Really? This thread is going to tangent yet again to something completely
irrelevant?
FWIW, I used some stupid "WinLIKE" JS framework by http://ceiton.com
These bastards haven't updated it since 2007
http://wiki.winlike.net/index.php/Version_History
Normally not a big deal, but they "patented"
On 11-06-05 07:28 PM, Richard Quadling wrote:
On 5 June 2011 19:15, Robert Cummings wrote:
2 words... progressive enhancement. If your browser doesn't support a
feature then it should degrade gracefully. Accessible web philosophy 101. I
hate going on to some website, especially government, and
On 11-06-05 07:28 PM, tedd wrote:
At 2:15 PM -0400 6/5/11, Robert Cummings wrote:
2 words... progressive enhancement. If your browser doesn't support
a feature then it should degrade gracefully. Accessible web
philosophy 101. I hate going on to some website, especially
government, and finding th
On 5 June 2011 19:15, Robert Cummings wrote:
> 2 words... progressive enhancement. If your browser doesn't support a
> feature then it should degrade gracefully. Accessible web philosophy 101. I
> hate going on to some website, especially government, and finding that it
> sniffs my browser and the
At 2:15 PM -0400 6/5/11, Robert Cummings wrote:
On 11-06-05 09:33 AM, Richard Riley wrote:
Geoff Shang writes:
On Sun, 5 Jun 2011, Tim Streater wrote:
Anyone whose site says that sort of crap needs a good smack.
Don't get me started on Facebook. If they don't like your browser, they
redi
At 6:29 PM +0100 6/5/11, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
I think his point is that a lot of websites ignorantly stop browsers not
on their list of compatible ones, and end up blocking browsers that
would work perfectly well, just the original developer either wasn't
aware or didn't care. This used to be
On 05-06-2011, at 10:31, Adam Tong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't set correctly the error display and reporting properties. I
> don't know what i'm doing wrong.
>
> Here is the section that i modified in php.ini:
> -
> display_errors = On
> ; Default Value: On
> ; Development Value: On
> ;
On 05 Jun 2011 at 21:28, Geoff Shang wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2011, Richard Riley wrote:
>
>> If they allowed incompatible browsers that caused havoc then before you
>> know it the great unwashed would be demanding more and better support or
>> complaining about lack of functionality. Doing what t
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Jonesy wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 00:34:30 +0100, Richard Quadling wrote:
>> http://www.exxcire.com/login.php
>>
>> If nothing more than a good "bad example".
>
> ROTFLMAO!!! "Where Experts Exchange"
> Sweet Jeezuz!
At least they have a cute 404 page. Gotta coun
On Sun, 5 Jun 2011, Richard Riley wrote:
If they allowed incompatible browsers that caused havoc then before you
know it the great unwashed would be demanding more and better support or
complaining about lack of functionality. Doing what they do they make it
very clear from day one.
This would
On 11-06-05 02:25 PM, Richard Riley wrote:
Ashley Sheridan writes:
>
I think his point is that a lot of websites ignorantly stop browsers not
on their list of compatible ones, and end up blocking browsers that
would work perfectly well, just the original developer either wasn't
aware or didn't
Ashley Sheridan writes:
> On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 19:23 +0200, Richard Riley wrote:
>
>> Geoff Shang writes:
>>
>> > On Sun, 5 Jun 2011, Richard Riley wrote:
>> >
>> >>> I don't. I just don't want them to lock out my browser just because
>> >>> they don't
>> >>> support it. Many pages which do
On 11-06-05 01:40 PM, Paul M Foster wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 01:52:15PM -0700, Daevid Vincent wrote:
and I'm "balding" from Alopecia
Me too, but in my case, it's just 'cause I'm old. ;-}
My sympathies to you both... I'm baling because I produce a lot of
testosterone >:D
Although, e
On 11-06-05 01:23 PM, Richard Riley wrote:
Geoff Shang writes:
On Sun, 5 Jun 2011, Richard Riley wrote:
I don't. I just don't want them to lock out my browser just because they don't
support it. Many pages which don't work optimally under Lynx can still be read,
which is all I'm wanting
On 11-06-05 09:33 AM, Richard Riley wrote:
Geoff Shang writes:
On Sun, 5 Jun 2011, Tim Streater wrote:
Anyone whose site says that sort of crap needs a good smack.
Don't get me started on Facebook. If they don't like your browser, they
redirect you to their"We don't support your browser p
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 01:52:15PM -0700, Daevid Vincent wrote:
> and I'm "balding" from Alopecia
Me too, but in my case, it's just 'cause I'm old. ;-}
Paul
--
Paul M. Foster
http://noferblatz.com
http://quillandmouse.com
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visi
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 19:23 +0200, Richard Riley wrote:
> Geoff Shang writes:
>
> > On Sun, 5 Jun 2011, Richard Riley wrote:
> >
> >>> I don't. I just don't want them to lock out my browser just because they
> >>> don't
> >>> support it. Many pages which don't work optimally under Lynx can st
Geoff Shang writes:
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2011, Richard Riley wrote:
>
>>> I don't. I just don't want them to lock out my browser just because they
>>> don't
>>> support it. Many pages which don't work optimally under Lynx can still be
>>> read,
>>> which is all I'm wanting to do anyway.
>>
>> They
On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 00:34:30 +0100, Richard Quadling wrote:
> http://www.exxcire.com/login.php
>
> If nothing more than a good "bad example".
ROTFLMAO!!! "Where Experts Exchange"
Sweet Jeezuz!
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.
On 05 Jun 2011 at 16:23, Geoff Shang wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2011, Richard Riley wrote:
>
>>> I don't. I just don't want them to lock out my browser just because they
>>> don't
>>> support it. Many pages which don't work optimally under Lynx can still be
>>> read,
>>> which is all I'm wanting
On Sun, 5 Jun 2011, Richard Riley wrote:
I don't. I just don't want them to lock out my browser just because they don't
support it. Many pages which don't work optimally under Lynx can still be read,
which is all I'm wanting to do anyway.
They need to or there can be unintentional side affec
>
>
> And here is the output of phpinfo():
> -
In the same phpinfo() output, what is the path/location of the php.ini
file you are using?
Loaded Configuration File D:\PHP\INI\php-cgi-fcgi.ini
for example.
--
Richard Quadling
Twitter : EE : Zend : PHPDoc
@RQuadling : e-e.com/M_2
Hi,
I can't set correctly the error display and reporting properties. I
don't know what i'm doing wrong.
Here is the section that i modified in php.ini:
-
display_errors = On
; Default Value: On
; Development Value: On
; Production Value: Off
display_startup_errors = On
; Default V
Geoff Shang writes:
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2011, Richard Riley wrote:
>
>> Why do you feel FB should support some antiquated browser that doesnt
>> support any of the newer technoogies which enable security and more
>> advanced client side rendering?
>
> I don't. I just don't want them to lock out my b
On Sun, 5 Jun 2011, Richard Riley wrote:
Why do you feel FB should support some antiquated browser that doesnt
support any of the newer technoogies which enable security and more
advanced client side rendering?
I don't. I just don't want them to lock out my browser just because they
don't su
Geoff Shang writes:
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2011, Tim Streater wrote:
>
>> Anyone whose site says that sort of crap needs a good smack.
>
> Don't get me started on Facebook. If they don't like your browser, they
> redirect you to their"We don't support your browser page". They don't even
> let
> you t
On Sun, 5 Jun 2011, Tim Streater wrote:
Anyone whose site says that sort of crap needs a good smack.
Don't get me started on Facebook. If they don't like your browser, they
redirect you to their"We don't support your browser page". They don't
even let you try with your unsupported browser,
On 4 June 2011 23:21, Sean Greenslade wrote:
> IIRC, there is a google code project for a php login system. You might want
> to check it out.
http://code.google.com/p/loginsystem-rd/
"Login system to prevent XSS, SQL Injection and CSRF"
May be of interest.
--
Richard Quadling
Twitter : EE :
On 05 Jun 2011 at 06:08, Tamara Temple wrote:
> On Jun 3, 2011, at 3:52 PM, Daevid Vincent wrote:
>> ...actually, I do have some good ones here:
>> http://daevid.com/content/examples/procmail.php
>
> "It appears your browser does not support some of the advanced
> features this site requires.
>
29 matches
Mail list logo
