Perhaps someone can tell me the secret to getting problem-free access to the
php newsgroups using OE. I have two other newsgroup servers configured in
OE which do not give me any difficulties at all. My setup for news.php.net
however gives me nothing but problems. Inability to connect to mess
Indeed. Using ImageMagick's 'identify' command, the first layer is 30x24
on a 32x32 canvas.
radioactive-bread-eek.gif[0] GIF 30x24 32x32+2+6 8-bit PseudoClass 256c
2.11kb
radioactive-bread-eek.gif[1] GIF 32x27 32x32+0+4 8-bit PseudoClass 256c
2.11kb
If getimagesize() works on the canvas, the
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 16:25 -0500, Ben wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 15:07 -0500, Ben wrote:
On my site I have a web form for users to upload graphics, however there
are constraints on the size allowed. Recently, a user has been having
problems,
On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 16:25 -0500, Ben wrote:
> Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 15:07 -0500, Ben wrote:
> >> On my site I have a web form for users to upload graphics, however there
> >> are constraints on the size allowed. Recently, a user has been having
> >> problems, becaus
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 15:07 -0500, Ben wrote:
On my site I have a web form for users to upload graphics, however there
are constraints on the size allowed. Recently, a user has been having
problems, because the code is reporting the wrong size - a size too
small to be a
On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 15:07 -0500, Ben wrote:
> On my site I have a web form for users to upload graphics, however there
> are constraints on the size allowed. Recently, a user has been having
> problems, because the code is reporting the wrong size - a size too
> small to be allowed! They sen
On my site I have a web form for users to upload graphics, however there
are constraints on the size allowed. Recently, a user has been having
problems, because the code is reporting the wrong size - a size too
small to be allowed! They sent me a copy of the image so I could
confirm the error
Hi,
Well, you will have an infinite recursion there if the mapping has
cycles, something like A->B, B->C, C->A would generate an invite
recursion.
Checking if the mapping has cycles is pretty simple: you have to
create a directed graph and then go through the graph in DFS marking
each visited nod
I'm cleaning up some inherited code in our data import module. For a
variety of reasons we have to support old standards of the import
format. Since some of those old versions were created we have since
renamed some fields in our data structure. So right now I've a hard
map for some field names...
Robert Cummings wrote:
> Don't forget nobody is being paid to handle bug reports, it's all on a
> volunteer basis and I'm quite certain they get oodles of real bogus
> bugs.
Hi Robert
it's a two-way thing - nobody is paying me to write any bug reports, I'm
also volunteering my time and effort. N
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 04:07:54PM -0500, Greg Beaver wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> > I understand where you're coming from, and I've been on the same road
> > before with PHP bug reports. And while I remember being really annoyed,
> > especially when it turned out to actually be a bug, I h
Robert Cummings wrote:
> I understand where you're coming from, and I've been on the same road
> before with PHP bug reports. And while I remember being really annoyed,
> especially when it turned out to actually be a bug, I have to say if you
> define your case clearly and state where either the
Per Jessen wrote:
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 15:25, Per Jessen wrote:
Daniel Brown wrote:
In reality, those are canned responses. Jani didn't type that up
himself, he just selected it from a drop-down that we have.
In all honesty, that only makes it worse. To make an effor
Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 15:25, Per Jessen wrote:
>> Daniel Brown wrote:
>>> In reality, those are canned responses. Jani didn't type that up
>>> himself, he just selected it from a drop-down that we have.
>>
>> In all honesty, that only makes it worse. To make an effort to
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 15:25, Per Jessen wrote:
> Daniel Brown wrote:
>> In reality, those are canned responses. Jani didn't type that up
>> himself, he just selected it from a drop-down that we have.
>
> In all honesty, that only makes it worse. To make an effort to improve
> on things only
Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 13:18, Per Jessen wrote:
>>
>> As for being aggressive - well, being fobbed off with an RTFM when
>>
>> 1) I've spent some time and effort in testing, documenting and
>> reporting the bug, and
>> 2) the behaviour is at best undocumented,
>>
>> well, ye
Ben Dunlap wrote:
> Per Jessen wrote:
>
>> Which is exactly the bug I reported. An application that
>> deliberately ignores the locale setting passed from the environment
>> is buggy unless it is clearly documented. Why should a developer be
>> forced to be aware of the locale when it has alrea
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 13:18, Per Jessen wrote:
>
> As for being aggressive - well, being fobbed off with an RTFM when
>
> 1) I've spent some time and effort in testing, documenting and reporting
> the bug, and
> 2) the behaviour is at best undocumented,
>
> well, yes, it p.. me off. It's jus
Per Jessen wrote:
> Which is exactly the bug I reported. An application that deliberately
> ignores the locale setting passed from the environment is buggy unless
> it is clearly documented. Why should a developer be forced to be aware
> of the locale when it has already been done for him? That
Jim Lucas wrote:
> From what I can tell, the op is trying to set the locale /AT/ the cli,
> not from within the script.
Exactly Jim. A typical Linux installation in France/Germany/Greece/
Russia/whereever will have an appropriate environment (e.g. LC_ALL) set
such that unix commands such as "dat
Jim Lucas wrote:
Kyle Smith wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
Kyle Smith wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
See http://bugs.php.net/?id=48612
"Thank you for taking the time to write to us, but this is not
a bug. And RTFM". (RTFM is my interpretation of the rest).
And that only t
Kyle Smith wrote:
> I don't think your aggressive attitude to the situation is helping
> anyone here. The manual *explicitly* states that using
> setlocale(LC_xyz,'') will use the environment variable setting for
> that LC_xyz option. This *implies* that, by default, those
> environment variabl
Kyle Smith wrote:
> Per Jessen wrote:
>> Kyle Smith wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Per Jessen wrote:
>>>
See http://bugs.php.net/?id=48612
"Thank you for taking the time to write to us, but this is not
a bug. And RTFM". (RTFM is my interpretation of the rest).
And that only to
Per Jessen wrote:
Kyle Smith wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
See http://bugs.php.net/?id=48612
"Thank you for taking the time to write to us, but this is not
a bug. And RTFM". (RTFM is my interpretation of the rest).
And that only took a little more than a month. Thanks very much.
Can anyo
Kyle Smith wrote:
> Per Jessen wrote:
>> See http://bugs.php.net/?id=48612
>>
>> "Thank you for taking the time to write to us, but this is not
>> a bug. And RTFM". (RTFM is my interpretation of the rest).
>>
>> And that only took a little more than a month. Thanks very much.
>>
>> Can anyone here
Per Jessen wrote:
See http://bugs.php.net/?id=48612
"Thank you for taking the time to write to us, but this is not
a bug. And RTFM". (RTFM is my interpretation of the rest).
And that only took a little more than a month. Thanks very much.
Can anyone here tell me why the CLI behaviour reported
See http://bugs.php.net/?id=48612
"Thank you for taking the time to write to us, but this is not
a bug. And RTFM". (RTFM is my interpretation of the rest).
And that only took a little more than a month. Thanks very much.
Can anyone here tell me why the CLI behaviour reported is not a bug? An
ex
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 09:48:06AM -0400, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 09:43, Tom Worster wrote:
> > On 6/26/09 9:20 AM, "Michelle Konzack"
> > wrote:
> >
> >> ...and no one care about the foreign (european) sniper WHO killed Neda
> >> in Iran.
> >
> > i don't know why you'd th
-Original Message-
From: Michelle Konzack [mailto:linux4miche...@tamay-dogan.net]
Sent: 26 June 2009 03:20 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] This Friday's OT Thread
...and no one care about the foreign (european) sniper WHO killed Neda in
Iran.
Note: I ca
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 09:43, Tom Worster wrote:
> On 6/26/09 9:20 AM, "Michelle Konzack"
> wrote:
>
>> ...and no one care about the foreign (european) sniper WHO killed Neda
>> in Iran.
>
> i don't know why you'd think that. the story is all over the news. american
> pols have been exploiting
On 6/26/09 9:20 AM, "Michelle Konzack"
wrote:
> ...and no one care about the foreign (european) sniper WHO killed Neda
> in Iran.
i don't know why you'd think that. the story is all over the news. american
pols have been exploiting it. cnn reports cia hay have been behind the
shooting.
--
...and no one care about the foreign (european) sniper WHO killed Neda
in Iran.
Note: I can not reach my Company Website in Tehran nor can I reach my
Office over fixed telephone lines. I can not even contact one of
my 57 employees privately. No one has tried to access
2009/6/26 Robert Cummings :
> :(
>
>
>
> Tom Worster wrote:
>>
>> and Kaleem Omar.
>>
>> and 15 people in Baghdad when motorcycle loaded with nails and
>> ball-bearings
>> exploded in a crowded bazaar.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/26/09 4:27 AM, "Robert Cummings" wrote:
>>
>>> Farah Fawcett has also died. I g
:(
Tom Worster wrote:
and Kaleem Omar.
and 15 people in Baghdad when motorcycle loaded with nails and ball-bearings
exploded in a crowded bazaar.
On 6/26/09 4:27 AM, "Robert Cummings" wrote:
Farah Fawcett has also died. I guess you gotta go sometime :|
Björn Bartels wrote:
Hello fello
and Kaleem Omar.
and 15 people in Baghdad when motorcycle loaded with nails and ball-bearings
exploded in a crowded bazaar.
On 6/26/09 4:27 AM, "Robert Cummings" wrote:
> Farah Fawcett has also died. I guess you gotta go sometime :|
>
> Björn Bartels wrote:
>> Hello fellow coders...
>>
>> T
Farah Fawcett has also died. I guess you gotta go sometime :|
Björn Bartels wrote:
Hello fellow coders...
THE 'KING OF POP' IS DEAD !
Tonight (here in Germany), Mr. Michael Joseph Jackson, also known as
'the king of pop',
died on heart failure in the age of 50.
I just want to express my
Hello fellow coders...
THE 'KING OF POP' IS DEAD !
Tonight (here in Germany), Mr. Michael Joseph Jackson, also known as
'the king of pop',
died on heart failure in the age of 50.
I just want to express my condolences to his family and friends and
all the people
who loved him and his music
Wait, that's not how everyone else gets ready for a coding marathon?
You guys are doing it wrong!
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>>> I'm self-employed. I don't plan on ever laying myself off.
>>
>> Mind out of the gutter, Rob. Words like "self," "laying," and
>> "off" wil
>> I'm self-employed. I don't plan on ever laying myself off.
>
> Mind out of the gutter, Rob. Words like "self," "laying," and
> "off" will get you flagged.
>
How naive I was to think that I might be the only one to make the connection!
--
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibber
> I'm self-employed. I don't plan on ever laying myself off.
>
Wow, I really replaced "laying" with "getting" in my mental eye and
that sentence made too much sense. Please, don't ever do that to me
again!
--
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
--
PHP General Mailing Li
Collage? you better try highschool ;)
Anyway tomorrow my sis has bat-mitzva ;)
Good night folks!
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
>Hey, folks;
>
>It's been a while since we've launched a Friday OT thread, so here
> ya' go. Feel free to post nonsense, babble, share
[snip]
...stuff...
[/snip]
NRSFW - but it is just words and a chick flipping you off and some other
really funny stuff (some of it reminds me of our very own PJ);
http://www.27bslash6.com/strata.html
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/un
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 15:22, Jason Pruim wrote:
>
> I just had my interview with them today. They are starting the background
> check right now.
Ahh, fantastic! Let me know the area code from which they'll be
calling so that, if they do, I'll make it a priority to answer it
rather than lett
Jason Pruim
On Jun 19, 2009, at 3:14 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 15:00, Jason Pruim
wrote:
Wow dan, must be nice to have the time to read all that :P
I could rant about how hard it is to find a job when you don't have
much
verifiable experience But instead I put
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 15:00, Jason Pruim wrote:
> Wow dan, must be nice to have the time to read all that :P
>
> I could rant about how hard it is to find a job when you don't have much
> verifiable experience But instead I put together a website which has
> links to everywhere that I'm watch
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 15:05, Robert Cummings wrote:
I'm self-employed. I don't plan on ever laying myself off.
Mind out of the gutter, Rob. Words like "self," "laying," and
"off" will get you flagged.
Gutter? It's sounds like your alluding to basic personal mainten
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 15:05, Robert Cummings wrote:
>>
>> I'm self-employed. I don't plan on ever laying myself off.
>
> Mind out of the gutter, Rob. Words like "self," "laying," and
> "off" will get you flagged.
>
> --
>
> daniel.br...@
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 15:05, Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> I'm self-employed. I don't plan on ever laying myself off.
Mind out of the gutter, Rob. Words like "self," "laying," and
"off" will get you flagged.
--
daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net
http://www.parasane.net/ || http:/
Jason Pruim wrote:
Wow dan, must be nice to have the time to read all that :P
I could rant about how hard it is to find a job when you don't have
much verifiable experience But instead I put together a website
which has links to everywhere that I'm watching. So if anyone is in
central
Wow dan, must be nice to have the time to read all that :P
I could rant about how hard it is to find a job when you don't have
much verifiable experience But instead I put together a website
which has links to everywhere that I'm watching. So if anyone is in
central Florida and looking
Hey, folks;
It's been a while since we've launched a Friday OT thread, so here
ya' go. Feel free to post nonsense, babble, share links, blow off
some steam, bitch and complain about a colleague, whatever. Just
remember that you're live to the world and are being archived and
preserved fo
2009/4/30 Olivier Lalonde :
> Hi all,
>
> Since I can't do $this = new Class(); within my class (it gives an
> error), I was looking for ways to get the same result by other means.
>
> I am actually working on an ORM and trying to implement lazy loading.
>
> $book = $orm->getBook('id'); // returns
2009/5/7 Richard Quadling :
> 2009/4/30 Olivier Lalonde :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Since I can't do $this = new Class(); within my class (it gives an
>> error), I was looking for ways to get the same result by other means.
>>
>> I am actually working on an ORM and trying to implement lazy loading.
>>
>> $b
Hi all,
Since I can't do $this = new Class(); within my class (it gives an
error), I was looking for ways to get the same result by other means.
I am actually working on an ORM and trying to implement lazy loading.
$book = $orm->getBook('id'); // returns an Orm object
$book->load();
// $book sh
2009/3/11 Jochem Maas
> Stuart schreef:
> > Escape stuff coming in and escape stuff going out. There are no
> exceptions.
>
>
> actually that should be: filter stuff coming in, escape stuff going out.
>
Good schreef! Erm, I mean, quite right to.
Top o' the morning. Etc.
-Stuart
--
http://stu
Stuart schreef:
> Please include the list when replying unless you're looking to hire me!
>
> 2009/3/11 filtered
>
>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 13:41, Stuart wrote:
>>> 2009/3/11 filtered
>>> $_GET['cam'] looks fine. $_GET['studio'] is not.
>>> I could build a URL that would output a javascript
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> filtered wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 13:44, Jochem Maas wrote:
>>>
>>> filtered schreef:
Hi,
we have script containing
>>>
>>> let say I do:
>>>
>>> example.com/yourscript.php?studio=alert('I
>>>
filtered wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 13:44, Jochem Maas wrote:
filtered schreef:
Hi,
we have script containing
let say I do:
example.com/yourscript.php?studio=alert('I am an evil
haxor');
excusing the fact that the query is not urlencoded, what happens on your site
(replace domain a
> filtered schreef:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we have script containing
>>
>>
>
> let say I do:
>
> example.com/yourscript.php?studio=alert('I am
> an evil haxor');
>
> excusing the fact that the query is not urlencoded, what happens on your site
> (replace domain and script name to match your site/script)
>
Please include the list when replying unless you're looking to hire me!
2009/3/11 filtered
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 13:41, Stuart wrote:
> > 2009/3/11 filtered
>
> >
> > $_GET['cam'] looks fine. $_GET['studio'] is not.
> > I could build a URL that would output a javascript tag to do anything
filtered wrote:
Hi,
we have script containing
http://www.yourwebsite.org/yourpage.php?studio=alert('xss');
and
http://example.com""; />';
}
?>
That I don't think is exploitable since you are not doing anything with
cam directly but are only acting if it is a string ma
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 13:44, Jochem Maas wrote:
> filtered schreef:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we have script containing
>>
>>
>
> let say I do:
>
> example.com/yourscript.php?studio=alert('I am
> an evil haxor');
>
> excusing the fact that the query is not urlencoded, what happens on your site
> (replace
filtered wrote:
Hi,
we have script containing
and
http://example.com""; />';
}
?>
Is this code prone to XSS attacks or for attacking the local webserver
and if so, how?
$cam isn't used anywhere else.
-a
It certainly is XSS vulnerable through a reflective XSS attack.
cl
filtered schreef:
> Hi,
>
> we have script containing
>
>
let say I do:
example.com/yourscript.php?studio=alert('I am an
evil haxor');
excusing the fact that the query is not urlencoded, what happens on your site
(replace domain and script name to match your site/script)
>
> and
>
>
2009/3/11 filtered
> Hi,
>
> we have script containing
>
>
>
> and
>
>$cam = $_GET['cam'];
>
>if ($cam == '1') {
>echo 'http://example.com""; />';
>}
> ?>
>
> Is this code prone to XSS attacks or for attacking the local webserver
> and if so, how?
>
>
Hi,
we have script containing
and
http://example.com""; />';
}
?>
Is this code prone to XSS attacks or for attacking the local webserver
and if so, how?
$cam isn't used anywhere else.
-a
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.p
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Eric Butera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I generate my data access objects too. It goes against my better
>> judgment, but performance wins out in this specific situation.
>
> getting of
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Eric Butera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I generate my data access objects too. It goes against my better
> judgment, but performance wins out in this specific situation.
>
getting off the point of the thread (i could care less :D), but have you
seen the model ta
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Eric Butera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Active Record sucks :P
>
> i prefer code generation to runtime introspection, but runtime
> introspection+code generation, well thats a compromise
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Eric Butera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Active Record sucks :P
>
i prefer code generation to runtime introspection, but runtime
introspection+code generation, well thats a compromise i can live w/ ;)
-nathan
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... now had 'self' been late (statically) bound ... no I won't go there, we
> get
> 'static' very soon now :-P
and lets not forget the __*Static() magic method suite we're getting too :)
-nathan
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nathan Nobbe schreef:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Micah Gersten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Eric Butera wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>> wrote:
>
Nathan Nobbe schreef:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Micah Gersten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eric Butera wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
(using $this->foo or MyClass::$foo for static properties).
also self::
Actually within a class, I
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Micah Gersten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Eric Butera wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> (using $this->foo or MyClass::$foo for static properties).
> >>
> >
> > also self::
> >
> >
> Actually within a
Eric Butera wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> (using $this->foo or MyClass::$foo for static properties).
>>
>
> also self::
>
>
Actually within a class, I think you must self:: before a static
property or something shows up in the err
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (using $this->foo or MyClass::$foo for static properties).
also self::
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
uaca man schreef:
Hello to all my fellow members of the PHP community.
As a personal rule i always use $this in front of class members, but i
always knew from others programing languages and i guess I just
thought it was same in PHP that without $this keyword it should work
just the same, howeve
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 9:55 AM, uaca man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello to all my fellow members of the PHP community.
>
> As a personal rule i always use $this in front of class members, but i
> always knew from others programing languages and i guess I just
> thought it was same in PHP that
Hello to all my fellow members of the PHP community.
As a personal rule i always use $this in front of class members, but i
always knew from others programing languages and i guess I just
thought it was same in PHP that without $this keyword it should work
just the same, however in the code bellow
Mário Gamito wrote:
Hi,
I have a ASP.NET / C# page calling a webmail Linux server:
WebRequest request =
WebRequest.Create("http://192.168.1.4/horde/imp/index.php?username=gamito";);
(etc...)
It seems to work as in my Linux Apache logs, i get:
(...) "GET /horde/imp/index.php?username=gamito
Hi,
I have a ASP.NET / C# page calling a webmail Linux server:
WebRequest request =
WebRequest.Create("http://192.168.1.4/horde/imp/index.php?username=gamito";);
(etc...)
It seems to work as in my Linux Apache logs, i get:
(...) "GET /horde/imp/index.php?username=gamito HTTP/1.1" 200 223
F
On Sat, 2007-10-20 at 18:45 -0700, Instruct ICC wrote:
> > > >
> > > >One idea that has always been REALLY popular around here... stuff your
> > > >image in a database. *MUHAWHAWHAWHAWHAW* *Ducks from the flying rocks*.
> > > >
> > > >Cheers,
> > > >Rob.
> > > >--
> > >
> > > Rob:
> > >
> > > Tha
> > >> > I want to prohibit an image from being shown to anyone who is not
> > >> > permitted (i.e., logged in).
> > >> >
> > >> > The way I want to do this is to:
> > >> >
> > >> > 1. Set [file] permissions...
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> What if 2 or more users access the application at th
> >> I think I found a solution.
> >>
> >> Here's the url:
> >>
> >> http://www.webbytedd.com/bbb/image-test1/
> >>
> >> The point is that the image is only accessible via this script, is
> >> this correct?
> >
> >I can access it without a script:
> >http://www.webbytedd.com/bbb/image-test1/i
At 11:58 AM -0400 10/20/07, Robert Cummings wrote:
Most likely
though, you have access to .htaccess and so you could create a locked
images directory that exists within the web tree but which can't be
accessed by a browser. This would give you what you need to be within
the confines of safe mode
Hi gang:
Does this work any better at keeping the image safe?
http://www.webbytedd.com/bbb/image-test2/
Cheers,
tedd
--
---
http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/un
On Sat, 2007-10-20 at 09:59 -0400, tedd wrote:
> At 4:59 PM -0400 10/19/07, Robert Cummings wrote:
> >On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 13:31 -0700, Instruct ICC wrote:
> >> > I want to prohibit an image from being shown to anyone who is not
> >> > permitted (i.e., logged in).
> >> >
> >> > The way I want
At 1:45 PM -0700 10/19/07, Instruct ICC wrote:
> Hi gang:
I think I found a solution.
Here's the url:
http://www.webbytedd.com/bbb/image-test1/
The point is that the image is only accessible via this script, is
this correct?
I can access it without a script:
http://www.webbytedd.com/
At 1:57 PM -0700 10/19/07, Instruct ICC wrote:
> but in the img tag, try src="display_image.php?id=anId"
and in display_image.php, test if the user is authorized before
displaying the image.
Then a direct call to display_image.php?id=anId would still have a
chance to authenticate the user.
At 4:59 PM -0400 10/19/07, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 13:31 -0700, Instruct ICC wrote:
> I want to prohibit an image from being shown to anyone who is not
> permitted (i.e., logged in).
>
> The way I want to do this is to:
>
> 1. Set [file] permissions...
What if 2 or
At 1:31 PM -0700 10/19/07, Instruct ICC wrote:
> I want to prohibit an image from being shown to anyone who is not
permitted (i.e., logged in).
The way I want to do this is to:
> 1. Set [file] permissions...
What if 2 or more users access the application at the same time?
Set the perm
At 1:09 PM -0400 10/19/07, Wolf wrote:
actually, you could run it by
1. making the page
2. flushing the output buffer (which puts it in the screen)
3. run the 2nd script
Nope, tried it.
Whatever is done in a script is done before any output to the browser.
Cheers,
tedd
--
---
http://sp
At 6:23 PM +0200 10/19/07, Zoltán Németh wrote:
2007. 10. 19, péntek keltezéssel 12.07-kor tedd ezt írta:
At 8:19 PM -0400 10/18/07, TG wrote:
>Describe the process a little more.
Ok, here's what I want to do.
I want to prohibit an image from being shown to anyone who is not
permitted (i.
On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 13:31 -0700, Instruct ICC wrote:
> > I want to prohibit an image from being shown to anyone who is not
> > permitted (i.e., logged in).
> >
> > The way I want to do this is to:
> >
> > 1. Set [file] permissions...
>
>
>
> What if 2 or more users access the application at
> but in the img tag, try src="display_image.php?id=anId"
> and in display_image.php, test if the user is authorized before displaying
> the image.
> Then a direct call to display_image.php?id=anId would still have a chance to
> authenticate the user.
Forgot to reiterate:
Keep the images where
> Hi gang:
>
> I think I found a solution.
>
> Here's the url:
>
> http://www.webbytedd.com/bbb/image-test1/
>
> The point is that the image is only accessible via this script, is
> this correct?
I can access it without a script:
http://www.webbytedd.com/bbb/image-test1/images/a.jpg
It may
> I want to prohibit an image from being shown to anyone who is not
> permitted (i.e., logged in).
>
> The way I want to do this is to:
>
> 1. Set [file] permissions...
What if 2 or more users access the application at the same time?
Set the permissions so only the PHP application can acces
On 10/19/07, Philip Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/19/07, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi gang:
> >
> > I think I found a solution.
> >
> > Here's the url:
> >
> > http://www.webbytedd.com/bbb/image-test1/
> >
> > The point is that the image is only accessible via this scr
Hi gang:
I think I found a solution.
Here's the url:
http://www.webbytedd.com/bbb/image-test1/
The point is that the image is only accessible via this script, is
this correct?
The technique I used simply runs the first php script, which creates
the page that has uses ajax to trigger anothe
actually, you could run it by
1. making the page
2. flushing the output buffer (which puts it in the screen)
3. run the 2nd script
tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 12:06 AM -0400 10/19/07, Nathan Hawks wrote:
> >If by "creates a web page" you just mean it echos output to the browser,
1 - 100 of 286 matches
Mail list logo
