On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 22:50 +0200, iostream wrote:
> If you want to execute some code...
>
> I'm sure you've all heard of the new "goes to" operator by now, but I
> hope it might be new to somebody.
>
>$i = 10;
>while ($i --> 0) { // while $i goes to 0
> echo $i ."\n";
>}
Okay,
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 18:06 -0400, Jim Giner wrote:
> I've read thru 9 responses to the OP and not one of you mentioned that
> the code presented is problematic in itself. Very forgiving, but
> perhaps someone should have suggested that he post "actual code" when
> looking for help in the futur
On 05-10-2012 22:50, iostream wrote:
If you want to execute some code...
I'm sure you've all heard of the new "goes to" operator by now, but I
hope it might be new to somebody.
$i = 10;
while ($i --> 0) { // while $i goes to 0
echo $i ."\n";
}
Haha, nice one :)
Also: don't top
If you want to execute some code...
I'm sure you've all heard of the new "goes to" operator by now, but I
hope it might be new to somebody.
$i = 10;
while ($i --> 0) { // while $i goes to 0
echo $i ."\n";
}
On 2012-10-05 22:34, Steven Staples wrote:
Subject: [PHP] Friday - Return o
That just sounds like a pun than anything else though.
We require new Brainteaser;
On 2012-10-05 22:36, Jonathan Sundquist wrote:
It means we require more cowbell.
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Steven Staples wrote:
Subject: [PHP] Friday - Return of Brain Teasers
About five-and-a-ha
It means we require more cowbell.
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Steven Staples wrote:
> > Subject: [PHP] Friday - Return of Brain Teasers
> >
> > About five-and-a-half years ago, we had a brainteasers thread going
> > on[1]. Last year it was briefly resurrected[2], and both times got some
> Subject: [PHP] Friday - Return of Brain Teasers
>
> About five-and-a-half years ago, we had a brainteasers thread going
> on[1]. Last year it was briefly resurrected[2], and both times got some
> good content and dialogue going. So I'd like to reprise the thread in
> 2012, as well. Those
Christopher Walken? Is that you?
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Daniel Brown wrote:
> About five-and-a-half years ago, we had a brainteasers thread
> going on[1]. Last year it was briefly resurrected[2], and both times
> got some good content and dialogue going. So I'd like to reprise th
About five-and-a-half years ago, we had a brainteasers thread
going on[1]. Last year it was briefly resurrected[2], and both times
got some good content and dialogue going. So I'd like to reprise the
thread in 2012, as well. Those of you connected to me on Facebook
(parasane) or Twitter (@oi
On 10/5/2012 8:09 AM, David McGlone wrote:
On Thursday, October 04, 2012 10:41:17 PM Jim Giner wrote:
On 10/4/2012 10:15 PM, David McGlone wrote:
I hope I'm not being a pest.
I've played with the return and echo so much today I've finally realized
I'm going in circles. But I can say I understa
On Thursday, October 04, 2012 11:37:06 PM Bastien Koert wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Jim Giner
wrote:
> > On 10/4/2012 10:15 PM, David McGlone wrote:
> >> I hope I'm not being a pest.
> >>
> >> I've played with the return and echo so much today I've finally realized
> >> I'm
> >> go
On Thursday, October 04, 2012 10:41:17 PM Jim Giner wrote:
> On 10/4/2012 10:15 PM, David McGlone wrote:
> > I hope I'm not being a pest.
> >
> > I've played with the return and echo so much today I've finally realized
> > I'm going in circles. But I can say I understand it more than ever.
> >
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
