On 12-05-29 07:17 AM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
>
I wasn't going to respond to this thread because I think it's a largely
> ridiculous topic, but some of the responses have scared me. Sir Cummings
> (hopefully) sarcastic response about using a 5px font size demonstrated
> how daft it is to base funct
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Paul M Foster wrote:
> OMG in alpha order?! At best, I might group them together by function
> type, with some comment notation in the file. But not alpha order. I
> prefer not to have "forward declares" in my files, so I generally
> arrange functions so that thos
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:56:47AM -0400, Tedd Sperling wrote:
> On May 29, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
>
> > -snip- Besides, truth is subjective, but then so is everything,
> > including that assertion.
> >
> > -Stuart
>
> You reply was longer than my monitor was high so I can't gi
On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 17:06 -0400, Paul M Foster wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 08:52:46AM +0100, Tony Marston wrote:
>
> > On May 21, 2012, at 8:32 PM, tamouse mailing lists wrote:
> > > A rule of thumb is no more than 50 lines per
> > > function, most much less. Back in the day when we didn'
On May 29, 2012, at 5:06 PM, Paul M Foster wrote:
>
> I think a lot of coders try to be kewler than the next 18 guys who are
> gonna have to look at the code, so they use a lot of "compression"
> techniques to reduce LOC.
That's not kewl to me.
> Plus, they're lazy. I'd rather see everything
> w
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 08:52:46AM +0100, Tony Marston wrote:
> On May 21, 2012, at 8:32 PM, tamouse mailing lists wrote:
> > A rule of thumb is no more than 50 lines per
> > function, most much less. Back in the day when we didn't have nifty
> > gui screens and an 24 line terminals (yay green on
> The art of software development is in taking a problem, breaking it up in to
> bite-size chunks, and putting those chunks together to form a practical
> solution. Anyone who considers themselves a "better" programmer because their
> functions are large due to their ability to handle large func
On May 29, 2012, at 11:41 AM, Adam Richardson wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Tedd Sperling wrote:
>> On 29 May 2012 18:15, Gary wrote:
>>
>>> Okay, let's assume I have three "things", A, B, and C. I need to produce
>>> an array with a list of all possible combinations of them, howeve
On May 29, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
> -snip-
> Besides, truth is subjective, but then so is everything, including that
> assertion.
>
> -Stuart
You reply was longer than my monitor was high so I can't give an immediate
reply -- I have to scroll. :-)
However, with that said, you
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Tedd Sperling wrote:
> On 29 May 2012 18:15, Gary wrote:
>
>> Okay, let's assume I have three "things", A, B, and C. I need to produce
>> an array with a list of all possible combinations of them, however many
>> there might be in those combinations: e.g. A, B, C
On 29 May 2012 18:15, Gary wrote:
> Okay, let's assume I have three "things", A, B, and C. I need to produce
> an array with a list of all possible combinations of them, however many
> there might be in those combinations: e.g. A, B, C, D, AB, AC, AD, BC,
> ABC (not sure if I've missed any!). Nor
On 29 May 2012, at 14:38, Tedd Sperling wrote:
> On May 29, 2012, at 7:17 AM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
>>
>> It's a theory, yes, and for many people it may be valid, but it's not for
>> me. The resolution of your screen; the size of your font; the colour scheme
>> you use. These should not be a fac
Le 29/05/2012 14:45, Gary a écrit :
Okay, let's assume I have three "things", A, B, and C. I need to produce
an array with a list of all possible combinations of them, however many
there might be in those combinations: e.g. A, B, C, D, AB, AC, AD, BC,
ABC (not sure if I've missed any!). Normally
On 29 May 2012 18:15, Gary wrote:
> Okay, let's assume I have three "things", A, B, and C. I need to produce
> an array with a list of all possible combinations of them, however many
> there might be in those combinations: e.g. A, B, C, D, AB, AC, AD, BC,
> ABC (not sure if I've missed any!). Nor
On 23 May 2012, at 15:14, Tedd Sperling wrote:
> Hi gang:
>
> On May 21, 2012, at 8:32 PM, tamouse mailing lists wrote:
>> A rule of thumb is no more than 50 lines per
>> function, most much less. Back in the day when we didn't have nifty
>> gui screens and an 24 line terminals (yay green on blac
On May 21, 2012, at 8:32 PM, tamouse mailing lists wrote:
> A rule of thumb is no more than 50 lines per
> function, most much less. Back in the day when we didn't have nifty
> gui screens and an 24 line terminals (yay green on black!), if a
> function exceeded one printed page, it was deemed too
16 matches
Mail list logo
