Hi.
I've just fixed many bugs in two free components of mine;
htmlMicroscope (63kb) is used to display very large php/js arrays and
objects in the browser,
in a collapsed but expandable view. It's loaded with features that make
browsing large
datasets fun. This 1.3.3 release fixes many of the bug
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Rene Veerman wrote:
> Hi, i got this error that i can't figure out.. Maybe you can help;
>
> Notice: mbConfig(): The script tried to execute a method or access a
> property of an incomplete object. Please ensure that the class
> definition "
Hi, i got this error that i can't figure out.. Maybe you can help;
Notice: mbConfig(): The script tried to execute a method or access a
property of an incomplete object. Please ensure that the class
definition "classCoreDBtable" of the object you are trying to operate
on was loaded _before_ unseri
unlikely. it's a apache delivered ip address.. very little chance of
insert vulnerabilities, imho.
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Tanel Tammik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there a vulnerability with using $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] in sql queries?
>
> Br
> Tanel
>
>
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http:
inheritance of this kind is useful if you have common descendants for
specific types of object
object mammal (
function eat (mixed $food)
function shit ()
function sleep()
)
object carnivore extends mammal (
function eat (meat $food)
)
object herbivore extends mammal (
function eat (vegg
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Andres Gonzalez
wrote:
> I have a large C source file that is generated by a separate
> source-generating program. When the generated src file is compiled, it
> produces tons of warnings. I want to edit the generated src file and delete
> the offending lines.
>
>
we don't have that class, nor it's documentation...?
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:17 PM, saeed ahmed wrote:
> I extremely sorry, if my topic isn't related with this group. I apologizes
> for this.
>
> I'm trying to add page number on the pdf. I have try the below code.
> but couldn't get the page nu
Hi.
I'm trying to build a html analyzer that looks at natural words in html text.
I'd like to build a routine that walks through the HTML character by
character, but i'm not sure on how to properly walk through escaped "
and ' characters in javascript or other embedded languages. Skipping
the fir
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Malka Cymbalista
wrote:
> Hi all, we are running Apache 2.2.6 and PHP 5.2.6 on a Linux machine. If
> someone gets an error when displaying a php web page, he does not get any
> error message on the screen. The arror is written into the apache error log
> file,
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Rene Veerman wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I'm doing the 5.3-strict thing, and am removing all my
>> passing-by-reference muck from a script of mine.
>>
>> But i've run into a problem;
>>
>> I use the foll
changed all function-definitions to include a "&" before their name,
no change in behavior though..
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Rene Veerman wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm doing the 5.3-strict thing, and am removing all my
> passing-by-reference muck from a script o
Hi.
I'm doing the 5.3-strict thing, and am removing all my
passing-by-reference muck from a script of mine.
But i've run into a problem;
I use the following construct to push new values fairly deeply inside
an array structure;
$chase = chaseToReference ($wm, $path);
$arr = result($chase);
$arr[
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Rene Veerman wrote:
> I have an custom error handler that i initialize as such;
>
> error_reporting(E_ALL);
> $oldError_handler = set_error_handler("nonFatalErrorHandler");
>
> with this, notices are still displayed as single line visib
I have an custom error handler that i initialize as such;
error_reporting(E_ALL);
$oldError_handler = set_error_handler("nonFatalErrorHandler");
with this, notices are still displayed as single line visible html.
i'd like to catch the notices and push them into a db.
any ideas on how i do that?
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 23:01 -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
>>>
>>> However what I really want is a two-way comparison. I want elements that
>>> don't exist in either to be returned:
>>>
>>
>>
>> I don't see any p
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> I have the following scenario:
>
>
>
> $array1 = array("12", "34", "56", "78", "90");
>
> $array2 = array("12", "23", "56", "78", "89");
>
>
>
> $result = array_diff($array1, $array2);
>
>
>
> print_r($result);
>
>
>
>
>
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Rene Veerman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Rene Veerman wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Rene Veerman wrote:
>>> htmlMicroscope (that i wrote and opensourced) can be used to look at
>>> very big arrays easill
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Rene Veerman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Rene Veerman wrote:
>> htmlMicroscope (that i wrote and opensourced) can be used to look at
>> very big arrays easilly in a browser.
>> I fully intend to fix the final bugs and release
htmlMicroscope (that i wrote and opensourced) can be used to look at
very big arrays easilly in a browser.
I fully intend to fix the final bugs and release a real 1.3.0 release,
and not abandon that project..
In fact, i could use a simple project to work on atm, to re-focus
myself on useful work a
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Rene Veerman wrote:
> htmlMicroscope (that i wrote and opensourced) can be used to look at
> very big arrays easilly in a browser.
> I fully intend to fix the final bugs and release a real 1.3.0 release,
> and not abandon that project..
>
> In f
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 05:53 +0100, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>
> you sure you're only smoking cigarettes?
>
> has to be one of the most random replies to any php thread I've ever
> seen - awesome!
>
> regar
27;re only smoking cigarettes?
>
> has to be one of the most random replies to any php thread I've ever
> seen - awesome!
>
> regards
>
> Rene Veerman wrote:
>> yea i'm not the only one with those type of problems. sometimes times
>> slows down in my room so
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Rene Veerman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Dan Joseph wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Peter Lind wrote:
>>
>>> That said, there can be little doubt that the response you got went a
>>> tad too far - some n
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Dan Joseph wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Peter Lind wrote:
>
>> That said, there can be little doubt that the response you got went a
>> tad too far - some netiquette lessons would be useful, I think.
>>
>>
>
> In defense of the people that react harshly
list in winter time, when i
actually can afford the concentration to supply useful programming
tips.
--!!
right now, i'm still a bit stressed. personal reasons.
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Peter Lind wrote:
> On 9 April 2010 12:20, Rene Veerman wrote:
>> lolz :)) u try to be
lolz :)) u try to be nice, and this is what u get?!?! :-D
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> Somebody ban this person. He/she is creating nuisance here. ^)
>
> --
> Nilesh Govindarajan
> Site & Server Administrator
> www.itech7.com
> मेरा भारत महान !
> मम भारत: महत
cmon, just search for "ubuntu install lamp" via google..
or google for "download ubuntu", select the stable branch (karmic),
install it, and then type this into a terminal window:
sudo apt-get install apache2 mysql5 php5
from there, running LAMP development on linux should be a breeze for you.
lecode.com(?) link.
My other components, visCanvasLoaderGraphic/Icon and buttonAnimated
(jQuery based), are not available online anywhere.
But you may pass them around of course, as per open source contract styles..
Good luck,
and take care of your loved ones, as i am doing atm.
Greetings,
Rene Veerman
Some
yea i'm not the only one with those type of problems. sometimes times
slows down in my room so much not even my speakers sound normal
anymore; equipment that doesn't work (despite being crappy and known
by it's patterns of refusal to work; still EXTRA abnormal since about
a week or so)...
it sound
hey, i did not fake that cc header on my last mail. i just hit
reply-all and added php-general because i find it significant for this
list too..
and guys, i'm very very sorry to have ever used "walk over to
you"-language against fellow programmers,
i'll try to refrain from such behaviour in the f
hello world :)
yea, i have some exp with coding and medical science too..
i'm not a packager of any ubuntu "software center" stuff, but i have
built and released open source software before..
it's usually stored at http://mediabeez.ws/ but the computer that's
running on has crashed and acted very
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 08:11 +0200, Rene Veerman wrote:
>
> right now my cms is 2D, and indeed most of the graphics are static then.
>
> but i have plans to lift it into 3D, with "rooms" interacting via
> av
+1 for top-posting..
proper nettiquette is to put replies beneath the quotes you're
replying to, and deleting the rest.
ultimately this 'rule' of bottomposting is laziness of the ones who
like that style of quoting.
they want everyone to conform to their favorite method, so they can
read more eff
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
> On 24 Mar 2010, at 20:34, Rene Veerman wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Ashley Sheridan
>> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 22:15 +0200, Rene Veerman wrote:
>> Do you have any proof of this &
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 6:13 AM, Hans Åhlin wrote:
>I admit that if there were native support for threading I
> would use it. But I don´t want the support for threading if it
> slowdown the performance.
hmm i bet you can use any feature of php to slow things down..
i think what's been proven by
Rene:
>and btw, use of sql where other solutions (like shared mem and threading!) is
>exactly what i'm against.
should read "where other solutions (...) are very likely to work
better / more efficiently"..
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Rene Veerman wrote:
> On Wed,
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Sancar Saran wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 March 2010 21:42:53 Tommy Pham wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Sancar Saran
> wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 24 March 2010 03:17:56 Tommy Pham wrote:
>> >> Let's go back to my 1st e-commerce example. The manufacturers
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
> Are you suggesting that you need to be a guru in C to write threaded C code?
> I think the word you're looking for is competent.
plz dont make me repeat myself, i've already indicated my reasons as
to why i want to keep my codebase in 1
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 22:15 +0200, Rene Veerman wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Ashley Sheridan
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > So you're basically saying that you'd discount anyone who o
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:21 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
>
>
> Rene Veerman wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Robert Cummings
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Rene Veerman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Robert C
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
>
>
> So you're basically saying that you'd discount anyone who opposes you
> purely because you think you know best?
>
> Nice attitude.
>
I ain't saying that at all, nor did i intend to imply it.
In fact it's the anti-threading/shared-mem
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 21:50 +0200, Rene Veerman wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
> > Rene Veerman wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Robert Cummings
>
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:45 PM, la...@garfieldtech.com
wrote:
> On 3/24/10 2:33 PM, Rene Veerman wrote:
>
>>> It's a debate. The dev team consider proposals and weigh in on the
>>> merits. I
>>> was a proponent for goto support during the developmen
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
> Rene Veerman wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Robert Cummings
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Rene Veerman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Robert Cummings
&
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
>
>
> Rene Veerman wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Robert Cummings
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Rene Veerman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Jochem Maas wrote:
>
> Someone who respects you will buy you a sandwich if you need it.
i'd rather build products that are useful enough to be sold, than to
wait for anti-starvation handouts gained from respect.
>
> But seemingly you're only interested in leverag
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
>
>
> Rene Veerman wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Robert Cummings
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Rene Veerman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> php is not a hammer, its a programming lan
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
>
>
> Rene Veerman wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Robert Cummings
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Rene Veerman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> talk to me about this some other time.
&
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
> Rene Veerman wrote:
>>
>> unless the actual php development team would like to weigh in on this
>> matter of course.
>
> Wrong list. Subscribe to internals.
>
>> yes, i do consider it that important
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
> Rene Veerman wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
>>>
>>> Rene Veerman wrote:
>>>
>>>> again:
>>>> a) you're determining the contents of my
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
> Rene Veerman wrote:
>>
>> php is not a hammer, its a programming language.
>
> It's hard to discuss anything with someone who doesn't comprehend a
> metaphor.
haha. "comprehend". you mean &quo
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
> Rene Veerman wrote:
>>
>> talk to me about this some other time.
>>
>> atm i'm having an argument with per and his kind about their very very
>> annoying behaviour of determining my toolset for me
nice code, but i'd like it better if the comments were in english ;)
the only thing i see missing is some proper error reporting (in case
bit.ly is down or has changed api specs)
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Igor Escobar wrote:
> Hi Guys!
>
> Can you help me to test my new library?
> It's ab
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Yousif Masoud wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Rene Veerman wrote:
>>
>> Hi..
>>
>> As a way to take a few steps back from the kinda heated "when will php
>> grow up and support threading" thread, i'm re
Hi..
As a way to take a few steps back from the kinda heated "when will php
grow up and support threading" thread, i'm requesting you people list
how you scale from 1 server to many servers; what's called cloud
computing.
In particular, i'm interested in how to set up an application that
deals wi
ning a new thread to discuss this wider issue.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Daniel Egeberg wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:27, Rene Veerman wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Stuart Dallas
>>> I find it curious and amusing that you think the lack of threading suppo
using php.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Per Jessen wrote:
> Rene Veerman wrote:
>
>> b) to me it's a matter of keeping php attuned with the market trends.
>> this thread forces me to reconsider my choice of language, because i
>> do code to maybe get as big as f
how about having a threaded php server query 10 mysql servers at the
same time? 10 results in .1 seconds!
and dont start with 'apache will handle that', there are cases where
you're best off doing it in php, so you can gather/calculate relations
from the data off 10 different servers.
On Wed, Mar
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Stuart Dallas
> I find it curious and amusing that you think the lack of threading support
> means PHP is somehow living in the dark ages. But yeah, complaining that the
> FREE tool you've CHOSEN to use doesn't support the feature YOU want... yeah,
> that's the w
yea right..
i really want to keep my code base in 1 language, because that
simplifies everything later on imo.
you people, who are against the evolotion of php towards cloud
computing, would force me to do mixed-languages projects or even
rewrite large sections of my codebase if as i want, i keep
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
> On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:36, Rene Veerman wrote:
>
>> unless the actual php development team would like to weigh in on this
>> matter of course.
>>
>> yes, i do consider it that important.
>>
>> these
e.
Respect cannot be used to buy bread and butter.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 11:56 +0200, Rene Veerman wrote:
>
> sad and pathetic? how about "revealing".
>
> i can call your sad and pathetic for:
> - insist
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Tommy Pham wrote:
>
> Funny you should mention all that. Let's say that you're longer with
> that company, either by direct employment or contract consultant.
> You've implemented C because you need 'thread'. Now your replacement
> comes in and has no clue about
e kind where axes
and such are used to settle the issue.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Peter Lind wrote:
> On 24 March 2010 10:38, Rene Veerman wrote:
>> and if threading and shared memory aren't implemented, then hey, the
>> php dev team can build something else in that
and if threading and shared memory aren't implemented, then hey, the
php dev team can build something else in that these naysayers DO need
eh...
lol...
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Rene Veerman wrote:
> unless the actual php development team would like to weigh in on this
>
unless the actual php development team would like to weigh in on this
matter of course.
yes, i do consider it that important.
these nay-sayers usually also lobby the dev-team to such extent that
these features would actually not make it into php.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Rene Veerman
s and the weboutput
they produce..
thanks for opening my eyes and telling to abandon ship in time.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
> Heh, you guys are funny!
>
> On 24 Mar 2010, at 08:58, Rene Veerman wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Per
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
> Rene Veerman wrote:
>
>> again:
>> a) you're determining the contents of my toolset, without it affecting
>> you at all. the way you want it php will degrade into a toy language.
>
> Rene, it seems to m
exactly. the knock-on problems you mentioned are well solved and well
documented.
realtime programmers using threads have to get their heads around it
on their first realtime project.
i don't like doing my code in c(++), or worse; having to interface
between c(++) and php.
i chose php because my c
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
> Rene Veerman wrote:
>
>> popular : facebook youtube etc
>>
>
> Rene, I must be missing something here. That sort of size implies
> millions in advertising revenue, so why are we discussing how much
> performance
e off to have strangers
determining my toolset and/or lifestyle for me.
that's why i got rude. no other reason.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 10:28 +0200, Rene Veerman wrote:
>
> funny how i've been topposting for over a year
funny how i've been topposting for over a year here and the complaints start
when i tell some people not to butt into my business and choice of tools.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 10:07 +0200, Rene Veerman wrote:
>
> and i like
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
> By advocating that thread support does not belong in PHP, I am in no way
> determining what you (or anyone else) may or may not do. You are a
> free individual and free to choose the programming language and
> paradigm that is best suited to
so your systems represent all the software problems out there in the world?
or your experience does?
hard to believe.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
> Rene Veerman wrote:
>>
>> jeez dude, you're assuming that all software problems are best solved
popular : facebook youtube etc
and you're still trying to impose a toolset on me. i think it's not
strange to ask a programming language support basic hardware
architecture features as they evolve into mainstream.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
> Rene
ssing this with you.
and i like top-posting. a lot.
you may wanna stop trying to change the ways of others, especially if
they don't interfere with what YOU may and may not do.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
> Rene Veerman wrote:
>
>> stop bashing the p
2010 at 9:55 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
> Rene Veerman wrote:
>>
>> and btw, complexity of design can go up considerably when you have to
>> deal with more than 1 php and 1 mysql server, because the language
>> forces inefficient constructs _and_ is "stuck on 1
look per, i for one build systems designed to scale to popular levels.
that means that whatever i can squeeze out of a single machine will
save me money. quite a lot, coz as you know dedicated hosting gets
very expensive when you have to buy fast machines.
threading features and persistent shared
and btw, complexity of design can go up considerably when you have to
deal with more than 1 php and 1 mysql server, because the language
forces inefficient constructs _and_ is "stuck on 1 server"
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Rene Veerman wrote:
> throw more hardware at it?
throw more hardware at it?
how about you not butt into my business and how i save costs eh..
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
> Tommy Pham wrote:
>
>> The company started small. As their business grows because they have
>> products & services that do not exist in the marketpla
stop bashing the people who DO have a use for threading and other
advanced concepts eh.
just because you don't have a use for it, it shouldn't be included?!
kinda arrogant.
also kinda arrogant: how do you know the guy needing threading is not
working on projects many times as complex as your own
Hi..
in an effort to write better code i'd like to know good strategies for
unit testing.
automated testing of code.
the fact that my code can undergo rapid changes has kept me back so far.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
hmm i use scripted languages because i prefer and they allow/force
simple-to-read-code.
but that does not mean a scripted language can't evolve to expose
"complicated" code constructs like multi-threading and daemon-building
in a simple manner too.
i'd prefer it if a language like PHP can be used
ExecSum:
* +1 for better threading features in PHP.
* overloading = inheritance?
* listreaders plz allow ppl to vent some frustration without
starting a flamewar.
Threading can be implemented in PHP with an
fopen('http://yourserver.com/url')->fread()_all_threads+usleep(50ms)->fclose()+proces
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 7:28 AM, wrote:
> Duly noted. Thanks for baring with me on this one guys!
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rene Veerman
> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 07:26:24
> To: Watson Blair
> Subject: Re: [PHP]
is this file you need on your local server or truely on another machine?
and if it's on another machine, why do you need to include() it from there?
why not make a local copy as was suggested earlier?
there are many reasons not to include php scripts off other servers,
esp if the servers involved
i'd go with "tags" over categories, because you can add multiple tags
to a single blog post.
table posts:
postID integer
...
table post_tags:
postID integer
tagID integer
tagPercentageApplies float /* optional, not the industry standard */
table tags:
tagID integer
tagName varchar
On Sat, Mar
thanks.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 15:25 +0100, Rene Veerman wrote:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phpmyadmin/+bug/541922
>
> phpmyadmin is on strike :(
>
> can anyone recommend a good alternative? auto-s
another option: adodb.sf.net.
and yep, i'm fully for using a db abstraction layer.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> (just a warning -- as a relative newbie to PHP, i'll probably have
> the occasional dumb question. just humour me.)
>
> i'm looking at some existing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phpmyadmin/+bug/541922
phpmyadmin is on strike :(
can anyone recommend a good alternative? auto-scaling print function preferred.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
"field"?
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:46 AM, madunix wrote:
> can any one give a complete sample script how to retrieve data content
> from web (jpg, pdf, field).
>
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
hmm.. seems easier to me to push a filetree of .php's with wrote:
> At 8:55 PM -0400 3/16/10, Adam Richardson wrote:
>>
>> That said, I'm not taking exception with those who don't use the short
>> tag, only with those who say I shouldn't.
>
> Exception or not, it's still your choice and using shor
Thanks for the links..
But i think i'll keep at it on my own. I may be interested to set up a
competitor to the companies of which you gave links.
I've built a nice datamodel today, which i think will return even
better results than zemanta.
But what do you mean by "linked data", Nathan?
On Wed,
at NLP
as it is results in much ambiguity on several levels of it's
operation.
It's an interesting problem though, and probably a profitable one, so
i'm going to spend some time trying to come up with something better
from scratch.
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Rene Veerman wr
i dunno about overriding the entire php function, but you can disable
mail() in the virtualhost section of your apache config with the
following line:
php_value disabled_functions mail
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Stanislaw V. Smetanin
wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> the problem:
> I want to disable
maybe adding a wrote:
> At 5:54 PM + 3/15/10, Jochem Maas wrote:
>>
>> Op 3/13/10 3:49 PM, Jorge Gomes schreef:
>>>
>>> First of all, i recommend the use of normal php tags ()
>>> because
>>> the short tags are atm marked as* **DEPRECATED*.
>>
>> that's a documentation error.
>>
>>>
>>> You
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Ryan Sun wrote:
> just utilize include_path directive in php.ini
yea, or via ini_set('include_path', );
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
maybe you should be foreach()ing with references?
php.net : search "foreach" :
As of PHP 5, you can easily modify array's elements by preceding
$value with &. This will assign reference instead of copying the
value.
This is possible only if iterated array can be referenced (i.e. is variable),
jumploader.com might be interesting to you..
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Richard H Lee wrote:
> p.general,
>
> I have a form with 75 or so file input controls:
> Usually when I submit the form, I only upload two or so files. So in the
> post request, it sends the two files along with the ot
On shared hosting, you usually can't change the 30 sec max timeout on
the server..
So long polling >30s is not possible.
Short polling could be the answer, which can be done with ajax (see
jquery.com) from javascript, especially if you keep the cost of "are
there any new events for this client" d
1 - 100 of 268 matches
Mail list logo
