Re: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

Andrea Giammarchi wrote: if used properly, could avoid recursion, and speed up operations ... there is nothing wrong with goto, everything we write on lowest level is a jump in the memory (as goto is a jump in the code flow) ++goto ... and not goto++ I forgot, I have always used goto in B

RE: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

HEY! Don't try to hijack my astonishingly long-running thread! Start your own Jay. ;-} > -Original Message- > From: Jay Blanchard [mailto:jblanch...@pocket.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 11:34 AM > To: Tommy Pham; php-general@lists.php.net > Subject: RE: [PHP] Whacky increment/as

RE: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

> -Original Message- > From: Paul M Foster [mailto:pa...@quillandmouse.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 6:28 AM > To: php-general@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with > $foo++ vs ++$foo > > On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:51:17AM -0400, Bob McConn

Re: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

At 10:20 AM +1100 10/7/09, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote: On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:08:14 -0400, tedd.sperl...@gmail.com (tedd) wrote: At 10:48 AM -0300 10/6/09, Martin Scotta wrote: No matter how silly it can looks like (a = a++) it is still completely valid code and it SHOULD run without problems.

RE: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

At 1:09 AM +0200 10/7/09, Andrea Giammarchi wrote: > Eddie: And thanks for supporting my point. so you think as well that 3 characters, written like this i++, in a careless way, or like this ++i, make the difference about time spent to develop ... interesting No, just the opposite. It d

Re: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:08:14 -0400, tedd.sperl...@gmail.com (tedd) wrote: >At 10:48 AM -0300 10/6/09, Martin Scotta wrote: >>No matter how silly it can looks like (a = a++) it is still completely valid >>code and it SHOULD run without problems. > >Yeah, it's a valid as: > >$a = $a; > >and does

RE: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

> if used properly, could avoid recursion, and speed up operations ... there is > nothing wrong with goto, everything we write on lowest level is a jump in the > memory (as goto is a jump in the code flow) > > ++goto ... and not goto++ I forgot, I have always used goto in Batch script, which

RE: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

> Speaking of starting a conversation, what do you think about the "goto" > construct introduced just recently? if used properly, could avoid recursion, and speed up operations ... there is nothing wrong with goto, everything we write on lowest level is a jump in the memory (as goto is a jump

RE: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

> Eddie: > > And thanks for supporting my point. so you think as well that 3 characters, written like this i++, in a careless way, or like this ++i, make the difference about time spent to develop ... interesting Regards

RE: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

ah ah ah that's for sure, I've never said that is correct, I said that is illogical ;-) > Subject: RE: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo > Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:46:36 -0500 > From: jblanch...@pocket.com > To: an_...@hotmail.com; tedd.sperl...@gmail.com; php-ge

RE: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

> Furthermore, the amount > of time micro-optimization takes up (going through old code, I mean) > could be better spent doing something that actually does increase your > performance, like implementing a search engine or memcached. Going > forward, if you're aware that ++i and i++ are the same

Re: [Fwd: [PHP] Sessions in databases]

Sam Stelfox wrote on 2009-10-06 18:09: If you are distributing your application over multiple servers, using a database for session tracking allows a user to continue there session regardless of which server their request bounces too. It prevents the need for 'sticky' network connections which

RE: [PHP] Re: ternary operator sintax help

Absolutely. ;) I was reporting to ashley teachings. :-) Philip, thanks for the tip. :-) Thank you all, Márcio > -Original Message- > From: Tom Worster [mailto:f...@thefsb.org] > Sent: terça-feira, 6 de Outubro de 2009 21:10 > To: MEM; php-general@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP] Re:

Re: [PHP] Re: ternary operator sintax help

just as ashley said it. On 10/6/09 3:26 PM, "MEM" wrote: > Sorry all, > It's ok. The sintax: > > class="mensagemErro">'.$erros['anexo'].'' :''); ?> > > Was right all the time. > > Anyway, I've learn something new: having a var with '' is not the same thing > as not been unset. So we must pa

Re: [PHP] Re: ternary operator sintax help

On Oct 6, 2009, at 2:26 PM, MEM wrote: Sorry all, It's ok. The sintax: '.$erros['anexo'].'' :''); ?> Was right all the time. Anyway, I've learn something new: having a var with '' is not the same thing as not been unset. So we must pay attention on what cases we use isset, or !empty. T

RE: [PHP] Re: ternary operator sintax help

Sorry all, It's ok. The sintax: '.$erros['anexo'].'' :''); ?> Was right all the time. Anyway, I've learn something new: having a var with '' is not the same thing as not been unset. So we must pay attention on what cases we use isset, or !empty. Thanks a lot, Márcio > -Original Message-

Re: [PHP] ternary operator sintax help

On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 19:43 +0100, MEM wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm trying to display a div, only when some php value is set. > Since this will be near html, I'd like to keep it on one line. So, I'd love > to use shortcuts and a ternary operator for the effect. > > I'm having something like this

RE: [PHP] ternary operator sintax help

Thanks. I will give up on I mean, it will show the message only when the form gets submitted. At the beginning it will have ‘’. :s Regards, Marcio From: Ashley Sheridan [mailto:a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk] Sent: terça-feira, 6 de Outubro de 2009 19:49 To: MEM Cc: php-general@list

[PHP] Re: JM.PHP.NET

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 14:56, Dan Papakonstantino wrote: > Hello Dan, > > Sorry for the misunderstanding however, we are web developers as well as > hardware and software developers. You may have overlooked our web based > timesheet application called SonicWeb. Please review the following link o

[PHP] Re: ternary operator sintax help

'.$erros['anexo'].'' :''); ?> ""MEM"" escreveu na mensagem news:002401ca46b4$ed6ad6a0$c84083...@com... Hello all, I'm trying to display a div, only when some php value is set. Since this will be near html, I'd like to keep it on one line. So, I'd love to use shortcuts and a ternary operator for

Re: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 14:46, Israel Ekpo wrote: > > Speaking of starting a conversation, what do you think about the "goto" > construct introduced just recently? Better yet: what do you all think of folks hijacking threads? -- daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net http://www.paras

Re: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Jay Blanchard wrote: > [snip] > I find it interesting for a discussion to go on this long for something > as > $a = $a++; > [/snip] > > You think that is interesting? Start a conversation about these > > {} > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) >

RE: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 13:34 -0500, Jay Blanchard wrote: > [snip] > I find it interesting for a discussion to go on this long for something > as > $a = $a++; > [/snip] > > You think that is interesting? Start a conversation about these > > {} > Now they actually make sense! I've used those as

[PHP] ternary operator sintax help

Hello all, I'm trying to display a div, only when some php value is set. Since this will be near html, I'd like to keep it on one line. So, I'd love to use shortcuts and a ternary operator for the effect. I'm having something like this right now, but the div still appears even if the error is NOT

Re: [PHP] Self-Process php forms or not?

On Oct 5, 2009, at 7:42 PM, Manuel Lemos wrote: Hello, on 10/05/2009 03:02 PM Philip Thompson said the following: I try to avoid the use of hidden form elements as much as possible, especially for tracking whether a user has submitted a form or not... I use name="submit" for the submit but

Re: [Fwd: [PHP] Sessions in databases]

On 10/6/09 10:26 AM, "Il pinguino volante" wrote: > I have to realize an authentication system for a lot of users. > > I heard that someone uses to store session states (?) into a database. I'd > like to know how and, expecially, WHY to do it and what's would be better > (considering that I CANN

RE: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

[snip] I find it interesting for a discussion to go on this long for something as $a = $a++; [/snip] You think that is interesting? Start a conversation about these {} -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

At 11:11 AM -0700 10/6/09, Tommy Pham wrote: I find it interesting for a discussion to go on this long for something as $a = $a++; which should have never happened in the first place ;) Regards, Tommy Hey, we're programmers. We waste time for a living. Cheers, tedd -- --- http://sperli

Re: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

- Original Message > From: tedd > To: Martin Scotta ; Paul M Foster > > Cc: php-general@lists.php.net > Sent: Tue, October 6, 2009 11:08:14 AM > Subject: Re: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo > > At 10:48 AM -0300 10/6/09, Martin Scotta wrote: > > No matter

Re: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

At 10:48 AM -0300 10/6/09, Martin Scotta wrote: No matter how silly it can looks like (a = a++) it is still completely valid code and it SHOULD run without problems. Yeah, it's a valid as: $a = $a; and does the same thing, which is nothing. If you want a statement that does something, the

Re: [PHP] Spry, XML, PHP and XSLT Hell

- Original Message > From: Tommy Pham > To: PHP General list > Sent: Tue, October 6, 2009 10:41:42 AM > Subject: Re: [PHP] Spry, XML, PHP and XSLT Hell > > - Original Message > > From: Matthew Croud > > To: PHP General list > > Sent: Tue, October 6, 2009 1:32:18 AM > > Subjec

RE: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

At 12:46 PM -0500 10/6/09, Jay Blanchard wrote: [snip] ...micro optimizations... [/snip] And in the land of micro optimization you would likely never see the following; $a = $a++; I must live in the land of micro optimization. Cheers, tedd -- --- http://sperling.com http://ancientstone

Re: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

The problem with PHP micro-optimizations like that or ' vs. " is that PHP rarely bottlenecks a PHP/MySQL application (actually if you run a dedicated box, see how often your CPU hits 100%, it won't be very often for the vast majority of PHP/MySQL sites which are more likely to be disk i/o bound t

RE: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

[snip] ...micro optimizations... [/snip] And in the land of micro optimization you would likely never see the following; $a = $a++; -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

RE: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

At 6:25 PM +0200 10/6/09, Andrea Giammarchi wrote: er ... tedd, whatever, usually ++i is faster in almost every language, and even C developers could use these kind of micro optimizations. Speed, even in this SuperCPU era, is still relevant, we would not need benchmark to compare programming

Re: [PHP] Spry, XML, PHP and XSLT Hell

- Original Message > From: Matthew Croud > To: PHP General list > Sent: Tue, October 6, 2009 1:32:18 AM > Subject: [PHP] Spry, XML, PHP and XSLT Hell > > > Okey Doke, > > I'll try and be brief, > Well, my client agreed to a small online store that would hold the same stock > items wh

Re: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Andrea Giammarchi wrote: > > er ... tedd, whatever, usually ++i is faster in almost every language, and > even C developers could use these kind of micro optimizations. > > Speed, even in this SuperCPU era, is still relevant, we would not need > benchmark to comp

Re: [PHP] Active Directory LDAP Help

- Original Message > From: Devendra Jadhav > To: Yves Premel-Cabic > Cc: php-general@lists.php.net > Sent: Tue, October 6, 2009 6:18:13 AM > Subject: Re: [PHP] Active Directory LDAP Help > > The existing Infrastructure is ready. and now at this point of time this is > difficult to switc

Re: [PHP] Dynamic array creation and tracking

At 12:18 PM -0400 10/6/09, John Nichel wrote: Howdy guys and girls. Been a long time since I've been in these parts. My php is rusty these days, so please bare with me. I'm trying to create a dynamic, multidimensional array, and keep track of which level I'm on, opening and closing levels as ne

Re: [Fwd: [PHP] Sessions in databases]

If you are distributing your application over multiple servers, using a database for session tracking allows a user to continue there session regardless of which server their request bounces too. It prevents the need for 'sticky' network connections which time out anyways. Databases can make sc

RE: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

er ... tedd, whatever, usually ++i is faster in almost every language, and even C developers could use these kind of micro optimizations. Speed, even in this SuperCPU era, is still relevant, we would not need benchmark to compare programming languages for each purpose. Of course in a crappy ap

Re: [PHP] Time Problem: always ten past xx

At 10:07 AM +0200 10/6/09, Matthias Laug wrote: argh, why do I always stick to the stupid questions :( sorry Because with the important questions, you don't need answers. You understand them. Cheers, tedd -- --- http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com --

[PHP] Dynamic array creation and tracking

Howdy guys and girls. Been a long time since I've been in these parts. My php is rusty these days, so please bare with me. I'm trying to create a dynamic, multidimensional array, and keep track of which level I'm on, opening and closing levels as needed. Lets say that I have some data like the b

RE: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

At 3:56 PM +0200 10/6/09, Andrea Giammarchi wrote: > Does these behaves exactly? for($i=0; $i<10; ++$i) for($i=0; $i<10; $i++) different benchmarks showed ++$i is usually faster than $i++ "Faster" is a relative term that is becoming more meaningless each year. Considering that "speed" is

Re: [PHP] PHPNW09

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:34, David Otton wrote: > Is anyone from the list heading to PHPNW this weekend? Coincidentally, the PHPNW UG meeting is listed for tomorrow, but I have no listing for a conference this weekend. If you're in contact with any of those folks, Dave, you can ask them to

[PHP] Re: Display HTML in XSL Style Sheet

Matthew Croud wrote: Is there a way to store HTML in an XML file, Access that node using XLST, and have it display as rendered html ? As XHTML ypu can integrate it in an XML, by the use of XMLNS. But it is OT. In the XML, you declare two XMLNS. In the XSLT, you declare three XMLNS. -- Mi

Re: [PHP] How do YOU set default function/method params?

Mert Oztekin wrote: > IMO, array_merge() is easy to use, however it suppose to use more cpu than > other options. If you are a performance freak, i suggest you to not choose > array_merge() solution. (also you execute date() and md5() functions even if > you wont need to use them) > > In the ot

Re: [PHP] PHPNW09

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:34, Ashley Sheridan wrote: > > No, it is a little far out for me. Is there something similar in > Londinium? Best way to keep informed is through php.net. Don't make our efforts be in vain! ;-P -- daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net http://www.parasane

Re: [PHP] PHPNW09

2009/10/6 Ashley Sheridan > No, it is a little far out for me. Is there something similar in Londinium? Dozens, probably. Try the PHPLondon guys, and the PHP UK Conference for a start: http://www.phplondon.org/wiki/Main_Page http://www.phpconference.co.uk/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http:/

Re: [PHP] PHPNW09

On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 16:34 +0100, David Otton wrote: > Is anyone from the list heading to PHPNW this weekend? > > Saturday: > > Keynote: The Uncertainty Principle > > Passing The Joel Test in the PHP world > SPL, not a bridge too far > Tools and Talent > The beauty and the beast – API document

[PHP] PHPNW09

Is anyone from the list heading to PHPNW this weekend? Saturday: Keynote: The Uncertainty Principle Passing The Joel Test in the PHP world SPL, not a bridge too far Tools and Talent The beauty and the beast – API documentation with phpDocumentor Getting a website out of the door Optimizing Your

[PHP] Sessions in databases

Hi to all. I have to realize an authentication system for a lot of users. I heard that someone uses to store session states (?) to a database. I'd like to know how by expecially WHY doing that and what's would be better (considering that I can -d'oh!- touch the php.ini file). Thanks in adva

Re: [PHP] Display HTML in XSL Style Sheet

On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 15:10 +0100, Matthew Croud wrote: > Hi, > Is there a way to store HTML in an XML file, > Access that node using XLST, and have it display as rendered html ? > > So far my attempts either return the text equivalent of the html, with > nothing rendered. > > Cheers, > Matt.

[Fwd: [PHP] Sessions in databases]

(There were some erroros in the previous email, I'm sorry) Hi to all. I have to realize an authentication system for a lot of users. I heard that someone uses to store session states (?) into a database. I'd like to know how and, expecially, WHY to do it and what's would be better (considerin

[PHP] Display HTML in XSL Style Sheet

Hi, Is there a way to store HTML in an XML file, Access that node using XLST, and have it display as rendered html ? So far my attempts either return the text equivalent of the html, with nothing rendered. Cheers, Matt. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe,

Re: [PHP] Time Problem: always ten past xx

On 10/6/09 4:16 AM, "Mert Oztekin" wrote: > My mistake, > > I thought it was date() now strftime() > Sorry > > (why do php developers create two different standarts for such similiar > functions???☺ ) > it's traditional to do so. it reminds me of the bit about subtly incompatible shells in un

RE: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

> Does these behaves exactly? > for($i=0; $i<10; ++$i) > for($i=0; $i<10; $i++) different benchmarks showed ++$i is usually faster than $i++ In that loop case, yes, what's happen internally is exactly the same, $i will be from 0 to 9, in the other case obviously is not the same. but pre increm

Re: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Paul M Foster wrote: > On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:51:17AM -0400, Bob McConnell wrote: > > > From: Joost [mailto:joost.t.h...@planet.nl] > > > "Daevid Vincent" wrote: > > >>> From: Ben Dunlap [mailto:bdun...@agentintellect.com] > > > > > $a = $a++; > > > > I jus

Re: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:51:17AM -0400, Bob McConnell wrote: > From: Joost [mailto:joost.t.h...@planet.nl] > > "Daevid Vincent" wrote: > >>> From: Ben Dunlap [mailto:bdun...@agentintellect.com] > > > $a = $a++; > > I just think this is an ambiguous line of code that wasn't thought > throu

Re: [PHP] Active Directory LDAP Help

The existing Infrastructure is ready. and now at this point of time this is difficult to switch to the Linux based. I love linux but helpless now ... There is not so much information available on php.net On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Yves Premel-Cabic wrote: > Why don't you use linux solutions

RE: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

> It will be an accident > if you get the results you are expecting. I agree that the operation is illogical, I must disagree about accidents. In PHP that operation will mean assign to the new $a variable the value returned from the other $a variable before the increment. There is no mystery

RE: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

From: Joost [mailto:joost.t.h...@planet.nl] > "Daevid Vincent" wrote: >>> From: Ben Dunlap [mailto:bdun...@agentintellect.com] > $a = $a++; I just think this is an ambiguous line of code that wasn't thought through. The presence of the postfix operator makes the result undefined, no matter

Re: [PHP] Active Directory LDAP Help

Why don't you use linux solutions like RedHat Directory Server or Mandriva Directory Server instead? (LDAP based too) These solutions are scalable, free & fully documented on the web, not like this shitty MS AD (but is there a non-shitty MS product :p) This is also much more easier to debugg...

[PHP] Active Directory LDAP Help

Hi All, I am new to LDAP. I want to create user on AD(Active Directory) I have written script to do same, but I am getting "Operations error" even I am successfully connected to AD and bounded with correct username, password. Also where will I get all attributes with its meanign... which attribute

[PHP] Re: How do YOU set default function/method params?

Jim Lucas wrote: Here is a problem that I have had for years now. I have been trying to come up with the perfect solution for this problem. But, I have come down to two different methods for solving it. Here is the problem... date('c'), 'Message-ID' => md5($to.$subject), ); $headers +

[PHP] Spry, XML, PHP and XSLT Hell

Okey Doke, I'll try and be brief, Well, my client agreed to a small online store that would hold the same stock items where only the quantities would differ, we agreed that, due to infrequent changes, I would make pages for any new items, and she would control stock etc using an e-shopping

RE: [PHP] Time Problem: always ten past xx

Hi Mert, But we're not talking about date() here, we're talking strftime(). According to the manual %i doesn't do anything in strftime(). Closest match is %I which is 12-hour format for hours. HTH J -Original Message- From: Mert Oztekin [mailto:mozte...@anadolusigorta.com.tr] Sent: 06

RE: [PHP] A really wacky design decision

> but is implicitly converted into strings when it is entered. use floatVal($str1) === floatVal($str2) then ... I honestly cannot spot any problem in what you wanna do, I can just spot an error in the root of the process: threat strings as numbers, comparing potatoes and tomatoes ... there a

RE: [PHP] Time Problem: always ten past xx

My mistake, I thought it was date() now strftime() Sorry (why do php developers create two different standarts for such similiar functions???☺ ) _ From: Mert Oztekin Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 11:07 AM To: 'Jason'; 'Matthias Laug'; php-general@li

[PHP] Re: Time Problem: always ten past xx

Matthias Laug schrieb: > var_dump(strftime("%d.%m.%Y %H:%m",$time)); ---^ > The minutes are always "10", no matter what time I get. "%m" = month "%M" = minute Regards, Carsten -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php

RE: [PHP] Time Problem: always ten past xx

Jason, %M is also month: Month --- --- F A full textual representation of a month, such as January or March January through December m Numeric representation of a month, with leading zeros 01 through 12 M A short textual representation of a month, three letters Jan through Dec n Numeric represen

Re: [PHP] Time Problem: always ten past xx

argh, why do I always stick to the stupid questions :( sorry Am 06.10.2009 um 10:03 schrieb Mert Oztekin: You also write the answer var_dump(strftime("%d.%m.%Y %H:%m",$time)); there are 2 %m you see? %m is month :) for minute use %i -Original Message- From: Matthias Laug [mailto:m

RE: [PHP] Time Problem: always ten past xx

You also write the answer var_dump(strftime("%d.%m.%Y %H:%m",$time)); there are 2 %m you see? %m is month :) for minute use %i -Original Message- From: Matthias Laug [mailto:matthias.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 10:53 AM To: php-general@lists.php.net Subject: [PHP]

RE: [PHP] Time Problem: always ten past xx

Hi, That's because %m is month, what you need is %M for minute (note uppercase). Check out http://php.net/strftime HTH J -Original Message- From: Matthias Laug [mailto:matthias.l...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 October 2009 08:53 To: php-general@lists.php.net Subject: [PHP] Time Problem: alway

[PHP] Time Problem: always ten past xx

Hey everybody, I've got a strange problem. Using PHP5.3 on my MacBook. There is a script, which handles input from user, in this case a date and time. So I get for example "10:30" and "06.10.2009". Standard german time format. Now I try to get the correct timestamp: $time = strtotime("06

Re: [PHP] Spry, XML, PHP and XSLT Hell

- Original Message > From: Andrew Mason > To: Nathan Nobbe > Cc: Matthew Croud ; PHP General list > > Sent: Mon, October 5, 2009 8:56:12 PM > Subject: Re: [PHP] Spry, XML, PHP and XSLT Hell > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:37 AM, Nathan Nobbe wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Ma

Re: [PHP] How do YOU set default function/method params?

paragasu wrote: why bother, i use available good library http://swiftmailer.org/ Ok, bad example. I already use SwiftMailer. My "problem" though has nothing to do with sending an email. I should have known someone would take it too literally. Think a little more general. This is not a s