tedd wrote:
At 5:08 AM + 2/11/10, Jochem Maas wrote:
rgds,
Jochem
PS. from a semantics POV, Robert Cummings is, IMHO, spot on in his
assessment - I do enjoy
his posts, he's a sharp cookie with plenty to offer and I always
enjoy reading his
argumentation and opinion!
With the danger
At 5:08 AM + 2/11/10, Jochem Maas wrote:
rgds,
Jochem
PS. from a semantics POV, Robert Cummings is, IMHO, spot on in his
assessment - I do enjoy
his posts, he's a sharp cookie with plenty to offer and I always
enjoy reading his
argumentation and opinion!
With the danger of Rob becoming
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
If is not proper to use for this purpose, what would be?
suggests a particular type of layout.
suggests content.
is appropriate for some items in a side bar, but not all, and is
often a child of how is being used.
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 07:02 -0800, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > Michael A. Peters wrote:
> >> If is not proper to use for this purpose, what would be?
> >>
> >> suggests a particular type of layout.
> >> suggests content.
> >> is appropriate for some items in a side ba
Robert Cummings wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
If is not proper to use for this purpose, what would be?
suggests a particular type of layout.
suggests content.
is appropriate for some items in a side bar, but not all, and is
often a child of how is being used.
give no semantics.
I wou
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 09:39 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
> Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 01:44 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
> >> *haha* I've removed w3.org from the recipients list... so onwards to the
> >> content below...
> >>
> >>
> >> Jochem Maas wrote:
> >> > Op 2/10/10
Robert Cummings wrote:
I don't know about where you are, but Canadian government has very
specific guidelines on how content should be marked up... and semantic
use of tags is a clear part of that:
"The institution respects the universal accessibility
guidelines developed by the Wor
Michael A. Peters wrote:
If is not proper to use for this purpose, what would be?
suggests a particular type of layout.
suggests content.
is appropriate for some items in a side bar, but not all, and is
often a child of how is being used.
give no semantics.
I would like to see a tag fo
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 01:44 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
*haha* I've removed w3.org from the recipients list... so onwards to the
content below...
Jochem Maas wrote:
> Op 2/10/10 9:08 PM, Robert Cummings schreef:
>> From the editor's draft:
>>
>> "
>> The aside element
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 05:59 -0800, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> Michael A. Peters wrote:
> > If is not proper to use for this purpose, what would be?
>
> How about ??
>
To me margin says an area of space around the content. That's not to say
that content can't be put in a margin, but I just do
Michael A. Peters wrote:
If is not proper to use for this purpose, what would be?
How about ??
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
If is not proper to use for this purpose, what would be?
suggests a particular type of layout.
suggests content.
is appropriate for some items in a side bar, but not all, and is
often a child of how is being used.
give no semantics.
I would like to see a tag for nav that serves as a tab
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 01:44 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
> *haha* I've removed w3.org from the recipients list... so onwards to the
> content below...
>
>
> Jochem Maas wrote:
> > Op 2/10/10 9:08 PM, Robert Cummings schreef:
> >> From the editor's draft:
> >>
> >> "
> >> The aside element repr
*haha* I've removed w3.org from the recipients list... so onwards to the
content below...
Jochem Maas wrote:
Op 2/10/10 9:08 PM, Robert Cummings schreef:
From the editor's draft:
"
The aside element represents a section of a page that consists of
content that is tangentially related to the c
Op 2/10/10 9:08 PM, Robert Cummings schreef:
> From the editor's draft:
>
> "
> The aside element represents a section of a page that consists of
> content that is tangentially related to the content around the aside
> element, and which could be considered separate from that content. Such
> secti
From the editor's draft:
"
The aside element represents a section of a page that consists of
content that is tangentially related to the content around the aside
element, and which could be considered separate from that content. Such
sections are often represented as sidebars in printed typogr
16 matches
Mail list logo
