Hi
Try BPEL. You can look at Intalio which supports BPEL and has a
community edition. You can download and try out a few examples.
I guess the big players like IBM, Oracle etc should have some BPEL based
tools.
Best regards
Sridhar
Original Message
Subject: workflow sys
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 12:32:21PM -0400, tedd wrote:
> Hi gang:
>
> I have a client who wants his employees' access to their online
> business database restricted to only times when he is logged on.
> (Don't ask why)
>
> In other words, when the boss is not logged on, then his employees
> canno
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 06:07:57PM -0500, Tamara Temple wrote:
>
> I've been in business and technology consulting for years and years,
> and very successful at getting customer's desired outcomes. I don't
> think their notions "strange" or "unusual" -- just that without
> further elicitation,
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 06:37:41PM -0500, MikeB wrote:
> Hello, I'm new to PHP and also new to using newsgroups/mailing lists
> directly. So if I make a mistake, please forgive me this once and I'll
> try to do better in the future.
>
> Please help me understand, my head is absolutely spinning an
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 02:07:12PM -0400, tedd wrote:
> At 1:47 PM -0400 9/12/10, Jason Pruim wrote:
> >>On Sep 12, 2010, at 1:33 PM, tedd wrote:
> >>So, can I do what I do (i.e., programming) without having a host?
> >>Can I install a local server at my clients location and interface
> >>all thei
On Sep 12, 2010, at 4:48 PM, tedd wrote:
At 4:05 PM -0500 9/12/10, Tamara Temple wrote:
Sounds like there are some security concerns here.
On Sep 12, 2010, at 11:32 AM, tedd wrote:
I have a client who wants his employees' access to their online
business database restricted to only times whe
On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 17:04 -0500, Tamara Temple wrote:
> On Sep 12, 2010, at 4:28 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> > On 10-09-12 05:19 PM, Michael Shadle wrote:
> >> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Tamara Temple >> > wrote:
> >>> Ok, but how do you detect if a field changes? The specific
> >>>
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Tamara Temple wrote:
> Actually, even the client-side aspect isn't good enough -- they could simply
> retype the same value in the field. Also, I'd like to not rely on JavaScript
> alone to indicate that there's been a change, since, as Ashley points out,
> someon
On Sep 12, 2010, at 4:28 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
On 10-09-12 05:19 PM, Michael Shadle wrote:
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Tamara Temple> wrote:
Ok, but how do you detect if a field changes? The specific
implementation
between application and data storage is probably moot until you
f
At 4:05 PM -0500 9/12/10, Tamara Temple wrote:
Sounds like there are some security concerns here.
On Sep 12, 2010, at 11:32 AM, tedd wrote:
I have a client who wants his employees' access to their online
business database restricted to only times when he is logged on.
(Don't ask why)
I do wo
On 10-09-12 05:19 PM, Michael Shadle wrote:
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Tamara Temple wrote:
Ok, but how do you detect if a field changes? The specific implementation
between application and data storage is probably moot until you figure that
part out.
+1
without talking to the server,
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Tamara Temple wrote:
> Ok, but how do you detect if a field changes? The specific implementation
> between application and data storage is probably moot until you figure that
> part out.
+1
without talking to the server, or accessing it in the DOM somewhere,
the
On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 16:12 -0500, Tamara Temple wrote:
> On Sep 12, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> > On 10-09-11 12:52 PM, Tamara Temple wrote:
> >> I have a general question and am looking for best practices.
> >>
> >> Suppose I present a user with a form for editing an entry in a
On Sep 12, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
On 10-09-11 12:52 PM, Tamara Temple wrote:
I have a general question and am looking for best practices.
Suppose I present a user with a form for editing an entry in a table,
i.e., the form has filled in values from the existing table entry.
Sounds like there are some security concerns here.
On Sep 12, 2010, at 11:32 AM, tedd wrote:
I have a client who wants his employees' access to their online
business database restricted to only times when he is logged on.
(Don't ask why)
I do wonder why, though. Perhaps this is an opportuni
On 10-09-11 12:52 PM, Tamara Temple wrote:
I have a general question and am looking for best practices.
Suppose I present a user with a form for editing an entry in a table,
i.e., the form has filled in values from the existing table entry.
Now, suppose they click on 'submit' without making any
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 1:51 PM, tedd wrote:
> At 1:18 PM -0400 9/12/10, Andy McKenzie wrote:
>>
>> >
>>>
>>> A question, to clarify my fuzzy thinking about such things:
>>>
>>> Can a business have a server connected to the Internet but limit access
>>> to
>>> just their employees? I don't mea
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 11:37 PM, tedd wrote:
> At 1:47 PM -0400 9/12/10, Jason Pruim wrote:
>>>
> So, could a server be set up in an office that would run web-languages such
> that users in the office could access their server and run scripts using
> browsers?
yes, it's just few steps.
1. conne
On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 14:07 -0400, tedd wrote:
> At 1:47 PM -0400 9/12/10, Jason Pruim wrote:
> >>On Sep 12, 2010, at 1:33 PM, tedd wrote:
> >>So, can I do what I do (i.e., programming) without having a host?
> >>Can I install a local server at my clients location and interface
> >>all their com
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 11:03 PM, tedd wrote:
> At 5:57 PM +0100 9/12/10, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>>
>
> I'm sure this is an obvious question for many on this list, but I'm not
> above showing my ignorance.
>
> I guess what I am asking -- if a client wanted an application written (in
> web language
At 1:47 PM -0400 9/12/10, Jason Pruim wrote:
On Sep 12, 2010, at 1:33 PM, tedd wrote:
So, can I do what I do (i.e., programming) without having a host?
Can I install a local server at my clients location and interface
all their computers to use the server without them ever being
connected to t
At 1:18 PM -0400 9/12/10, Andy McKenzie wrote:
>
A question, to clarify my fuzzy thinking about such things:
Can a business have a server connected to the Internet but limit access to
just their employees? I don't mean a password protected scheme, but rather
the server being totally closed
On Sep 12, 2010, at 1:33 PM, tedd wrote:
At 5:57 PM +0100 9/12/10, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 12:55 -0400, tedd wrote:
Can a business have a server connected to the Internet but limit
access to just their employees? I don't mean a password protected
scheme, but rather the s
At 1:40 PM -0400 9/12/10, Joshua Kehn wrote:
On Sep 12, 2010, at 1:33 PM, tedd wrote:
> So, can I do what I do (i.e., programming) without having a host?
Can I install a local server at my clients location and interface
all their computers to use the server without them ever being
connected
On Sep 12, 2010, at 1:33 PM, tedd wrote:
> At 5:57 PM +0100 9/12/10, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>> On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 12:55 -0400, tedd wrote:
>>
>>> Can a business have a server connected to the Internet but limit
>>> access to just their employees? I don't mean a password protected
>>> scheme,
At 5:57 PM +0100 9/12/10, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 12:55 -0400, tedd wrote:
Can a business have a server connected to the Internet but limit
access to just their employees? I don't mean a password protected
scheme, but rather the server being totally closed to the outside
wo
>
> A question, to clarify my fuzzy thinking about such things:
>
> Can a business have a server connected to the Internet but limit access to
> just their employees? I don't mean a password protected scheme, but rather
> the server being totally closed to the outside world other than to their
> in
On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 12:55 -0400, tedd wrote:
> At 4:42 PM -0400 9/10/10, Daniel Brown wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 16:37, Steve Staples wrote:
> >> Ok, here it goes...
> >>
> > > I am building an app, that requires a web interface.
>
> -snip-
>
> > > i want to be able to run it on lik
At 4:42 PM -0400 9/10/10, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 16:37, Steve Staples wrote:
Ok, here it goes...
> I am building an app, that requires a web interface.
-snip-
> i want to be able to run it on like port 8880 or something... just
looking out there fro something...
tedd wrote:
> Hi gang:
>
> I have a client who wants his employees' access to their online
> business database restricted to only times when he is logged on.
> (Don't ask why)
>
> In other words, when the boss is not logged on, then his employees
> cannot access the business database in any fash
On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 12:32 -0400, tedd wrote:
> Hi gang:
>
> I have a client who wants his employees' access to their online
> business database restricted to only times when he is logged on.
> (Don't ask why)
>
> In other words, when the boss is not logged on, then his employees
> cannot ac
Tedd-
Would he consider access to another database? I.e. a separate, say memcached db
which stores the "boss" status?
An issue with the temporary file would also be session length, if the session
expires without the user explicitly logging off, the file wouldn't be removed.
A way to bypass thi
Hi gang:
I have a client who wants his employees' access to their online
business database restricted to only times when he is logged on.
(Don't ask why)
In other words, when the boss is not logged on, then his employees
cannot access the business database in any fashion whatsoever
includin
On 09/12/2010 02:38 AM, Tamara Temple wrote:
>
> On Sep 11, 2010, at 10:46 PM, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>> It could however be a problem if there is a BOT or something that
>> continually submits to your page. In that case (and in general) I would
>> recommend using a form token that helps guard aga
Richard Quadling wrote:
> On 11 September 2010 20:24, Jim Lucas wrote:
>> As I thought, looking through the docs, it looks like the only way to set
>> the options that are only settable via the php.ini file is to use a per
>> directory php.ini file. But, the problem with that is, it only works
>
On 11 September 2010 20:24, Jim Lucas wrote:
> As I thought, looking through the docs, it looks like the only way to set
> the options that are only settable via the php.ini file is to use a per
> directory php.ini file. But, the problem with that is, it only works with
> the CGI/FASTCGI SAPI ver
On Sep 11, 2010, at 9:27 PM, viraj wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Tamara Temple > wrote:
I have a general question and am looking for best practices.
Is it worth the overhead of passing along the previous values in
the table
in hidden fields so that fields can be checked to see if
On Sep 11, 2010, at 10:46 PM, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
It could however be a problem if there is a BOT or something that
continually submits to your page. In that case (and in general) I
would
recommend using a form token that helps guard against this.
I've seen this on some sites, but I'm un
On Sep 11, 2010, at 12:14 PM, Jason Pruim wrote:
On Sep 11, 2010, at 12:39 PM, Tamara Temple wrote:
Rather than repeating all that code, I suggest the following:
[snip]
That's actually what I'm trying to get away from. I was hoping to do
it all in HEREDOC syntax. I've always thought it made
39 matches
Mail list logo
