On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Alejandro Michelin Salomon (Hotmail)
wrote:
> Jim:
> In my Windows the install adds the lines :
>
> #BEGIN PHP INSTALLER EDITS - REMOVE ONLY ON UNINSTALL
> PHPIniDir "C:\PHP\"
> LoadModule php5_module "C:\PHP\php5apache2_2.dll"
>
> AddHandler application/x-httpd-php
What is your document root set to in your httpd.conf file? By default it should
be htdocs subdirectory in apache program files.
Sent from my iPod
On Jul 4, 2011, at 12:10 PM, "Jim Giner" wrote:
> Shawn,
> I added my php folder to the path but no change.
>
> "Shawn McKenzie" wrote in message
On 7/3/2011 9:37 PM, Brian Dworkin wrote:
> I would like to subscribe to this mailing list please.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Brian Dworkin
> Managing Partner
> Bright Telecom
> 201-892-9553 (mobile #)
> br...@brighttelecom.net
> http://www.brighttelecom.net
>
>
http://php.net/mailing-lis
Shawn,
I added my php folder to the path but no change.
"Shawn McKenzie" wrote in message
news:4e11e7e7.6010...@mckenzies.net...
>
> You may need to add c:\php\ to the Windows path so that the Apache mod
> can find other files it may need. If you have mysql or other extensions
> enabled in php.
On 07/04/2011 07:39 AM, Jim Giner wrote:
> Hi all,
> (Hopefully I posted this in a place that can/will help me)
>
> I got curious about running php / apache on my own laptop in order to help
> my devl process, instead of writing, uploading and testing on my site.
>
> Found a nice pair of docs fro
Jim,
What is your server root set up too? I would put the apache configuration
back to the way it was and then place php script with phpinfo() function in
it. Try to run it and see if that works.
HTH,
Chris
On Jul 4, 2011 8:14 AM, "Alejandro Michelin Salomon (Hotmail)" <
amichel...@hotmail.com>
Jim:
In my Windows the install adds the lines :
#BEGIN PHP INSTALLER EDITS - REMOVE ONLY ON UNINSTALL
PHPIniDir "C:\PHP\"
LoadModule php5_module "C:\PHP\php5apache2_2.dll"
AddHandler application/x-httpd-php .php
#END PHP INSTALLER EDITS - REMOVE ONLY ON UNINSTALL
Where is the apache version that
On 4 July 2011 13:39, Jim Giner wrote:
> Hi all,
> (Hopefully I posted this in a place that can/will help me)
>
> I got curious about running php / apache on my own laptop in order to help
> my devl process, instead of writing, uploading and testing on my site.
>
> Found a nice pair of docs from "
Hi all,
(Hopefully I posted this in a place that can/will help me)
I got curious about running php / apache on my own laptop in order to help
my devl process, instead of writing, uploading and testing on my site.
Found a nice pair of docs from "thesitewizard.com" that appeared to be
pretty well-w
On 11-07-03 04:17 PM, Kirk Bailey wrote:
ok, here's the deal; we sent someone to the paypal site for their
purchase; the site will use the palpal shopping cart. When they come
back, there needs to be a way to identify the product and the
transaction so they an get the product ONCE. Now for a sing
On Jul 4, 2011, at 2:34 AM, Tim Streater wrote:
On 04 Jul 2011 at 08:01, Stuart Dallas wrote:
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Karl DeSaulniers
wrote:
Hello Stuart,
After some closer look at the RFC Compliant manuals you suggested,
I have determined that the creator of that code was in fa
On 04 Jul 2011 at 08:01, Stuart Dallas wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
>
>> Hello Stuart,
>> After some closer look at the RFC Compliant manuals you suggested,
>> I have determined that the creator of that code was in fact RFC821
>> Compliant.
>> Being that this
@Stuart
Ah, then you are right that they were not compliant. The code is not
that old.
Thank you so much for the links and information too. Much more than I
expected.
I did not know that they were sent OS-Independent, but that makes
perfect sense.
Again, please excuse my lack of understandi
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
> Hello Stuart,
> After some closer look at the RFC Compliant manuals you suggested,
> I have determined that the creator of that code was in fact RFC821
> Compliant.
> Being that this was a code I found several years ago, RFC822 may not have
14 matches
Mail list logo
