At 6:07 PM -0600 3/12/11, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
On 03/12/2011 10:37 AM, tedd wrote:
> Here's a demo:
> http://php1.net/b/form-radio1/
> Don't make it more complicated than it needs be.
My point exactly! So long as the name of the name[] part is the same
they will be treated as the same
On 03/12/2011 10:37 AM, tedd wrote:
> At 9:28 PM +0200 3/11/11, Danny wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I have a form that has a long list of radio-bottons inside of it. The
>> radio-buttons are dynamically created via php and MySQL.
>>
>> Here is an example of one of the radio buttons:
>>
>> > ?>" value="0
Howdy,
Mid, Net, thanks for the tips! I actually didn't have the proper .htaccess
settings that ZF wanted, and I needed to add a router :)
Thank you both!
-Dan
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Midhun Girish wrote:
> You can also try routing in zend..
> http://codeutopia.net/blog/2007/11/16/r
At 9:28 PM +0200 3/11/11, Danny wrote:
Hi guys,
I have a form that has a long list of radio-bottons inside of it. The
radio-buttons are dynamically created via php and MySQL.
Here is an example of one of the radio buttons:
; ?>" value="0">
; ?>" value="1">
Now, when I submit this form to ano
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 23:00, Kirk Bailey wrote:
> May I have suggestions of websites I would do well to visit to improve my
> php skills? Links please, with a breif description if you would be so good.
http://php.net/links --- Overall links
http://phpbuilder.com/--- General
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:40 AM, David Hutto wrote:
>>
>> As I mentioned below, if PHP is sluggish, shouldn't it be brought up
>> to the PHP developers instead? Why would you try include more
>> complexity?
>
> I'm sure it has, it's called benchmarks. And they can't top C or
> Fortran, last I saw
>
> As I mentioned below, if PHP is sluggish, shouldn't it be brought up
> to the PHP developers instead? Why would you try include more
> complexity?
I'm sure it has, it's called benchmarks. And they can't top C or
Fortran, last I saw. But that is not the point. And did you not see my
point abou
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 1:31 AM, David Hutto wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Tommy Pham wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:06 AM, David Hutto wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Tommy Pham wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:39 PM, David Hutto wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 4:31 AM, Tommy Pham wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:22 AM, David Hutto wrote:
>> This isn't a C/PHP question, or optimization, it's a matter of PHP
>> isn't always the center of attention, in terms of a development
>> process. In each language there are advocates, and
probably so, but it it's just another discussion we should have just
for evolutions sake. Each time it takes place, new info is added by
someone.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:22 AM, David Hutto wrote:
> This isn't a C/PHP question, or optimization, it's a matter of PHP
> isn't always the center of attention, in terms of a development
> process. In each language there are advocates, and it's admirable, but
> ignorant in sight that what you're
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Tommy Pham wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:06 AM, David Hutto wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Tommy Pham wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:39 PM, David Hutto wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Tommy Pham wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11,
We're going way off-topic. Perhaps start a new thread? :)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:06 AM, David Hutto wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Tommy Pham wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:39 PM, David Hutto wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Tommy Pham wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:26 PM, David Hutto wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 1
This isn't a C/PHP question, or optimization, it's a matter of PHP
isn't always the center of attention, in terms of a development
process. In each language there are advocates, and it's admirable, but
ignorant in sight that what you're saying eliminates the rational, and
logical thought that there
Hi Kirk,
On Saturday, March 12, 2011, 4:09:24 AM, you wrote:
> On 3/11/2011 2:43 PM, Geoff Lane wrote:
> [snip]
>> You could use foreach to iterate through the post variables until you
>> encounter a match:
>>
>> foreach ($_POST as $key => $value){
>> if (substr($key, 0, 6) == "radio_") {
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Tommy Pham wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:59 PM, David Hutto wrote:
>> Optimization also becomes a more manipulative, due to the stem point
>> of your further language utilization. If you divide your languages,
>> and disperse them through a C framework, you
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Tommy Pham wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:39 PM, David Hutto wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Tommy Pham wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:26 PM, David Hutto wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Tommy Pham wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11,
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:59 PM, David Hutto wrote:
> Optimization also becomes a more manipulative, due to the stem point
> of your further language utilization. If you divide your languages,
> and disperse them through a C framework, you can utilize the languages
> in their refined form, and if
Optimization also becomes a more manipulative, due to the stem point
of your further language utilization. If you divide your languages,
and disperse them through a C framework, you can utilize the languages
in their refined form, and if any portion of an individual language
gives optimization prob
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:39 PM, David Hutto wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Tommy Pham wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:26 PM, David Hutto wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Tommy Pham wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:34 PM, David Hutto wrote:
> Although, rig
21 matches
Mail list logo
