RE: [PHP] Frequent Mode Switching

Derrick Fogle on Tuesday, August 05, 2003 2:14 PM said: > I've found that I prefer programming this way, for the most part, > putting most of the heavy PHP programming at the top, and then using > static HTML interspersed mostly with quick statements > for what user

Re: [PHP] Frequent Mode Switching

o much. But if you are worried about readability, I would stick with the method myself. It keeps everything flowing in the script. Jim Lucas - Original Message - From: "Derrick Fogle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 2:13 PM S

Re: [PHP] Frequent Mode Switching

adability, I would stick with the ** ?> method myself. It keeps everything flowing in the script. > > Jim Lucas > > - Original Message - > From: "Derrick Fogle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 20

Re: [PHP] Frequent Mode Switching

On Tuesday 05 August 2003 05:13 pm, Derrick Fogle wrote: > Thoughts on frequent switching in and out of PHP mode: > > ?>Switch out, static HTML > ?>Switch out, more static HTML > > I've found that I prefer programming this way, for the most part, > putting most of the heavy PHP programming at the

[PHP] Frequent Mode Switching

Thoughts on frequent switching in and out of PHP mode: Switch out, static HTML Switch out, more static HTML I've found that I prefer programming this way, for the most part, putting most of the heavy PHP programming at the top, and then using static HTML interspersed mostly with quick statement