Re: [PHP] was [PHP] Re: render html

Nathan Rixham a écrit : is an interesting one; and very rarely used Maybe because it isn't part of the normalized W3C markup languages ? -- Mickaël Wolff aka Lupus Michaelis http://lupusmic.org -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/uns

Re: [PHP] was [PHP] Re: render html

On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 10:15 -0500, Philip Thompson wrote: > And is just > not right at all (at least for XHTML I think you'll find that is valid XHTML, which just says that the closing tag must be specified. Ash www.ashleysheridan.co.uk -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To

Re: [PHP] was [PHP] Re: render html

Jim Lucas wrote: Philip Thompson wrote: Nothing ever goes between br tags! There should never be a "between" regarding a br tag is an interesting one; and very rarely used -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP] was [PHP] Re: render html

Philip Thompson wrote: > > Nothing ever goes between br tags! > There should never be a "between" regarding a br tag -- Jim Lucas "Some men are born to greatness, some achieve greatness, and some have greatness thrust upon them." Twelfth Night, Act II, Scene V by William Shakespe

Re: [PHP] was [PHP] Re: render html

On Sep 22, 2008, at 10:29 AM, tedd wrote: At 10:15 AM -0500 9/22/08, Philip Thompson wrote: And is just not right at all (at least for XHTML, and I doubt for any other doctype). You can look at the DTD for XHTML and see that is not an option. http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/04/valid-dtd-list.h

Re: [PHP] was [PHP] Re: render html

At 10:15 AM -0500 9/22/08, Philip Thompson wrote: And is just not right at all (at least for XHTML, and I doubt for any other doctype). You can look at the DTD for XHTML and see that is not an option. http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/04/valid-dtd-list.html ~Philip I never use the tag, but if

Re: [PHP] was [PHP] Re: render html

At 11:50 AM -0400 9/21/08, b wrote: I think this page explains the roots of the confusion very well: Empty elements in SGML, HTML, XML, and XHTML http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/html/empty.html It wasn't until I got to the bottom of the read that I realized Jukka wrote it -- I've known him for

Re: [PHP] was [PHP] Re: render html

On Sep 22, 2008, at 9:24 AM, tedd wrote: At 8:37 PM +0100 9/21/08, Stut wrote: That's what the DocType is. It tells the browser what version of (X)HTML you're using and therefore which tags are allowed and which are not. It has a major effect on some browsers, and if you use the right one

Re: [PHP] was [PHP] Re: render html

At 8:37 PM +0100 9/21/08, Stut wrote: That's what the DocType is. It tells the browser what version of (X)HTML you're using and therefore which tags are allowed and which are not. It has a major effect on some browsers, and if you use the right one it can help a lot when trying to make pages lo

Re: [PHP] was [PHP] Re: render html

On 21 Sep 2008, at 16:18, tedd wrote: At 4:06 PM +0100 9/21/08, Ashley Sheridan wrote: I'm sorry, I didn't mean to be insulting! I do agree that you will get those errors if you choose the wrong doctype, and by wrong I mean one that is mismatched with the types of tag you try to use. Maybe

Re: [PHP] was [PHP] Re: render html

tedd wrote: At 8:17 AM +0200 9/21/08, Lupus Michaelis wrote: Michelle Konzack a écrit : $body = "helloierhellohello"; ^ Should be Definitely no : Or ma

Re: [PHP] was [PHP] Re: render html

At 4:06 PM +0100 9/21/08, Ashley Sheridan wrote: I'm sorry, I didn't mean to be insulting! I do agree that you will get those errors if you choose the wrong doctype, and by wrong I mean one that is mismatched with the types of tag you try to use. Maybe I need to learn something here. Are you

Re: [PHP] was [PHP] Re: render html

On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 09:55 -0400, tedd wrote: > At 2:27 PM +0100 9/21/08, Ashley Sheridan wrote: > > > >You will only get the errors you describe if you've messed up the > >document type declaration. > > Ash, I know you don't mean to be insulting, but I didn't "mess up" my > DOCTYPE -- give me s

Re: [PHP] was [PHP] Re: render html

At 2:27 PM +0100 9/21/08, Ashley Sheridan wrote: You will only get the errors you describe if you've messed up the document type declaration. Ash, I know you don't mean to be insulting, but I didn't "mess up" my DOCTYPE -- give me some credit for knowing a little about this. I always use

Re: [PHP] was [PHP] Re: render html

On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 09:16 -0400, tedd wrote: > At 8:17 AM +0200 9/21/08, Lupus Michaelis wrote: > >Michelle Konzack a écrit : > >>>$body = "helloierhellohello"; > >> ^ > >> Should be > > > > Definitely no : > > > >

[PHP] was [PHP] Re: render html

At 8:17 AM +0200 9/21/08, Lupus Michaelis wrote: Michelle Konzack a écrit : $body = "helloierhellohello"; ^ Should be Definitely no : Or maybe for buggy