On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 2:43 AM, Paul Scott wrote:
> Eddie Drapkin wrote:
>> if you want a pure opcode cache, APC is a great choice.
>>
>>> you think this is similar to http://www.danga.com/memcached/ or you think
>>> this method would be faster ? Which do you say would be the greatest
>>> benfit ?
ok thanks for information was just something I was reading about the
other night. Then I came across this message.
Brandon
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Eddie Drapkin wrote:
> if you want a pure opcode cache, APC is a great choice.
>
>> you think this is similar to http://www.danga.com/memcached/ or you think
>> this method would be faster ? Which do you say would be the greatest
>> benfit ?
>>
A simple rule of thumb that I use is:
If you have on
if you want a pure opcode cache, APC is a great choice.
APC should //not// be used for persistent RAM storage. Memcached is
much faster and designed for that aim, while not being tied to the
webserver.
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Brandon Johnson wrote:
> you think this is similar to http://w
you think this is similar to http://www.danga.com/memcached/ or you think
this method would be faster ? Which do you say would be the greatest
benfit ?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
2009/7/4 PJ :
> Stuart wrote:
>> 2009/7/4 PJ :
>>
>>> Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>>>
On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 10:47 -0400, PJ wrote:
> Jim Lucas wrote:
>
>
>> PJ wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Could somebody please explain to me what is wrong with this code?
>>> In my scri
Stuart wrote:
> 2009/7/4 PJ :
>
>> Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 10:47 -0400, PJ wrote:
>>>
>>>
Jim Lucas wrote:
> PJ wrote:
>
>
>> Could somebody please explain to me what is wrong with this code?
>> In my
Stuart wrote:
> 2009/7/4 PJ :
>
>> Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 10:47 -0400, PJ wrote:
>>>
>>>
Jim Lucas wrote:
> PJ wrote:
>
>
>> Could somebody please explain to me what is wrong with this code?
>> In my
2009/7/4 PJ :
> Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>> On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 10:47 -0400, PJ wrote:
>>
>>> Jim Lucas wrote:
>>>
PJ wrote:
> Could somebody please explain to me what is wrong with this code?
> In my script it works, returns the correct id, but when I try it in a
> test pages
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 10:47 -0400, PJ wrote:
>
>> Jim Lucas wrote:
>>
>>> PJ wrote:
>>>
Could somebody please explain to me what is wrong with this code?
In my script it works, returns the correct id, but when I try it in a
test pages, nothing
On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 10:47 -0400, PJ wrote:
> Jim Lucas wrote:
> > PJ wrote:
> >> Could somebody please explain to me what is wrong with this code?
> >> In my script it works, returns the correct id, but when I try it in a
> >> test pages, nothing in the world gets it to work. This is rather
> >>
I'd never bothered to use an opcode cache before.
Sure, I had used accelerators that cached includes and stuff in ram, but
damn - APC has made my site (at least on dev machine) snappy.
It wasn't too bad before, but I make heavy use of the database.
This is necessary for me to make maintenance
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 15:47, Eddie Drapkin wrote:
> I bought one, these are AWESOME.
General policy on the list is not to respond to these, even as a
joke. It just confirms to the jackasses who send this crap that the
message was read by someone.
--
daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@p
Jim Lucas wrote:
> PJ wrote:
>> Could somebody please explain to me what is wrong with this code?
>> In my script it works, returns the correct id, but when I try it in a
>> test pages, nothing in the world gets it to work. This is rather
>> frustrating, again:
>> THIS WORKS IN ANOTHER PAGE; IN THE
Jason Carson wrote:
Yes, I am trying to write stuff to a file with PHP but in between the
tags and without deleting what is already in the file.
The only way is to read the file into memory, manipulate it there, and
then rewrite it.
Use a regex to get rid of the last closing tag, append
15 matches
Mail list logo
