Tamara Temple wrote:
And then, we have the case of a signature being 3 times as long as the
reply
Which is less of a problem if the email client correctly trims it! I can
probably come up with a list of posts just to this list where a top poster has
included several signatures several times
On 2011-07-05, at 8:52 PM, Jim Giner wrote:
> Huh? You have a problem with a person having a spam filter that requires
> one valid response to ensure that the mail from an address is from a real
> person ONE TIME ONLY?
--
I know that I do. I monitor our web site's registrati
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 22:52, Jim Giner wrote:
> Huh? You have a problem with a person having a spam filter that requires
> one valid response to ensure that the mail from an address is from a real
> person ONE TIME ONLY?
Not that you're asking me, but yes, I do. It's not a bad idea in
prac
Huh? You have a problem with a person having a spam filter that requires
one valid response to ensure that the mail from an address is from a real
person ONE TIME ONLY?
And what do you use to cut down on spam in your in-box?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe,
On 7/3/2011 4:53 PM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
Only allowing them to access the URL once is a bad idea. If their
download fails, is corrupt, or any number of other things go wrong
(think accelerators, browser accelerators, etc) then you end up
with a lot of support mail. Better to give them access
On Jul 5, 2011, at 4:37 PM, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Imagine here a quoting of 200 lines and then a
ME TOO!
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
--
# Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
##
Development of Intranet and Embedded Syste
Hello James Moe,
Am 2011-07-05 11:12:03, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> I suspect one reason top posting is popular is that responders do not
> have to think about tidying up, just spit out a reply and move on.
Replying to what if s/he does not scroll down to read the answer of the
previou
Hello Jim Giner,
Am 2011-07-05 13:30:31, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> It's certainly not spam - it's a spam filter offered by my ISP and works
> great. The mail you are getting from it is a query asking you to reply if
> you are real and once you do, you'll never get the request again.
Do
Hello Richard Quadling,
Am 2011-07-05 17:14:18, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> But that is what "reply-all" is about.
> Person A sends an message to List B.
> I reply-all and Person A and List B get replies.
I do not like to get PMs on my cellphone from the LIST
> Hmm.
> GMail sucks at this.
Hello Jim Giner,
Am 2011-07-05 10:48:34, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> And besides - I'm sure there are PLENTY of people here who despise scrolling
> thru endless repeated paragraphs from a long list of posts just to get the
> the latest contribution to the topic.:)
>
> This newgroup ma
"James Moe" wrote in message
news:4e1353f3.6090...@sohnen-moe.com...
>
> I suspect one reason top posting is popular is that responders do not
> have to think about tidying up, just spit out a reply and move on. The
> result is a message that grows in size with every reply containing every
> use
On Jul 5, 2011, at 1:14 PM, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
Have you looked into using Evolution as an email client? It's what I
use
on Linux, and the last time I checked there were Windows binaries
available for it. It connect to MS Exchange Server if that's what you
use in the office, it's completely
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 14:04 -0400, ad...@buskirkgraphics.com wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jim Giner [mailto:jim.gi...@albanyhandball.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 1:53 PM
> > To: php-general@lists.php.net
> > Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: Top Posting
> >
> >
> > "Ashley Sheri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/05/2011 07:48 AM, Jim Giner wrote:
> And besides - I'm sure there are PLENTY of people here who despise scrolling
> thru endless repeated paragraphs from a long list of posts just to get the
> the latest contribution to the topic.:)
>
I oft
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Giner [mailto:jim.gi...@albanyhandball.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 1:53 PM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: Top Posting
>
>
> "Ashley Sheridan" wrote in message
> news:21e916f2-2a1f-4982-bc4d-9a574da92...@email.android.com.
On Jul 5, 2011, at 12:48 PM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Tamara Temple
wrote:
On Jul 5, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
$arr[] = array('name' => (string)$book->name, 'author' =>
(string)$book->author);
}
Interesting -- is the casting to string type necess
Business e-mail did not start with Outlook. Businesses have been using
e-mail long before it even showed up as an option. The de jure
standard on the Internet before that time, and before several other
clients came about was either bottom posting or intermixed responses.
This was true in e-
"Ashley Sheridan" wrote in message
news:21e916f2-2a1f-4982-bc4d-9a574da92...@email.android.com...
I've seen fake messages do that before as a way of harvesting good live
email addresses, so I regard all such messages spam now.
oh, well...
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Tamara Temple wrote:
>
> On Jul 5, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
>
>
>> $arr[] = array('name' => (string)$book->name, 'author' =>
>> (string)$book->author);
>> }
>>
>
> Interesting -- is the casting to string type necessary there? I haven't
> done that bef
Jim Giner wrote:
>It's certainly not spam - it's a spam filter offered by my ISP and
>works
>great. The mail you are getting from it is a query asking you to reply
>if
>you are real and once you do, you'll never get the request again.
>
>"Jim Lucas" wrote in message
>news:4e134676.7090...@cms
On Jul 5, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
$arr[] = array('name' => (string)$book->name, 'author' =>
(string)$book->author);
}
Interesting -- is the casting to string type necessary there? I
haven't done that before, and it seems to have worked ok...
--
PHP General Mailing List (
It's certainly not spam - it's a spam filter offered by my ISP and works
great. The mail you are getting from it is a query asking you to reply if
you are real and once you do, you'll never get the request again.
"Jim Lucas" wrote in message
news:4e134676.7090...@cmsws.com...
> On 7/5/2011 9:
On 7/5/2011 9:11 AM, Richard Quadling wrote:
> And Jim, your anti-spam measures are spamming me.
>
> So, I've blocked your anti-spam as spam.
I noticed this the other day and I blocked him as well.
Maybe this is why his mail server IP is listed as a source of spam...
http://www.mxtoolbox.com/Su
"Richard Quadling" wrote in message
news:CAKUjMCVbhbXO=ngr1lnzo-6fdahdj-r8hc73b-esotfqg+k...@mail.gmail.com...
>
> But that is what "reply-all" is about.
>
> Person A sends an message to List B.
>
> I reply-all and Person A and List B get replies.
>
> Hmm.
A new level of complexity! A person s
If you resisted sending what amounts to a duplicate email to the posters who
are 'on' the list, you wouldn't have to deal with spam filters. Don't
understand the purpose of a reply all when in essence our replies are to the
list wherein the topic originated. Those on the list will surely see a
On 5 July 2011 17:10, Jim Giner wrote:
> "Stuart Dallas" wrote in message
> news:CAJgGj58OkZLiakMMo8qmuhg68BamYOi+TLNGyzze=iyppbj...@mail.gmail.com...
>> Again, please include the list when replying!
>>
>
> But don't include the poster's email if you're replying to the list!
But that is what "re
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Jim Giner wrote:
> "Stuart Dallas" wrote in message
> news:CAJgGj58OkZLiakMMo8qmuhg68BamYOi+TLNGyzze=iyppbj...@mail.gmail.com...
> > Again, please include the list when replying!
> >
>
> But don't include the poster's email if you're replying to the list!
The gui
On Jul 5, 2011, at 12:06, Stuart Dallas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Jim Giner wrote:
>
>>
>> "Stuart Dallas" wrote in message
>>> If you're looking for a sane reason why Microsoft software is popular in
>>> the
>>> business world you're not going to find one. >
>>
>> No - you mi
On 11-07-05 11:46 AM, Louis Huppenbauer wrote:
Just use count($arr) in your for-header, as it get's executed again
for each loop.
1), array('id'=>2));
for($i=0;$i $arr[$i]['id']+1);
}
}
?>
Ok, so the extents are being updated on each pass of the loop :)
Ch
On 5 July 2011 17:08, Stuart Dallas wrote:
> Again, please include the list when replying!
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Jim Giner wrote:
>
>> **
>> if they weren't on the list, then how did they get involved in the first
>> place?
And Jim, your anti-spam measures are spamming me.
So, I've
"Stuart Dallas" wrote in message
news:CAJgGj58OkZLiakMMo8qmuhg68BamYOi+TLNGyzze=iyppbj...@mail.gmail.com...
> Again, please include the list when replying!
>
But don't include the poster's email if you're replying to the list!
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscrib
Again, please include the list when replying!
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Jim Giner wrote:
> **
> if they weren't on the list, then how did they get involved in the first
> place?
>
You don't need to be subscribed to post.
I see the bottom posting lasted a headline-worthy amount of time!
-
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Jim Giner wrote:
>
> "Stuart Dallas" wrote in message
> > If you're looking for a sane reason why Microsoft software is popular in
> > the
> > business world you're not going to find one. >
>
> No - you missed my statement's point. Not looking for anything - just
On 5 July 2011 16:48, Jim Giner wrote:
> Let the new mantra be - "Snip Your Posts!"
Consider your post snipped.
OOI. If you use Google Mail, highlighting the part of the message you
want to use and then clicking reply-all will embed only that part in
the reply.
--
Richard Quadling
Twitter : EE
"Stuart Dallas" wrote in message
> If you're looking for a sane reason why Microsoft software is popular in
> the
> business world you're not going to find one. >
No - you missed my statement's point. Not looking for anything - just
saying it is what it is. You won't find me defending M$ sof
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Kanishka wrote:
> hi this is my first post on php general mailing list, i want to read a xml
> file to retrieve data. i tried by using "DOM" and "simple xml" but i
> couldn't.
> the xml file looks like this..
>
> *
>
> the the title
> 7-6-2011
Just use count($arr) in your for-header, as it get's executed again
for each loop.
1), array('id'=>2));
for($i=0;$i $arr[$i]['id']+1);
}
}
?>
2011/7/5 Robert Cummings :
> On 11-07-05 10:48 AM, Dajka Tamás wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, that was interesting :) I think I got o
Actually business user do subscribe to use Outlook as their client. It does
not come with the OS, it is purchased on a per seat basis by every
corporation using it in the form of a license.
On the other hand Outlook Express is available as part of the os, or is
easily obtained for free. It is
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 3:29 PM, wrote:
> Anyone know how to make Outlook changes its reply position.
>
> I am using outlook 2007 and I do not find an option for this.
>
Google delivers...
http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/macros4outlook/index.php?title=QuoteFix_Macro
-Stuart
--
Stuart Da
hi this is my first post on php general mailing list, i want to read a xml
file to retrieve data. i tried by using "DOM" and "simple xml" but i
couldn't.
the xml file looks like this..
*
the the title
7-6-2011
book 1
author 1
book 2
auther 2
*
i want to put both "
not what he was asking for.
""Curtis Maurand"" wrote in message
news:4e7755d57a7a032c39e44598f3660ac7.squir...@www.xyonet.com...
>
>
>
> Jim Giner wrote:
>> outlook doesn't offer an option for
> that.
>
> ctrl-END gets you to the bottom of a message.
>
>
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://w
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Dajka Tamas wrote:
> I've bumped into an interesting thing with foreach. I really don't know, if
> this is normal working, or why it is, so I got curious.
>
> The script:
>
> foreach ( $cats as &$c ) {
> echo $c['id'];
> if ( $c['id'] <
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 10:48:34AM -0400, Jim Giner wrote:
> And besides - I'm sure there are PLENTY of people here who despise scrolling
> thru endless repeated paragraphs from a long list of posts just to get the
> the latest contribution to the topic.:)
>
> This newgroup may have its rul
On 05 Jul 2011 at 15:29, ad...@buskirkgraphics.com wrote:
> Since this is the 3rd time I have been chewed out for top posting.
>
> Anyone know how to make Outlook changes its reply position.
>
> I am using outlook 2007 and I do not find an option for this.
>
> I have to scroll down to the bottom
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Jim Giner wrote:
> And besides - I'm sure there are PLENTY of people here who despise
> scrolling
> thru endless repeated paragraphs from a long list of posts just to get the
> the latest contribution to the topic.:)
>
> This newgroup may have its rules, but if
Jim Giner wrote:
> outlook doesn't offer an option for
that.
ctrl-END gets you to the bottom of a message.
On 11-07-05 10:48 AM, Dajka Tamás wrote:
Thanks, that was interesting :) I think I got one step further in understanding
PHP :)
BTW, I've changed the loop to 'for' and it's working well :)
Can you show us your for loop? I'm not immediately sure how you use a
for loop to traverse a growing nu
On 11-07-05 09:40 AM, Dajka Tamas wrote:
foreach ( $cats as&$c ) {
echo $c['id'];
if ( $c['id']< 5 ) {
$c['id']++;
$cats[] = $c;
}
}
Given that you seem to want the above functi
And besides - I'm sure there are PLENTY of people here who despise scrolling
thru endless repeated paragraphs from a long list of posts just to get the
the latest contribution to the topic.:)
This newgroup may have its rules, but if bottom-posting was such a wise and
preferred method, why d
Thanks, that was interesting :) I think I got one step further in understanding
PHP :)
BTW, I've changed the loop to 'for' and it's working well :)
-Original Message-
From: Robert Cummings [mailto:rob...@interjinn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 4:45 PM
To: Dajka Tamás
Cc: php-general
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 10:29:12AM -0400, ad...@buskirkgraphics.com wrote:
> Since this is the 3rd time I have been chewed out for top posting.
>
> Anyone know how to make Outlook changes its reply position.
>
> I am using outlook 2007 and I do not find an option for this.
>
> I have to scroll
On 11-07-05 10:42 AM, Jim Giner wrote:
outlook doesn't offer an option for that.
I'm pretty sure it has a scrollbar on the side ;)
Cheers,
Rob.
--
E-Mail Disclaimer: Information contained in this message and any
attached documents is considered confidential and legally protected.
This message
On 11-07-05 10:39 AM, Dajka Tamás wrote:
Ok, but if it would be that way I shouldn't get '122334455' for second output,
no? The item count increments with every iteration of the loop.
Or you're saying that, it checks for an existance of nextitem before every
loop, and that will fail with just
On 11-07-05 10:39 AM, Dajka Tamás wrote:
Ok, but if it would be that way I shouldn't get '122334455' for second output,
no? The item count increments with every iteration of the loop.
Or you're saying that, it checks for an existance of nextitem before every
loop, and that will fail with jus
outlook doesn't offer an option for that.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Ok, but if it would be that way I shouldn't get '122334455' for second output,
no? The item count increments with every iteration of the loop.
Or you're saying that, it checks for an existance of nextitem before every
loop, and that will fail with just one element, but will always return true
w
I don't think that it does this:
if ( count($elements) == 1 ) then loop 1;
else loop normally;
It's probably more something like that:
$i=count($elements);
loop:
$i--;
if($i == 0)
$last_loop = true;
else
$last_loop = false
if($last_loop)
exit;
else
goto loop;
But aside from tha
Since this is the 3rd time I have been chewed out for top posting.
Anyone know how to make Outlook changes its reply position.
I am using outlook 2007 and I do not find an option for this.
I have to scroll down to the bottom of the email and it considers that to be
an adjustment to the origi
On 11-07-05 10:20 AM, Dajka Tamás wrote:
Hi,
Yeah, I'm really want to do that, since I'm working with the elements of the
original array ( skipped that part in sample code ).
I've tried your suggestion, but it gives the same result, so on just one input
is just gives back '1'.
Ahhh... you w
Tried, gives the same result with one element :(
What's working:
$cats = array( array( 'id' => 1 ) );
while ( $c = array_shift($cats) ) {
echo $c['id'];
if ( $c['id'] < 5 ) {
$c['id']++;
$cats[] = $c;
}
}
But this is 'while' and it pops all
Hi,
Yeah, I'm really want to do that, since I'm working with the elements of the
original array ( skipped that part in sample code ).
I've tried your suggestion, but it gives the same result, so on just one input
is just gives back '1'.
What troubles me, that foreach gives an inconsistent work
Or maybe he tried to do the following?
($c['id'] + 1));
}
}
?>
2011/7/5 Robert Cummings :
>
> On 11-07-05 09:40 AM, Dajka Tamas wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>>
>> I've bumped into an interesting thing with foreach. I really don't know,
>> if
>> this is normal working, or why it is,
On 11-07-05 09:40 AM, Dajka Tamas wrote:
Hi all,
I've bumped into an interesting thing with foreach. I really don't know, if
this is normal working, or why it is, so I got curious.
The script:
foreach ( $cats as&$c ) {
echo $c['id'];
if ( $c['id']< 5 )
Eureka!
The whole problem was my unfamiliarity with the php download page. To
others - read the choices there very carefully (which I thought I did!) to
be sure you get the "thread-safe" version.
Thanks to all who contributed, but David gets the kudos for telling me to
check the error logs fi
Hi there
I think that foreach in your first example just knowns that this
should be the last loop (as the array only contains 1 element at
start) and so stops there.
In your 2nd example however the first loop isn't the last, so the
array get's checked again, and now there's another element, so...
Hi all,
I've bumped into an interesting thing with foreach. I really don't know, if
this is normal working, or why it is, so I got curious.
The script:
foreach ( $cats as &$c ) {
echo $c['id'];
if ( $c['id'] < 5 ) {
$c['id']
Thanks David! The error log tells me that I have installed a version of PHP
that is not "thread-safe". My bad - I mis-read the download page and did in
fact acquire the wrong version. Am beginning PHP install all over again!
"David Robley" wrote in message
news:b0.f0.00402.e9df2...@pb1.pair
Jim Giner wrote:
> Hi all,
> (Hopefully I posted this in a place that can/will help me)
>
> I got curious about running php / apache on my own laptop in order to help
> my devl process, instead of writing, uploading and testing on my site.
>
> Found a nice pair of docs from "thesitewizard.com" t
68 matches
Mail list logo
