On Friday, October 10, 2003, at 12:38 PM, Manisha Sathe wrote:
Thanks Justin, actually I was also thinking of the same, but just
wanted to
confirm that it is really not a good idea.
Was also wondering if there is any third party solution ?.
A third party solution to what??? I've described the
>Thanks Justin, actually I was also thinking of the same, but just wanted
>to confirm that it is really not a good idea.
>
>Was also wondering if there is any third party solution ?.
A third-party solution to a bad idea?
-
michal
Thanks Justin, actually I was also thinking of the same, but just wanted to
confirm that it is really not a good idea.
Was also wondering if there is any third party solution ?.
Regards
Manisha
"Justin French" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> This first rule is neve
This first rule is never trust the client-side.
The second rule is never trust the client-side.
This means that relying on...
a) the user accepting the cookie
b) the user always using the same computer
c) the user not deleting the cookie
... is a BAD idea.
Frankly, if you force me to use a single c
Hi,
I have a client. He does not want member login by just giving password and
login id. He says anybody can give this info to his friend and his friend
can access the site.
One way is to make use of cookie on his computer. So only from one computer
he can access the site. But the thing is that u
5 matches
Mail list logo