It's funny how talking or writing about something uncovers things you
didn't see before.
In an effort to tidy up the code I heeded the original implementors
comments and made the methods private (they were previously undeclared).
Making them public seems to have fixed the problem.
On 17/03/11 13:
My apologies. I've not seen something I should have earlier. Also the
instance that is behind all of this is and instance of
ActiveRecordFormClass.
So, in PHP4, the correct overridden method is called:
ActiveRecordFormClass::_dispatchSave().
In PHP5, the FormClass::_dispatchSave() is called...???
Hi,
I'm trying to decipher inherited code (I did not write this) and I'm
having great difficulty understanding the override of a method in PHP4
vs PHP5
Here's the code:
form.php
22 class FormClass
23 {
...
/* some method calls to _dispatchSave() */
572 if($this->_dispatch
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Robinson [mailto:tom.robin...@motec.com.au]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 4:03 PM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP] PHP4 to PHP5 migration with E_STRICT
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm migrating a web application writt
On 8 December 2010 01:12, Tom Robinson wrote:
> Thanks David.
>
> If my understanding is correct, then:
>
> SPControlPanel::getContentTypes($db);
>
> is a reference to a static instantiation of the class. If so, then it
> must be syntactically something like when using 'new' (which returns a
> ref
Thanks David.
If my understanding is correct, then:
SPControlPanel::getContentTypes($db);
is a reference to a static instantiation of the class. If so, then it
must be syntactically something like when using 'new' (which returns a
reference) so there's no need to apply the & operator. Am I on th
In getCategoryTypes() you're assigning a reference to the return value of
getContentTypes(), and PHP doesn't like that. You can return a reference to
a variable from a function, but taking the reference of a *value* is
meaningless since you can only create references to variables. Just remove
the &
Hi,
I'm migrating a web application written for PHP4 to PHP5. I've turned on
E_STRICT to have a detailed look at all the code thoroughly. I have a
number of 'Notices' and 'Strict Standards' messages appearing now.
I don't consider myself a PHP guru by any means so I'm seeking help with
understand
On Oct 3, 2008, at 12:22 PM, Jim Lucas wrote:
Maciek Sokolewicz wrote:
P.S. you are quite late with migrating, PHP 5 has been out for
several
years now
As stated in many other threads. Some people do not have a choice.
They are
not allowed to upgrade. Or, as is in many cases, the c
Maciek Sokolewicz wrote:
>
> P.S. you are quite late with migrating, PHP 5 has been out for several
> years now
>
As stated in many other threads. Some people do not have a choice. They are
not allowed to upgrade. Or, as is in many cases, the cost of fixing
everything after upgrading out weig
Thiago H. Pojda wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Operacion Control
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Lists,
I am planning to migrate from Php4 to Php5 in a few days.
Do anyone know which applications/services are upset with the migration?
I dont have enough servers to instalt each using Php4
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Operacion Control
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Lists,
>
> I am planning to migrate from Php4 to Php5 in a few days.
> Do anyone know which applications/services are upset with the migration?
> I dont have enough servers to instalt each using Php4 and then insta
Hi Lists,
I am planning to migrate from Php4 to Php5 in a few days.
Do anyone know which applications/services are upset with the migration?
I dont have enough servers to instalt each using Php4 and then install Php5 to
test.
I mean sendmail, qmail, joomla, egroupware, hordeetc
Thanks in a
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 01:16 -0500, Larry Garfield wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 July 2008 12:44:46 am Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> > It's unfortunate that PHP5 decided to throw a Strict Standards exception
> > when you include both style constructors. For instance, I'm certain at
> > one point the follow
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 12:44:46 am Robert Cummings wrote:
> It's unfortunate that PHP5 decided to throw a Strict Standards exception
> when you include both style constructors. For instance, I'm certain at
> one point the following was recommended:
>
> class Foo
> {
> function __construct(
On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 22:26 -0700, Jim Lucas wrote:
> Chris wrote:
> >> Don't forget that in PHP5, the constructor named has changed. In PHP4
> >> it called a method with the same name as the class. But, in PHP5, it
> >> looks for __construct() instead.
> >
> > If __construct doesn't exist then
Chris wrote:
Don't forget that in PHP5, the constructor named has changed. In PHP4
it called a method with the same name as the class. But, in PHP5, it
looks for __construct() instead.
If __construct doesn't exist then it falls back to the php4 way - makes
it backwards compatible :)
But, i
> Don't forget that in PHP5, the constructor named has changed. In PHP4
> it called a method with the same name as the class. But, in PHP5, it
> looks for __construct() instead.
If __construct doesn't exist then it falls back to the php4 way - makes
it backwards compatible :)
--
Postgresql &
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe setting $this->max should be done in
fetchSelectData
since that's what is causing/creating your loop.
Thanks Chris, I copied the code into the fetchSelectData function and it
seems to be working fine now!
Just need to test removing the code from the constructor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> The $players object is created before the loop:
>>> $players = new Players($lid);
>>
>>
>> Which means the code is only executed once since it's in the
>> constructor. It's not changing per loop because you're not calling the
>> code.
>>
>> Maybe setting $this->max sho
> Maybe setting $this->max should be done in
>
> fetchSelectData
>
> since that's what is causing/creating your loop.
>
Thanks Chris, I copied the code into the fetchSelectData function and it
seems to be working fine now!
Just need to test removing the code from the constructor to make sure its
>>
>> The $players object is created before the loop:
>> $players = new Players($lid);
>
>
>
> Which means the code is only executed once since it's in the
> constructor. It's not changing per loop because you're not calling the
> code.
>
> Maybe setting $this->max should be done in
>
> fetchSele
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Since the Players method is a constructor, it's more about how you set
>> the object(s) up.
>>
>> What does the loop look like before you create a new object?
>>
>
> Well see here is where it gets messy! This is not my code - I've ported a
> phpnuke module over to drago
>
> Since the Players method is a constructor, it's more about how you set
> the object(s) up.
>
> What does the loop look like before you create a new object?
>
Well see here is where it gets messy! This is not my code - I've ported a
phpnuke module over to dragonflycms.
The $players object is
> I have run through the script with a debugger, and sure
> enough, we only enter function Players once.
>
> Is this normal behaviour for PHP5 vs PHP4?
> Is there a way for me to force $this->max to be calculated each time
> function max is called?
Since the Players method is a constructor, it's
I have the following code in part of a loop:
$max = $players->max();
Important parts of players class:
class Players extends dynamicTable {
var $setup;
var $lid;
var $size;
var $max;
var $data;
var $data_result;
var $data_index;
var $player_stats_result;
var $player_stat
Bob Fisher wrote:
I am running a hybrid environment.
Box A: PHP 4.3.9
Box B: PHP 5.1.6
Box C: Memcached 1.2.2
When I set a key in memcache(Box C) from Box A, I am unable to read
it from Box B and vice versa.
I did not see any such issues mentioned in the PHP documentation.
Has anyone seen s
I am running a hybrid environment.
Box A: PHP 4.3.9
Box B: PHP 5.1.6
Box C: Memcached 1.2.2
When I set a key in memcache(Box C) from Box A, I am unable to read
it from Box B and vice versa.
I did not see any such issues mentioned in the PHP documentation.
Has anyone seen something similar? Do
I've already tried adding session_write_close(); It didn't help. The
session file gets saved and contains data after the first request,
making the request from another machine resets everything. It even
doesn't work if you make the request manually from different machines
with the same sess
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Juergen Falb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear all,
> since upgrading to php5 I've a problem with session handling. In php4 a
> user initiated a session, the session id gets afterwards handed over to a
> payment provider. When the payment provider calls a script wi
Stut wrote:
> Just wanted to pick you up on this. PHP is the only language you've
> listed that only has a single implementation. There are implementations
> of C++ compilers that are writting in other languages. I can't speak for
> Java since I have little experience but I'd be surprised if all
>
On Sat, August 25, 2007 11:56 am, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> so we would really have to
> dig deeper for a definition of 'basic oop' / 'true oop' etc.
I'll consider PHP true OOP when PECL has a Lisp extension for me to
write REAL oop code
:-)
Actually, that could be a kind of fun extension to write...
On Sat, August 25, 2007 9:45 am, Robert Cummings wrote:
> PHP4 AND PHP5 developers don't even use OOP. Tell me what is
> compelling
> in PHP5 that doesn't rely on you being an OOP developer?
The XML stuff, if you need to parse XML a lot, which is not exactly a
niche market, but not everybody needs
On Fri, August 24, 2007 10:11 am, Steve Brown wrote:
>
>
> PHP Web Server Test
>
>
>
>
>
phpinfo(), which should never be called in a production setting, is
quite possibly the worst benchmark function you could choose. :-) :-)
:-)
> I ran ab in a loop 12 times with 10,000 connections an
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
look at C++, Java, and PHP. these languages are all written in C;
Just wanted to pick you up on this. PHP is the only language you've
listed that only has a single implementation. There are implementations
of C++ compilers that are writting in other languages. I can't spe
On Sat, 2007-08-25 at 14:26 -0500, Larry Garfield wrote:
> On Saturday 25 August 2007, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> > i dont know what all this goPHP5 stuff is about.
> > all i know is there was an announcment on php.net a few weeks back saying
> > php4 is deprecated and it soon will be made obsolete.
> >
On Saturday 25 August 2007, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> i dont know what all this goPHP5 stuff is about.
> all i know is there was an announcment on php.net a few weeks back saying
> php4 is deprecated and it soon will be made obsolete.
>
> -nathan
That announcement came a week after this site launched:
i dont know what all this goPHP5 stuff is about.
all i know is there was an announcment on php.net a few weeks back saying
php4 is deprecated and it soon will be made obsolete.
-nathan
On 8/25/07, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2007-08-25 at 12:28 -0500, Larry Garfield wro
On Sat, 2007-08-25 at 12:28 -0500, Larry Garfield wrote:
> Robert and everyone: PLEASE do not reply to list AND the sender, at least not
> when I'm the sender. I don't need double copies of every message in every
> thread I participate in. Thanks.
Sorry I've been hitting reply-all since I firs
Robert and everyone: PLEASE do not reply to list AND the sender, at least not
when I'm the sender. I don't need double copies of every message in every
thread I participate in. Thanks.
On Saturday 25 August 2007, Robert Cummings wrote:
> > There is no way to respond to the above request, beca
i know this thread started off about a performance comparison, but it is
already grown into much more.
suffice it to say that i consider the oop capacity of php4 nothing more than
a stepping stone on the way
to php5. i dont know of all the oop languages out there. mostly i have
worked w/ c++ and
On Sat, 2007-08-25 at 11:09 -0500, Larry Garfield wrote:
> On Saturday 25 August 2007, Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> > Rewriting? You're assuming developers of PHP4 are using all of the
> > features in PHP5 but written using PHP4 code. That's not a very valid
> > assumption. You're also assuming they
On Saturday 25 August 2007, Robert Cummings wrote:
> Rewriting? You're assuming developers of PHP4 are using all of the
> features in PHP5 but written using PHP4 code. That's not a very valid
> assumption. You're also assuming they didn't already have code written
> in PHP4 that was then duplicate
agreed :)
On 8/25/07, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2007-08-25 at 10:57 -0400, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> > Robert,
> >
> > C is a low-level language whereas php is a high level language.
> > ill admit it openly, i am biased toward oop / design patterns.
> > and i think what i
On Sat, 2007-08-25 at 10:57 -0400, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> Robert,
>
> C is a low-level language whereas php is a high level language.
> ill admit it openly, i am biased toward oop / design patterns.
> and i think what i boils down to is what you view as 'icing'
> i view as 'bread-and-butter' ;)
I'
Robert,
C is a low-level language whereas php is a high level language.
ill admit it openly, i am biased toward oop / design patterns.
and i think what i boils down to is what you view as 'icing'
i view as 'bread-and-butter' ;)
personally i shudder when i see a big pile of usntructured code, or
a
On Sat, 2007-08-25 at 10:33 -0400, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> yes, i agree, people wont be all-of-a-sudden ignoring php4, but the
> notice on php.net says to migrate apps to 5 through the rest of the
> yaer. id say thats ample time to move away from it.
Migrate doesn't necessarily mean ditching PHP4 c
yes, i agree, people wont be all-of-a-sudden ignoring php4, but the
notice on php.net says to migrate apps to 5 through the rest of the yaer.
id say thats ample time to move away from it.
pretty much all of my applications rely on php5 features except those
where the system was running on php4 whe
On Sat, 2007-08-25 at 09:38 -0400, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> i dont know Robert; i think it depends upon the structure of ones
> business.
> for instance; i work for a company full time, and have a start up of
> my own.
> in both of those situations there is no impact on the client in the
> act of
> e
i dont know Robert; i think it depends upon the structure of ones business.
for instance; i work for a company full time, and have a start up of my own.
in both of those situations there is no impact on the client in the act of
eliminating php4 from the product implementation. the clients never us
On Sat, 2007-08-25 at 00:28 -0500, Larry Garfield wrote:
> On Friday 24 August 2007, Lester Caine wrote:
> > > What would be interesting is if a group picked up PHP4 and kept going
> > > with it in spite of the end of life announcement a few weeks back. I
> > > wonder if the PHP license would allo
On Friday 24 August 2007, Lester Caine wrote:
> > What would be interesting is if a group picked up PHP4 and kept going
> > with it in spite of the end of life announcement a few weeks back. I
> > wonder if the PHP license would allow such a thing. How open is it
> > exactly?
>
> The PROBLEM is t
Greg Donald wrote:
On 8/24/07, Steve Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The only difference I can figure is that PHP5 was the packaged version
that comes with Ubuntu and I had to compile PHP4 from source since
there is no package for it in Feisty. But I wouldn't expect a 50%
increase as a result o
On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 12:24 -0500, Greg Donald wrote:
> On 8/24/07, Steve Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The only difference I can figure is that PHP5 was the packaged version
> > that comes with Ubuntu and I had to compile PHP4 from source since
> > there is no package for it in Feisty. But
On 8/24/07, Steve Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only difference I can figure is that PHP5 was the packaged version
> that comes with Ubuntu and I had to compile PHP4 from source since
> there is no package for it in Feisty. But I wouldn't expect a 50%
> increase as a result of that. Any t
PHP5 being faster than PHP4 is greatly dependent on what features you
use. I've consistently found PHP4 to be faster for my purposes also.
Cheers,
Rob.
On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 11:38 -0400, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> what are the changes that supposedly make php5 faster than php4?
>
> when java went fr
what are the changes that supposedly make php5 faster than php4?
when java went from the 1.4 series to the 5 series it became much faster.
this is because of enhancements to the jitter mechanism for sure. i dont
know what else they changed, but i know that had a great impact on the
performance.
Recently, I've been doing a lot of benchmarking with Apache to compare
different OSes and platforms. I did a stock install of Ubuntu 7.04
Server w/ Apache2 and PHP5. To do the test, I used ab to fetch the
following document:
PHP Web Server Test
I ran ab in a loop 12 times with 10,000 con
Yep, PDO was one more question that I had and could not find dll for it.
Upgrade is an option but there are some custom dlls that we developed for
4.1.1 and do not want to spend time in checking it for higher version. But
if it is not possible then I guess we will do that
Thx
SUhas
On 5/7/07,
On Mon, May 7, 2007 5:29 pm, Suhas Pharkute wrote:
> Can someone please point me to a tutorial for PHP4.x.x and SQLite
> installation on Windows with Apache web server?
>
> I searched in Google and PHP mailing list but nothing useful. It seems
> like
> I am missing php_pdo.dll for 4.1.1 version.
F
HI,
Can someone please point me to a tutorial for PHP4.x.x and SQLite
installation on Windows with Apache web server?
I searched in Google and PHP mailing list but nothing useful. It seems like
I am missing php_pdo.dll for 4.1.1 version.
Can someone please help?
Thanks in advance,
Suhas
Myron Turner wrote:
> Travis Doherty wrote:
>
>>>
>>
>> What about the argument that PHP4 is dead. It's done. It's over.
>> There is no reason anyone should be using it, less perhaps a lack of
>> time to tweak scripts for an upgrade from 4 to 5. Even if that is the
>> case, get to work :p
Travis Doherty wrote:
What about the argument that PHP4 is dead. It's done. It's over.
There is no reason anyone should be using it, less perhaps a lack of
time to tweak scripts for an upgrade from 4 to 5. Even if that is the
case, get to work :p
"Support for PHP 4 will be dropped at th
Fernando Cosso wrote:
> Hi
> I know this topic has to be discussed several times but I have a
> situation I
> need some advices.
>
> I am working in a small company. The company does everything you need.
> Computer service, sell computers, install servers, web page, etc. I am in
> the web departme
On Mon, February 26, 2007 7:49 am, Martin Marques wrote:
> Is it posible to run apache with PHP4 and PHP5 on different virtual
> domains?
Search the list archives for "Rasmus Lerdorf" and "ProxyPass" and I
think you'll find a fairly easy way to do it.
--
Some people have a "gift" link here.
Know
> That’s via a google search ... never done it myself!
>
> S
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Martin Marques [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: 26 February 2007 03:50 PM
>> To: php-general@lists.php.net
>> Subject: [PHP] PHP4 and PHP5
>>
>
5_and_php4
Thats via a google search ... never done it myself!
S
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Marques [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 26 February 2007 03:50 PM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP] PHP4 and PHP5
>
> Is it posible to run apache
Is it posible to run apache with PHP4 and PHP5 on different virtual
domains?
--
21:50:04 up 2 days, 9:07, 0 users, load average: 0.92, 0.37, 0.18
-
Lic. Martín Marqués | SELECT 'mmarques' ||
Centro de Telemática|
Jochem Maas wrote:
Myron Turner wrote:
Christopher Weldon wrote:
You actually don't even have to run a second instance of Apache. From
what I've heard of other hosting companies doing, you can use the same
Apache installation and run PHP4 and PHP5 concurrently.
if you use CGI f
Myron Turner wrote:
> Christopher Weldon wrote:
>> You actually don't even have to run a second instance of Apache. From
>> what I've heard of other hosting companies doing, you can use the same
>> Apache installation and run PHP4 and PHP5 concurrently.
if you use CGI for one of them then yes - bu
Christopher Weldon wrote:
You actually don't even have to run a second instance of Apache. From
what I've heard of other hosting companies doing, you can use the same
Apache installation and run PHP4 and PHP5 concurrently.
However, the only thing you'd have to do is one of the following:
1) F
On Feb 5, 2007, at 2:00 PM, Jochem Maas wrote:
you don't need to use the box - you can install a 2nd copy of
apache and
run php4 on it and use the apache ProxyPass directive to make the
php4/apache
setup available via the apache(2)/php5 [std] webserver.
search the archives for 'ProxyPass'
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2007-02-07 00:00:57 -0700:
> What I need to do is get Apache looking at a
>
> /var/db/ports/php4-extensions
>
> directory, which I did create with the options file
> listing all the extensions I built individually.
>
> Can someone tell me how this can be done? How I can
>
Hey all,
I installed a new server with PHP5, but then had to
revert to PHP4 (attempted anyway) on a FreeBSD 6.0
install. I have PHP4 compiled, both the main BSD
port of lang/php4 and all of the extensions
individually.
However, the extensions, including basic ones like
MySQL are not gettin
Your problem is the $db is NOT an Object.
$q is fine as-is.
Figure out why $db isn't getting be an object -- Probably because the
username/password and/or permissions to connect to the DB aren't set
up correctly. Or you didn't copy over the DB tables PostNuke and
dotProject need.
On Mon, Februa
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Jochem Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : lundi 5 février 2007 21:00
> À : Skip Evans
> Cc : 'PHP-General'
> Objet : Re: [PHP] PHP4 to PHP5 issue
>
> Skip Evans wrote:
> > Tim wrote:
> >> Yes,
Skip Evans wrote:
> Tim wrote:
>> Yes, our company used it for three months before dumping it regarding
>> PHP5
>> incompatibility and some other "mistakes".. I ended up having to fix/hack
>> too many things (sessions doing weird things, broken forum,
>> translations all
>> messed up, user roles no
Tim wrote:
Yes, our company used it for three months before dumping it regarding PHP5
incompatibility and some other "mistakes".. I ended up having to fix/hack
too many things (sessions doing weird things, broken forum, translations all
messed up, user roles not working quite right, admin system
Hi,
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Skip Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : lundi 5 février 2007 19:31
> Cc : PHP-General
> Objet : Re: [PHP] PHP4 to PHP5 issue
>
> Jochem Maas wrote:
> >
> > the problem is not with $q but with $db. $db is not
Hi,
It look like your system cannot init adodb library.
It may SQL setup problem...
On Monday 05 February 2007 19:58, Skip Evans wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I installed a new FreeBSD 6.0 server here in the
> office with PHP5. I moved over several sites we
> developed under PHP4, and all of those seem t
Jochem Maas wrote:
the problem is not with $q but with $db. $db is not an object,
why that is so I don't know - more bug hunting for you I'm afraid.
Woops! I sure read that one wrong.
Thanks, I will dig deeper.
Does anyone have any experience running dotProject
under PHP5?
Skip Evans
Big
Skip Evans wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I installed a new FreeBSD 6.0 server here in the office with PHP5. I
> moved over several sites we developed under PHP4, and all of those seem
> to be functioning perfectly, but I am getting an error on to sites, on
> PostNuke based and our dotProject system.
>
>
Hey all,
I installed a new FreeBSD 6.0 server here in the
office with PHP5. I moved over several sites we
developed under PHP4, and all of those seem to be
functioning perfectly, but I am getting an error
on to sites, on PostNuke based and our dotProject
system.
Both errors are the same, a
But users of the PEAR solution to staticProperties may or may not want
any other portion of PEAR as well.
But they have the possibility to choose. ;)
So it's only "better" if it suits the needs of the user.
You'd have to ask the PEAR users if it's "better" for them.
1. I sent it here because I
On Fri, October 6, 2006 10:59 am, Hodicska Gergely wrote:
>> This would be Really Nifty, if PHP allowed multiple inheritence so
>> you
>> could have a mixin class...
>>
>> Otherwise, however, you have to have a common base class across all
>> the various class systems in use in your multitude of we
On Fri, October 6, 2006 7:22 am, Hodicska Gergely wrote:
> I'm curious about your opinion.
> class base
> {
> function &staticProperty($name, $value = null)
> {
> static $properties = array();
This would be Really Nifty, if PHP allowed
Hi!
I had a little discussion on a forum topic about static class method and
properties. Somebody there pointed to the PEAR::getStaticProperty()
solution to emulate static properties in PHP4. I was not familiar with
it but its approach seems a little strange for me. It is not really more
than st
Hi!
I had a little discussion on a forum topic about static class method and
properties. Somebody there pointed to the PEAR::getStaticProperty()
solution to emulate static properties in PHP4. I was not familiar with
it but its approach seems a little strange for me. It is not really more
than st
Hi,
Please, please forgive! How dumb a person (me!) can sometimes be!
I looked at httpd.conf again and saw that instead of replacing php4.so
library object I added a new line with php5 entry...
Sorry to have bothered!
Thanks!
Zbyszek
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
> On Mon,
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Curt Zirzow wrote:
Hi there again,
> > Thanks for such a fast response. I used portinstall. I did have apache
> > 1.3.37 at the beginning but it later turned out that for some reason I
> > will have to upgrade for apache 2.x so I ran pkg_delete and the went for
> > apache2.
>
On 9/11/06, Zbigniew Szalbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Curt Zirzow wrote:
Hello,
> > I would appreciate your help. I am trying to get php and apache work
> > together and have a strange error while starting apache:
> >
> > Can't locate API module structure `php4_module' in
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Curt Zirzow wrote:
Hello,
> > I would appreciate your help. I am trying to get php and apache work
> > together and have a strange error while starting apache:
> >
> > Can't locate API module structure `php4_module' in file
> > /usr/local/libexec/apache2/libphp5.so: Undefined
On 9/11/06, Zbigniew Szalbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I would appreciate your help. I am trying to get php and apache work
together and have a strange error while starting apache:
Can't locate API module structure `php4_module' in file
/usr/local/libexec/apache2/libphp5.so: Undefined s
Hello,
I would appreciate your help. I am trying to get php and apache work
together and have a strange error while starting apache:
Can't locate API module structure `php4_module' in file
/usr/local/libexec/apache2/libphp5.so: Undefined symbol "php4_module"
I am using PHP 5.1.6 (cli) and Apache
Karl Glennon wrote:
[snip]
I expected to have the ability to get the url of a location's map with
the floowing statement:
print $this->Location->GetMap()->GetUrl();
[snip]
Is there any other syntax in PHP4 to allow me to concisely call a method
on a return object? eg. ($this->Location->GetMap
On Thursday 30 March 2006 14:05, Karl Glennon wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have an object structure, whereby a location object contains a method
> to return it's map object. The map object contains a method to return
> it's URL.
>
> I expected to have the ability to get the url of a location's map with
Hi there,
I have an object structure, whereby a location object contains a method
to return it's map object. The map object contains a method to return
it's URL.
I expected to have the ability to get the url of a location's map with
the floowing statement:
print $this->Location->GetMap()->
Hello everyone.
I'm trying to use my php4 conecting to a mysql5 server, and then executing
some command lines to create a stored procedure but it's not working.
When a tried to execute "delimiter |", my php gets de follow error:
You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresp
Hello everyone.
I'm trying to use my php4 conecting to a mysql5 server, and then executing
some command lines to create a stored procedure but it's not working.
When a tried to execute "delimiter |", my php gets de follow error:
You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresp
Hi,
I haven't yet worked with namespaces in XML before when it comes to DOM
related methods. My source is an Office 2003 Excel XML and it contains
XML like:
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40";>
How can I use an xpath expression to find e.g. all rows in Worksheet
"Sheet1" ?
My pro
1 - 100 of 310 matches
Mail list logo
