-Original Message-
From: Chris Purves [mailto:ch...@northfolk.ca]
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 8:26 PM
To: php-general General
Subject: [PHP] help with preg_match
Hello,
I am trying to use preg_match to match something from an html file.
Within the html file is some text that looks lik
On Jun 3, 2012, at 17:28, "Chris Purves" wrote:
> I know that the text ends 'end', but I don't know what the Something,
> something is. I am using preg_match as follows:
>
> preg_match('/[^>]*end/',$curl_response,$matches);
>
> I want to match 'end' and everything before it that is not '>'.
You
Hello,
I am trying to use preg_match to match something from an html file.
Within the html file is some text that looks like:
Something, something end
I know that the text ends 'end', but I don't know what the Something,
something is. I am using preg_match as follows:
preg_match('/[^>]*en
Lester Caine wrote:
>Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>> How is Google Chrome a bigger security risk than the other popular
>browsers, Fx and IE?
>>
>> I was under the impression it was more secure than either of those.
>
>License Conditions ... They may have removed the original landgrab
>section, but
>
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
How is Google Chrome a bigger security risk than the other popular browsers, Fx
and IE?
I was under the impression it was more secure than either of those.
License Conditions ... They may have removed the original landgrab section, but
there is still a potential for Go
Lester Caine wrote:
>Matijn Woudt wrote:
>> BTW, There's a website [1] that has all the information and even a
>> tool for checking what your site does with cookies.
>>
>> - Matijn
>>
>> [1]http://www.cookielaw.org/
>
>Which fails at the first security hurdle!
>It requires Google Chrome, which
Matijn Woudt wrote:
BTW, There's a website [1] that has all the information and even a
tool for checking what your site does with cookies.
- Matijn
[1]http://www.cookielaw.org/
Which fails at the first security hurdle!
It requires Google Chrome, which is bigger black hole as far as my custome
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Matijn Woudt wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Ashley Sheridan
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Al wrote:
>>
>>>Disabled cookies use to be a problem years ago. What's your experience
>>>these days.
>>>
>>>I need it for my session ID. As I read the docs, the old method
Matijn Woudt wrote:
>On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Ashley Sheridan
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Al wrote:
>>
>>>Disabled cookies use to be a problem years ago. What's your
>experience
>>>these days.
>>>
>>>I need it for my session ID. As I read the docs, the old method of
>>>appending it
>>>to the UR
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
>
>
> Al wrote:
>
>>Disabled cookies use to be a problem years ago. What's your experience
>>these days.
>>
>>I need it for my session ID. As I read the docs, the old method of
>>appending it
>>to the URL is a security issue.
>>
>>I can obv
Al wrote:
>Disabled cookies use to be a problem years ago. What's your experience
>these days.
>
>I need it for my session ID. As I read the docs, the old method of
>appending it
>to the URL is a security issue.
>
>I can obviously save the ID in a temp file which can be read by all the
>pages
Disabled cookies use to be a problem years ago. What's your experience these
days.
I need it for my session ID. As I read the docs, the old method of appending it
to the URL is a security issue.
I can obviously save the ID in a temp file which can be read by all the pages
needing it.
Al..
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 4:48 PM, oliver gondža wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:35:28 +0200, Matijn Woudt wrote:
>
>> It does not state it works only at the end of the list, it states that
>> it only makes sense to use it at the end of the argument list to be
>> able to call the function with less
On Jun 3, 2012 12:05 PM, "Tedd Sperling" wrote:
>
> On May 31, 2012, at 7:45 PM, Ross McKay wrote:
>
> >> He said that this was unusual because typically such viruses are
> >> written in languages like Ruby-on-Rails and such.
> >
> > Um, really? I very much doubt that. AFAIK, most true viruses are
On May 31, 2012, at 7:45 PM, Ross McKay wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2012 13:21:07 -0400, Tedd Sperling wrote:
>
>> [...]
>> I watched a interview today where an security expert claimed that
>> the Flame Virus was written in a scripted language named lua
>> (http://www.lua.org/).
>
> That's surpris
On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:35:28 +0200, Matijn Woudt wrote:
It does not state it works only at the end of the list, it states that
it only makes sense to use it at the end of the argument list to be
able to call the function with less arguments. In case you want to use
it as suggested in [2], you c
"Tim Streater" wrote in message news:d0.7c.45755.25a3b...@pb1.pair.com...
On 03 Jun 2012 at 10:02, Tony Marston wrote:
"tamouse mailing lists" wrote in message
news:cahuc_t__sw-_yhrw4n4uqr-fa46+cebunzgehboaatrafla...@mail.gmail.com...
There is a point: if you are unfamiliar with code, wa
On 03 Jun 2012 at 10:02, Tony Marston wrote:
> "tamouse mailing lists" wrote in message
> news:cahuc_t__sw-_yhrw4n4uqr-fa46+cebunzgehboaatrafla...@mail.gmail.com...
>> There is a point: if you are unfamiliar with code, wading through
>> screens and screens of a function to find things like blo
"tamouse mailing lists" wrote in message
news:cahuc_t__sw-_yhrw4n4uqr-fa46+cebunzgehboaatrafla...@mail.gmail.com...
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Tony Marston
wrote:
On May 21, 2012, at 8:32 PM, tamouse mailing lists wrote:
A rule of thumb is no more than 50 lines per
function, most much
19 matches
Mail list logo
