[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what is the point of stating this?
Never assume anything as being intuitive. Investigate the way people use
your interface and improve accordingly. If you implement a function that
requires the user to learn something tell him clearly that he has to learn
it first an
Hello
Now that the discussion is coming around to be more on topic I have some
stuff to add.
First and most important: There is no such thing as INTUITIVE when it
comes to interfaces.
Every interface built for human machine interaction has to be learned by
the human using it. So what we consi
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 13:50, Chris Shiflett wrote:
[snip]
> Some Web sites I have visited think it is helpful to use some client-side
> scripting to move the focus from the first text field to the second after
> three numbers have been entered. So, when the user hits tab after entering
> the first
Cesar Cordovez wrote:
> Chris Shiflett wrote:
>> Some Web sites I have visited think it is helpful to use some
>> client-side scripting to move the focus from the first text field to
>> the second after three numbers have been entered.
>
> I think this is the worst thing to do. If they are going
Chris Shiflett wrote:
Some Web sites I have visited think it is helpful to use some client-side
scripting to move the focus from the first text field to the second after
three numbers have been entered. So, when the user hits tab after entering
the first three numbers, the second text field is sk
--- Dave G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the over whelming majority of people expect a system to behave
> one way, that's not evidence that they are "brain dead", but that
> it's very likely the expected behaviour is more natural for people,
> and systems should match humans, not vice versa.
I w
6 matches
Mail list logo
