No problem mate :)
As a general rule, it seems that PHP just copied Java's OOP model - and
outside of the quirks in the way it works internally - it's a pretty damn
good implementation of object orientation. THe only issue I have with it is
that it's not possible to lose the procedural bootstrapp
That's containment, not inheritence, must have misread the email. Oops :)
The "easiest" way to do this would be something like:
class contrived {
private $parent;
private $otherparent;
public function __call($func, $params) {
if(is_callable(array($this->parent, $func))
call_user_func_array(arra
Eddie Drapkin wrote:
You can call methods from a classes's parents like so
class foo {
protected method bar() {
echo "in foo!";
}
}
class foobar extends foo {
public function bar() {
parent::bar();
}
}
$fb = new foobar();
$fb->bar(); will output "in foo!";
wrong way round.. he's asking f
You can call methods from a classes's parents like so
class foo {
protected method bar() {
echo "in foo!";
}
}
class foobar extends foo {
public function bar() {
parent::bar();
}
}
$fb = new foobar();
$fb->bar(); will output "in foo!";
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Stuart wrote:
2009/5/24 phphelp -- kbk :
If so, can the bar_handler->bar_toast() function call a function in the
container class (foo_handler)? "Parent" is used in some OOP languages for
this type of hierarchy, but not PHP. I have fooled around with the scope
resolution operator, but either that
2009/5/24 phphelp -- kbk :
> Hey -- folks -- -- -
>
> I am trying to figure out one aspect of PHP's object model.
>
> Is it good practice to have a class be a property of another class? In other
> words:
>
> class foo_handler {
> function add_bar() {
> include bar_class.inc;
>
Hey -- folks -- -- -
I am trying to figure out one aspect of PHP's object model.
Is it good practice to have a class be a property of another class?
In other words:
class foo_handler {
function add_bar() {
include bar_class.inc;
$this->bar_handler = ne
7 matches
Mail list logo
