Re: [PHP] .INC files

2005-06-03 Thread Peter Brodersen
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 00:44:12 -0400, in php.general [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Shiflett) wrote: >3. The debate between storing includes outside of document root versus >using a .php file extension, instructing Apache to process .inc files as >PHP, instructing PHP to deny requests for .inc files, et

Re: [PHP] .INC files

2005-06-02 Thread Jochem Maas
Richard Lynch wrote: On Wed, June 1, 2005 1:29 am, Denis Gerasimov said: Second, which way are you differ PHP .inc files from HTML .inc files? There is no such thing as an HTML .inc file. :-) All your HTML .inc files, by definition, if they are being require'd or include'd int

Re: [PHP] .INC files

2005-06-02 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
Rory Browne wrote: > Alternatively if the include_path, contained the path that your > includes were in, (and only the directory where you put your > includes), then php wouldn't have very far to search. Well, no real difference between that and just making sure most of your includes are in the f

Re: [PHP] .INC files

2005-06-02 Thread Rory Browne
> > I do not agree. Not agreeing with Rasmus on a PHP list, can be seriously damaging to your credability, unless you really know what you're talking about and have a solid argument. Having that said, I personally use .inc.php - .inc as Rasmus said, to denote include files, and .php because I co

RE: [PHP] .INC files

2005-06-02 Thread Denis Gerasimov
OK... Let me explain a couple things... > On Wed, June 1, 2005 1:29 am, Denis Gerasimov said: > > Second, which way are you differ PHP .inc files from HTML .inc files? > > There is no such thing as an HTML .inc file. :-) I see what you mean... but I use templating systems t

Re: [PHP] .INC files

2005-06-01 Thread Chris Shiflett
Richard Lynch wrote: Why risk the possibility of your code being exposed or executed out of context when it's so *EASY* to move the include files and set include_path? I just don't understand the resistance to such a simple straight-forward elegant security measure. For 5 minutes of time, you c

RE: [PHP] .INC files

2005-06-01 Thread Richard Lynch
On Wed, June 1, 2005 1:29 am, Denis Gerasimov said: > Second, which way are you differ PHP .inc files from HTML .inc files? There is no such thing as an HTML .inc file. :-) All your HTML .inc files, by definition, if they are being require'd or include'd into PHP *are* PHP .inc

Re: [PHP] .INC files

2005-06-01 Thread Jochem Maas
m all cool. cheers for that :-) Second, which way are you differ PHP .inc files from HTML .inc files? Many programs can't too... IMHO it is very inconvenient. Third, I always write context-independent include files. Objections? I'd say so. a, your disagreement is more like an amendme

RE: [PHP] .INC files

2005-06-01 Thread Denis Gerasimov
ay: Order allow,deny Deny from all Second, which way are you differ PHP .inc files from HTML .inc files? Many programs can't too... IMHO it is very inconvenient. Third, I always write context-independent include files. Objections? Thank you. Best regards, Denis Gerasimov, Chief

Re: [PHP] .INC files

2005-05-31 Thread Sebastian
they're usually used as includes, hence the "INC" part. files that have certain functions/classes that another script requires and people use them to split up the code. I don't and have never created .inc files.. all my files end in .php -- but that's just me. Martin Zvarik wrote: Hi, I s

Re: [PHP] .INC files

2005-05-31 Thread disguised.jedi
On 5/30/05, Martin Zvarik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I saw files like "file.inc.php" and "file.inc" > > What is the *.inc suffix good for ? > > Thank you for replies. > > Martin > > I think it means that the files were meant to be included...not called by themselves. I'm just guess

Re: [PHP] .INC files

2005-05-31 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
Martin Zvarik wrote: > Hi, > I saw files like "file.inc.php" and "file.inc" > > What is the *.inc suffix good for ? I don't see the point in file.inc.php, but file.inc is something I use all the time to indicate that a file is designed to be included and not accessed directly. Then I have an Ap

Re: [PHP] .INC files

2005-05-31 Thread John Nichel
Martin Zvarik wrote: Hi, I saw files like "file.inc.php" and "file.inc" What is the *.inc suffix good for ? Thank you for replies. Martin It doesn't matter. PHP will parse either if you call them via include() or require() I guess it just boils down to your preference. -- John C. Nich

[PHP] .INC files

2005-05-31 Thread Martin Zvarik
Hi, I saw files like "file.inc.php" and "file.inc" What is the *.inc suffix good for ? Thank you for replies. Martin

[PHP] .INC files

2005-05-31 Thread Martin Zvarik
Hi, I saw files like "file.inc.php" and "file.inc" What is the *.inc suffix good for ? Thank you for replies. Martin -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

[PHP] .inc files doubles up

2002-10-29 Thread Tine
This is really my first major PHP encounter, and I have attempted to modify a php form mail script to include a foot.inc and head.inc file, which works fine if all required fields in the form is filled out. But if there are more than 2 required fields missing I end up with what you see here: http:

[PHP] .inc files

2001-11-04 Thread Rudi Ahlers
Hi I was wondering, is there a different way using .inc files? I have a lot of .inc files, which are displayed as normal text when you call it in the browser. I would like to still have a file with the username / password / database / etc in, but make it say config.inc.php. How would I get the ap