Richard Heyes wrote:
I have less issues
with Chrome and its beta
Not thrashing my HDD is also kinda basic, but Chrome 0.2 was more than
happy to do that.
Thrashing? That's not a bug... it's a feature and that thrashing was
chrome indexing (read harvesting information) your hard drive.
Mar
tedd wrote:
At 2:40 PM -0400 8/29/08, Mark Weaver wrote:
Hi All,
Go figure... I sat down today to get some more work on my current
project; I got to a certain point where I need to step through an
array with a foreach loop. I found that I need to test for the
current pointer position of the
Jochem Maas wrote:
Mark Weaver schreef:
Hi All,
Go figure... I sat down today to get some more work on my current
project; I got to a certain point where I need to step through an
array with a foreach loop. I found that I need to test for the
current pointer position of the array, but I
Hi All,
Go figure... I sat down today to get some more work on my current
project; I got to a certain point where I need to step through an array
with a foreach loop. I found that I need to test for the current pointer
position of the array, but I haven't a clue as to how this might be
accomp
Robert Cummings wrote:
function setCal($h=0,$m=0,$s=0,$offset,$dayVal=1){
$stamp = date('U',mktime($h,$m,$s, $offset,$dayVal,date('Y')));
I don't really want to say "I told you so", but that's one of the two
lines I denoted as
Mark Weaver wrote:
Hi all,
I've put this off as long as possible, however I think I've reached an
impasse.
I've got an application that I've been writing. One of the modules for
this app is an event calendar. I've got the calendar to the place where
it displays the
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 16:47 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
Out of curiosity.. have you thought about reworking your premise? Using
prev, current, and next is extremely sloppy IMHO. Additionally, it
prevents bookmarking a specific calendar date. Why don't you have a date
par
Robert Cummings wrote:
Out of curiosity.. have you thought about reworking your premise? Using
prev, current, and next is extremely sloppy IMHO. Additionally, it
prevents bookmarking a specific calendar date. Why don't you have a date
parameter that indicates the year and month? If no such field
Mark Weaver wrote:
Hi all,
I've put this off as long as possible, however I think I've reached an
impasse.
I've got an application that I've been writing. One of the modules for
this app is an event calendar. I've got the calendar to the place where
it displays the
Robert Cummings wrote:
function getStamp($dateStr,$dayVal=1){
return date('U',mktime(0,0,0, $dateStr,$dayVal,date('Y')));
}
^
^
Hi all,
I've put this off as long as possible, however I think I've reached an
impasse.
I've got an application that I've been writing. One of the modules for
this app is an event calendar. I've got the calendar to the place where
it displays the current month as well as previous and future
Richard Heyes wrote:
I do not agree that creating a database which is normalised to3NF is a
waste of time.
It isn't always, but it is sometimes. When time is a (significant)
factor, getting something up and running (which has acceptable
performance) may be more impotant than creating a techni
Ryan S wrote:
Hey everyone,
A bit of a puzzle here, dont know if this is a JS problem or PHP or FF or
just me.
(My money is on the last one :p )
Here's what I am trying to do:
In a form I have a listbox with the values 1-5, and under the listbox i have a with the id of
"recips" (like
Richard Heyes wrote:
So, if I create a user object, set the properties of said user object
and store that object in the user session will that object be
available throughout the application from the session?
Yes. Just remember to include the class definition before you start the
session on su
Hi All,
I've got something on my little mind, and please keep in mind I'm still
somewhat new to PHP Oop, so please excuse my silly ass if I ask
something that should be obvious.
I've got an application that I'm re-writing from PERL to PHP Oop. At the
beginning of the application, at log in,
tedd wrote:
Mark:
You said:
I'm gonna shit and go blind cause I haven't got a clue...
and
The only thing preventing me from gouging out my eyes right now is ...
Are you sure that programming is right for you?
It sounds like you're going to hurt yourself. This was just a cookie. :-)
Jim Lucas wrote:
Mark Weaver wrote:
Andrew Ballard wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Mark Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Thank you Andrew... Now it all makes perfect sense. Good grief!
there's
so much to learn. It seems that Java was easier. ;)
That's not speci
Andrew Ballard wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Mark Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thank you Andrew... Now it all makes perfect sense. Good grief! there's
so much to learn. It seems that Java was easier. ;)
That's not specific to PHP. It's just how http wo
Andrew Ballard wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 9:31 PM, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 9:11 PM, Mark Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
[snip!]
> Cookie Test Page
> ==
> if (isset($_COOKIE["co
Hi all,
I suspect I already know part of the answer to this, but I'm not sure
which way to go with it. I've got a project I'm working on and one of
the things it's got to do is set cookies and then read them later. When
the app was first written I was doing everything in PERL and cookies are
PHP General Users Mailing List wrote:
testing
so I wasn't imagining things then?
--
Mark
-
the rule of law is good, however the rule of tyrants just plain sucks!
Real Tax Reform begins with getting rid of the IRS.
==
Powered
Casey wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Sudhakar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i need to connect to the linux server using an editor. can anyone suggest
which would be an ideal linux editor to connect to the server.
apart from the ip address, username and password are there any other detail
Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Mark Weaver wrote:
Andrew Ballard wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Mark Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi all,
I'm wondering if anyone else happens to be using Mozilla Thunderbird
and
seeing this behavior, and a
tedd wrote:
At 11:22 AM -0400 3/22/08, Greg Bowser wrote:
Yeah. I always forget to reply to all.
I always reply to all and then cut out everything that isn't
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know, there's probably a better way, but that's what I do.
Cheers,
tedd
Just in case you "Do" have access to
tedd wrote:
At 11:22 AM -0400 3/22/08, Greg Bowser wrote:
Yeah. I always forget to reply to all.
I always reply to all and then cut out everything that isn't
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know, there's probably a better way, but that's what I do.
Cheers,
tedd
That's what I've been doing as well
Andrew Ballard wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Mark Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I'm wondering if anyone else happens to be using Mozilla Thunderbird and
seeing this behavior, and also if this behavior is a feature or a bug.
When I hit the reply button to r
Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
The list admin, if uses a program called ezlm (or something similar), it
adds the List-Id or the Newsgroups header which also helps.
They must have it.
hmmm... I wonder if Sylpheed for Windows will handle this? I'll have to
take a look.
--
Mark
"If you have fo
Brandon Orther wrote:
I just signed back up to the list recently, but it was like this 5 years ago
when I was still on it. I have always wondered why they didn't have that.
It seems like they are pushing people to submit their solutions to the
person with the question.
Kind Regards,
Brandon Ort
Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
Greg Bowser wrote:
Yeah. I always forget to reply to all.
The problem is with the headers. Whereas other lists have a reply-to:
in the email headers, this list does not. It
annoys
the hell out of me.
Why in the bloody hell doesn't the list admin simply "add" t
Hi all,
I'm wondering if anyone else happens to be using Mozilla Thunderbird and
seeing this behavior, and also if this behavior is a feature or a bug.
When I hit the reply button to respond to a message most of the time the
actual sender's address is the one the message is being sent to rath
Al wrote:
Seems like this does what you are attempting.
if(DEBUG_MODE) // TRUE for debug only
{
ini_set("display_errors", "on"); //use off if users will see them
error_reporting(E_ALL);
echo 'Error display and logging on ';
}
If I understand this correctly this "if" statement di
Al wrote:
int file_put_contents ( string $filename, mixed $data [, int $flags [,
resource $context]] )
This function is identical to calling fopen(), fwrite() and fclose()
successively to write data to a file.
This native function does it for you
Very nice! I wasn't aware of this one. Tha
Dave Goodchild wrote:
Why are you writing a logging class? Why not use error_log and enable error
logging?
two reasons actually,
1. learning OOP for PHP, so the more I practice at it the better I get.
2. the logging that's being done with this class is done primarily for
debugging during th
Peter Ford wrote:
Mark Weaver wrote:
Hi all,
I've been lurking and reading now for some time, but have decided to
come out of the shadows cause I've got an issue that's gonna drive me
crazy!
I'm developing an application and within this application is a class
that is
Hi all,
I've been lurking and reading now for some time, but have decided to
come out of the shadows cause I've got an issue that's gonna drive me crazy!
I'm developing an application and within this application is a class
that is very simple and only serves a singular purpose - to make log
entr
35 matches
Mail list logo
