2/5/07, Craige Leeder wrote:
>>> PHP is fine for commercial environments. Many people are just afraid
>>> of it due to the fact it is known to break some poorly written PHP 4
>>> scripts, and the fact that many people don't think it's new features
>>>
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 22:00 +0100, Keryx Web wrote:
> Eric Gorr skrev:
> > I haven't tracked this particular issue, but I know when PHP5 was first
> > released is wasn't recommended in a commercial/production environment.
> > However, a lot of time has passed and we're at v5.2 now...have things
Eric Gorr skrev:
I haven't tracked this particular issue, but I know when PHP5 was first
released is wasn't recommended in a commercial/production environment.
However, a lot of time has passed and we're at v5.2 now...have things
changed? Have Google&Yahoo, for example, moved to PHP5? Or is PHP
tedd wrote:
At 12:06 AM -0500 2/5/07, Craige Leeder wrote:
PHP is fine for commercial environments. Many people are just afraid
of it due to the fact it is known to break some poorly written PHP 4
scripts, and the fact that many people don't think it's new features
are "necessary". It is perfect
At 12:06 AM -0500 2/5/07, Craige Leeder wrote:
Eric,
PHP is fine for commercial environments. Many people are just afraid
of it due to the fact it is known to break some poorly written PHP 4
scripts, and the fact that many people don't think it's new features
are "necessary". It is perfectly fin
Eric,
PHP is fine for commercial environments. Many people are just afraid
of it due to the fact it is known to break some poorly written PHP 4
scripts, and the fact that many people don't think it's new features
are "necessary". It is perfectly fine to use it in a commercial
environment however.
On Thu, February 1, 2007 5:13 pm, Eric Gorr wrote:
> I haven't tracked this particular issue, but I know when PHP5 was
> first released is wasn't recommended in a commercial/production
> environment. However, a lot of time has passed and we're at v5.2
> now...have things changed? Have Google&Yahoo,
Eric Gorr wrote:
I haven't tracked this particular issue, but I know when PHP5 was first
released is wasn't recommended in a commercial/production environment.
However, a lot of time has passed and we're at v5.2 now...have things
changed? Have Google&Yahoo, for example, moved to PHP5? Or is PHP
AFAIK php5 is the preferred production/enterprise environment.
(buzzword +1)
Respectfully,
Ligaya Turmelle
-Original Message-
From: Eric Gorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 9:13 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP] PHP5 & Commercial Developmen
I haven't tracked this particular issue, but I know when PHP5 was
first released is wasn't recommended in a commercial/production
environment. However, a lot of time has passed and we're at v5.2
now...have things changed? Have Google&Yahoo, for example, moved to
PHP5? Or is PHP4 still the r
18 matches
Mail list logo
