Hi All,
I have a strange problem with php-fpm, I checkd lots of document, but I
can't fix it.
I'm using a Freebsd 91 server to host my website. Nginx and php-fpm 5.4.13
and mysql are using.
The hardware of my server is
12Core CPUs,
32G memory
6 HDD used as a Raidz2 array to host website
2 SSD used
I started building one at my last job, though it was part of a framework I
was developing. I knew I was going to need to authenticate against both
LDAP and old-fashioned database username/md5-password columns. (Ah, legacy
user databases.)
If it would be useful, I could dig out what I had and try
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Sorin Badea wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> I think a simple Google search would be faster. Anyway, an unified way for
> 3rd party authentication doesn't exist from my knowledge, but for Persona
> you could use the sample from mozilla github account
> https://github.com/mozill
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 12:25 AM, David OBrien wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Mark wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I stumbled upon this payment library: http://ci-merchant.org/ which
>> abstracts the different payment backends away and exposes a new easy
>> to use interface for the app deve
Hi Mark,
I think a simple Google search would be faster. Anyway, an unified way for
3rd party authentication doesn't exist from my knowledge, but for Persona
you could use the sample from mozilla github account
https://github.com/mozilla/browserid-cookbook .
Good luck,
Sorin!
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Mark wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I stumbled upon this payment library: http://ci-merchant.org/ which
> abstracts the different payment backends away and exposes a new easy
> to use interface for the app developer to use. Thus making it very
> easy to use different payment pro
Hi,
I stumbled upon this payment library: http://ci-merchant.org/ which
abstracts the different payment backends away and exposes a new easy
to use interface for the app developer to use. Thus making it very
easy to use different payment providers.
I was wondering if something like that is also e
> Thanks for this - I'll experiment and see if I have it. Basically I never
> read the strtotime doc close enough to get past the word "now" in the
> syntax. Obviously it is EXACTLY what I needed.
$var = strtotime('now');
Is the same as
$var = time();
Unless of course, I didn't understand wha
On 4/1/2013 2:32 PM, Mattias Thorslund wrote:
On 4/1/13 11:15 AM, Mattias Thorslund wrote:
On 4/1/13 11:05 AM, Jim Giner wrote:
I'm looking for some ideas on how to handle the following get a
datetime value that is relative to a specific future date when
presented with a partial day &time value
On 4/1/13 11:15 AM, Mattias Thorslund wrote:
On 4/1/13 11:05 AM, Jim Giner wrote:
I'm looking for some ideas on how to handle the following get a
datetime value that is relative to a specific future date when
presented with a partial day &time value.
Specifically, I have an appl that requires
On 4/1/13 11:05 AM, Jim Giner wrote:
I'm looking for some ideas on how to handle the following get a
datetime value that is relative to a specific future date when
presented with a partial day &time value.
Specifically, I have an appl that requires some lengthy input
involving days and times.
I'm looking for some ideas on how to handle the following get a datetime
value that is relative to a specific future date when presented with a
partial day &time value.
Specifically, I have an appl that requires some lengthy input involving
days and times. I have streamlined the d/e effort so
I am putting together an application where we are almost exclusively
using stored procedures in MySQL because most of the heavy lifting (as
it should be) is done in the database.
I have exactly one situation where I need to execute a stored procedure
and while returning the results if I run a
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 09:50:58 +0300, Sorin Badea wrote:
>
> No spam filters for this list ?
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Adil Adil wrote:
>
>> http://www.SLIME-BALL-SPAMMER.com/clvrcng/nikoffbkvvnjjcgwapmay.xmhpwcbrd
Obviously not, BECAUSE YOU WERE ABLE TO RE-POST
THE !$#@^%#*"% URL FOR THE
14 matches
Mail list logo
