On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 15:12, Ian wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Appologies if this is the wrong list - please direct me in the right
> > direction should this be the case.
> >
> > I am running PHP 5.2.8 on freebsd 7.0 and am getting a Seg fau
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:49:34PM -0500, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 22:46, Paul M Foster wrote:
> >
> > Incidentally, I'm relatively new to the list, but I see a lot of CCs
> > along with posts to the list. The CCs are only useful if non-subscribers
> > can post to the list. I
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:57:34AM +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>
> welcome; good to see a new face - even if it is preformatted courier as
> per :p
That "preformatted courier" sounds like your email client. I use mutt an
vim for mail.
Paul
--
Paul M. Foster
--
PHP General Mailing List (ht
Kyle Terry wrote:
I demand Dan and Nathan to go to bed now.
yeah it's 4am; day job in 5 hours - kinda waiting on the mrs tonight;
she just released another mix onto the net and the process is long and
slow while she gets everything just so - damn good though - but always
seems to do it at ni
Kyle Terry wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Eric Butera wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Bastien Koert wrote:
I'm in, sounds like fun and a great way to learn new stuff
This is what I was thinking too. I'm just not sure what sort of
contributions I could make to such a thing.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Paul M Foster wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:29:29AM +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>>
>> Paul M Foster wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:57:25PM +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>>
>>
>> You really don't have enough to
Paul M Foster wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:29:29AM +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Paul M Foster wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:57:25PM +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
You really don't have enough to do, do you?
Paul
actually, way too much - but I like to learn, contribute, think abou
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Paul M Foster wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:29:29AM +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>
> > Paul M Foster wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:57:25PM +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> >>
>
>
>
> >>
> >> You really don't have enough to do, do you?
> >>
> >> Paul
> >
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 22:46, Paul M Foster wrote:
>
> Incidentally, I'm relatively new to the list, but I see a lot of CCs
> along with posts to the list. The CCs are only useful if non-subscribers
> can post to the list. Is that the case?
Yes, sir. It's also part of the rules and guidelin
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Paul M Foster wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:29:29AM +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>
>> Paul M Foster wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:57:25PM +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>>>
>
>
>
>>>
>>> You really don't have enough to do, do you?
>>>
>>> Paul
>>>
>>
>>
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:29:29AM +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Paul M Foster wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:57:25PM +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>>
>>
>> You really don't have enough to do, do you?
>>
>> Paul
>>
>
> actually, way too much - but I like to learn, contribute, think about
>
Paul M Foster wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:57:25PM +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Project: PHP Common Objects and Datatypes
method: for everybody who wishes to contribute, and for everybody to
review, discuss and work on the same classes.
what are they: classes we can all use, that have bee
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:57:25PM +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Project: PHP Common Objects and Datatypes
>
> method: for everybody who wishes to contribute, and for everybody to
> review, discuss and work on the same classes.
>
> what are they: classes we can all use, that have been discussed,
>
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Eric Butera wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Bastien Koert wrote:
> > I'm in, sounds like fun and a great way to learn new stuff
>
> This is what I was thinking too. I'm just not sure what sort of
> contributions I could make to such a thing. It'd be a
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 21:31, Nathan Rixham wrote:
dan - great offer, I'd like to take you up on it [could we install any extra
needed software, such as a wiki / list or something that allows discussion
and document storage made website available]
svn - a must imho
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 21:31, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> >
> > dan - great offer, I'd like to take you up on it [could we install any
> extra
> > needed software, such as a wiki / list or something that allows
> discussion
> > and document stor
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Bastien Koert wrote:
> I'm in, sounds like fun and a great way to learn new stuff
This is what I was thinking too. I'm just not sure what sort of
contributions I could make to such a thing. It'd be an interesting
experience to try though.
--
PHP General Mailin
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:23:49PM -, c...@l-i-e.com wrote:
>
> ESTJ
>
Me too.
Paul
--
Paul M. Foster
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 21:31, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>
> dan - great offer, I'd like to take you up on it [could we install any extra
> needed software, such as a wiki / list or something that allows discussion
> and document storage made website available]
> svn - a must imho
Nothing against
Kyle Terry wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
discuss [ wiki needed? ]
wiki will definitely be needed.
dan? :-)
+ a name, cos if we need to start prefixing.. and it can't be 4LC as can't
start with a number :p
The world's object?
"Pobject" [i jest]
really
Bastien Koert wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:58, Edmund Hertle
wrote:
Well, I think we should not go to fast... maybe we are setting up SVN,
webspace, domain, mailing-list and in the end this is only used by 4-5
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Eric Butera wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Kyle Terry wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:58, Edmund Hertle
wrote:
> Well, I think we should no
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Daniel Brown wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:58, Edmund Hertle
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Well, I think we should not go to fast... maybe we are setting up SVN,
>>> webspace, domain, mailing-list and in the end this is only used by 4-5
>>>
Ross McKay wrote:
> One restriction I know (knew?) of is that you can't run DOS programs
> under Wine on 64-bit, but then... why?
I could be wrong, but I'll bet anything that Wine made use of the now
defunct vm86 component of the x86 architecture. That allowed the CPU to
implement a "virtual mac
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:58, Edmund Hertle
wrote:
Well, I think we should not go to fast... maybe we are setting up SVN,
webspace, domain, mailing-list and in the end this is only used by 4-5
people. Because than this can be discussed on this mailinglist. But if there
a
Eric Butera wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Kyle Terry wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:58, Edmund Hertle
wrote:
Well, I think we should not go to fast... maybe we are setting up SVN,
webspace, domain, mailing-list and in the en
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Kyle Terry wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:58, Edmund Hertle
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Well, I think we should not go to fast... maybe we are setting up SVN,
>> > webspace, domain, mailing-list and in the en
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 20:12, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> >
> > lol and sourceforge [doh]; that way if anything takes off natural user
> base
> > and integrated promotion "most active" - possibly with aid of tony :D
>
> There's also Google C
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 20:12, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>
> lol and sourceforge [doh]; that way if anything takes off natural user base
> and integrated promotion "most active" - possibly with aid of tony :D
There's also Google Code, or - if you guys want to be
less-restricted - you can use my 4L
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:58, Edmund Hertle
> wrote:
> >
> > Well, I think we should not go to fast... maybe we are setting up SVN,
> > webspace, domain, mailing-list and in the end this is only used by 4-5
> > people. Because than this can
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:58, Edmund Hertle
wrote:
>
> Well, I think we should not go to fast... maybe we are setting up SVN,
> webspace, domain, mailing-list and in the end this is only used by 4-5
> people. Because than this can be discussed on this mailinglist. But if there
> are quite enough
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Eric Butera wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>>>
>>> Kyle Terry wrote:
>>>
>>> and on the other side.. to open things up
>>>
>>> interface Object {
>>> }
>>>
>>> or
>>>
>>> abstract class Object {
>>> }
>>>
Eric Butera wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Kyle Terry wrote:
and on the other side.. to open things up
interface Object {
}
or
abstract class Object {
}
or
class Object {
}
nothing else for now:
reason:
to address the current and forseable lack of function(
Kyle Terry wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Eric Butera wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
and on the other side.. to open things up
interface Object {
}
or
abstract class Object {
}
or
class Object {
}
nothing else for now:
reason:
to address the curr
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Eric Butera wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> > Kyle Terry wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Nathan Rixham
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Eric Butera wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Kyle Terry
> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Kyle Terry wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>>>
>>> Eric Butera wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Kyle Terry wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Edmund Hertle <
> edmund.
Kyle Terry wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Eric Butera wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Kyle Terry wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Edmund Hertle <
edmund.her...@student.kit.edu> wrote:
2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham
sounds like a starting point. and th
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Eric Butera wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Kyle Terry wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Edmund Hertle <
>>> edmund.her...@student.kit.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham
> s
Eric Butera wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Kyle Terry wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Edmund Hertle <
edmund.her...@student.kit.edu> wrote:
2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham
sounds like a starting point. and the starting point imho, interfaces and
abstracts, then impl
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Kyle Terry wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Edmund Hertle <
> edmund.her...@student.kit.edu> wrote:
>
>> 2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham
>>
>>> sounds like a starting point. and the starting point imho, interfaces and
>>> abstracts, then implementations.
>>>
>>>
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Edmund Hertle <
edmund.her...@student.kit.edu> wrote:
> 2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham
>
>> sounds like a starting point. and the starting point imho, interfaces and
>> abstracts, then implementations.
>>
>> [can't wait for a discussion on the implementation of "Email" l
2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham
>
> sounds like a starting point. and the starting point imho, interfaces and
> abstracts, then implementations.
>
> [can't wait for a discussion on the implementation of "Email" lmfao]
>
> can i gather that this is a postive response and a few interested parties?
>
> if so
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:38, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Daniel Brown wrote:
>>
>>A good place to start is by showing how this would benefit from
>> things like PEAR and PECL.
>
> care to contrib that info / thoughts dan? :-) good idea.
No, I'm just typing and multitasking with too many thin
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 18:33, Kyle Terry wrote:
>
> "Hey Mr. Bossman, I'm a software veloper. Here is my resume."
Well, if we're dropping the de- as a prefix, and dis- and de- are
veritably synonymous, and the opposite of dis- is en-, you may as well
start calling yourself an enveloper.
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 18:32 -0600, Micah Gersten wrote:
> Ross McKay wrote:
> > You'll also use a little more RAM due to pointer and integer sizes.
> > However, Linux will be able to address more RAM on a >3GB system.
> >
> Linux can already address all the RAM on a 32 bit system with PAE. The
Edmund Hertle wrote:
2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham
sounds good; (discussion begins) - but if we're all going to use them in
production maybe we'd need to use say php 5.1.6 or the most common accross
all os's and servers..? how many servers will have php 5.3 support from the
off (think redhat servers!
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Daniel Brown wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:28, Daniel Brown wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe you could call it PEAR. ;-P
>>>
>>
>>(Sent too quickly. Meant to include this, too:)
>>
>>A good place to start is by showing how this woul
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:28, Daniel Brown wrote:
Maybe you could call it PEAR. ;-P
(Sent too quickly. Meant to include this, too:)
A good place to start is by showing how this would benefit from
things like PEAR and PECL.
care to contrib that info / thou
2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham
>
> sounds good; (discussion begins) - but if we're all going to use them in
> production maybe we'd need to use say php 5.1.6 or the most common accross
> all os's and servers..? how many servers will have php 5.3 support from the
> off (think redhat servers!)
Well, what
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:28, Daniel Brown wrote:
>
>Maybe you could call it PEAR. ;-P
(Sent too quickly. Meant to include this, too:)
A good place to start is by showing how this would benefit from
things like PEAR and PECL. Also note that phpclasses.org isn't an
official or end
Ross McKay wrote:
> You'll also use a little more RAM due to pointer and integer sizes.
> However, Linux will be able to address more RAM on a >3GB system.
>
Linux can already address all the RAM on a 32 bit system with PAE. The
advantage of 64 bit with regards to RAM is that a single process c
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 18:57, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> [snip!]
> >
> > the idea wouldn't be a framework or another php classes, more of a repo
> full
> > of common classes to save us all some time
> [snip!]
>
>Maybe you could call it
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 18:57, Nathan Rixham wrote:
[snip!]
>
> the idea wouldn't be a framework or another php classes, more of a repo full
> of common classes to save us all some time
[snip!]
Maybe you could call it PEAR. ;-P
--
daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net
http://w
Kyle Terry wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Edmund Hertle <
edmund.her...@student.kit.edu> wrote:
2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham
Project: PHP Common Objects and Datatypes
method: for everybody who wishes to contribute, and for everybody to
review, discuss and work on the same classes.
what
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Edmund Hertle <
edmund.her...@student.kit.edu> wrote:
> 2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham
>
> > Project: PHP Common Objects and Datatypes
> >
> > method: for everybody who wishes to contribute, and for everybody to
> > review, discuss and work on the same classes.
> >
> > w
2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham
> Project: PHP Common Objects and Datatypes
>
> method: for everybody who wishes to contribute, and for everybody to
> review, discuss and work on the same classes.
>
> what are they: classes we can all use, that have been discussed, reviewed
> and agreed between many grea
Project: PHP Common Objects and Datatypes
method: for everybody who wishes to contribute, and for everybody to
review, discuss and work on the same classes.
what are they: classes we can all use, that have been discussed,
reviewed and agreed between many great developers around the world.
t
2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham
>
> a merge is something you do manually, most of the time you just commit
> (overwrite) and svn will log the lines of code that changed - sometimes when
> multiple people work on the site you get a conflict, both changed the same
> lines - this is when you need to manually
Edmund Hertle wrote:
2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham
you don't have to locally develop, you can develop however you want :) svn
is just version controlling all your files to make it easier to team work
and to rollback code. you then tag good versions of the code in svn so you
have a permanent easy to a
Edmund Hertle wrote:
2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham
you don't have to locally develop, you can develop however you want :) svn
is just version controlling all your files to make it easier to team work
and to rollback code. you then tag good versions of the code in svn so you
have a permanent easy to a
You most likely need to configure Apache to process PHP script files. Check
out this page:
http://www.ampsoft.net/webdesign-l/how-to-install-apache-php-mysql-3.html
-TG
- Original Message -
From: lucson pierre-charles
To:
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:37:25 +
Subject: [PHP] Installat
lucson pierre-charles wrote:
I am having problems installing the zip package (PHP5) on Windows Vista. The
output will not come on the browser upon testing. Only the code is being output
to the browser. Apache (Apache 2) was properly installed. Your assistance
please. Regards, Lucson
If you'r
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Kyle Terry wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>>
>> Ross McKay wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:28:05 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham
>
> you don't have to locally develop, you can develop however you want :) svn
> is just version controlling all your files to make it easier to team work
> and to rollback code. you then tag good versions of the code in svn so you
> have a permanent easy to access good ver
Kyle Terry wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Ross McKay wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:28:05 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
[...]
Yes.
well
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Ross McKay wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:28:05 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>>
>> well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
>>>
>>> anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
>>> [...]
>>>
>>
>> Yes
Ross McKay wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:28:05 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
[...]
Yes.
well.. so its common to developers in uk, usa, canada, australia,
everywhere rea
dbrooke wrote:
Hello,
I am interested in hearing opinions about if there
are reasons to stay with a 32bit php/apache if there
is 64bit options available. What are the pros/cons
in running in the different architectures?
(Fat Binary apache2, *nix platform)
Thanks,
Donovan
just to add in; I us
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:28:05 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
>
>anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
>[...]
Yes.
--
Ross McKay, Toronto, NSW Australia
"Towers get higher, Jobs get cheaper,
Highways get wider, Lov
c...@l-i-e.com wrote:
Apparently, it's time for me to take on a project manager job and quit
coding...
Oddly enough, I've been thinking I might like to do that, though more
of an architect/manager role, really...
didn't you already make that change when you became ceo of an
intergalactic enter
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:56:36 -0600, dbrooke wrote:
>I am interested in hearing opinions about if there
>are reasons to stay with a 32bit php/apache if there
>is 64bit options available. What are the pros/cons
>in running in the different architectures?
If you need to run some 32-bit stuff, you'll
>> Apparently, it's time for me to take on a project manager job and quit
>> coding...
>>
>> Oddly enough, I've been thinking I might like to do that, though more
>> of an architect/manager role, really...
>>
>
>didn't you already make that change when you became ceo of an
> intergalactic
sorry i commented in all the wrong places :|
Edmund Hertle wrote:
By locally created and tested scripts you will of course not have those
probs because you're not comitting everything. But locally developing brings
some kind of care-taking like making sure you use everywhere the same
version (ph
lucson pierre-charles wrote:
I am having problems installing the zip package (PHP5) on Windows Vista. The
output will not come on the browser upon testing. Only the code is being output
to the browser. Apache (Apache 2) was properly installed. Your assistance
please. Regards, Lucson
check th
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 17:08, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>
> Somebody used to post a weekly summary that tallied our brownie points. ;-)
I'm working on it! ;-P
--
daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net
http://www.parasane.net/ || http://www.pilotpig.net/
Unadvertised dedicated server d
Edmund Hertle wrote:
2009/1/19 Nathan Rixham
well the idea of svn is that should you find a problem you either rollback
the file(s) to the good version (not rollback the whole site) or you commit
updated files with the fix, then redeploy. No need to branch or such like.
Well, yes, of course t
ESTJ
Apparently, it's time for me to take on a project manager job and quit coding...
Oddly enough, I've been thinking I might like to do that, though more of an
architect/manager role, really...
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.ne
I am having problems installing the zip package (PHP5) on Windows Vista. The
output will not come on the browser upon testing. Only the code is being output
to the browser. Apache (Apache 2) was properly installed. Your assistance
please. Regards, Lucson
2009/1/19 Nathan Rixham
>
> well the idea of svn is that should you find a problem you either rollback
> the file(s) to the good version (not rollback the whole site) or you commit
> updated files with the fix, then redeploy. No need to branch or such like.
>
Well, yes, of course there also will b
c...@l-i-e.com wrote:
ESTJ
Apparently, it's time for me to take on a project manager job and quit coding...
Oddly enough, I've been thinking I might like to do that, though more of an
architect/manager role, really...
didn't you already make that change when you became ceo of an
intergala
Bastien Koert wrote:
always, flex & php at the moment
ahh great to read, flex is amazing, the best product to hit the
developers market in years IMHO, coupled with XMPP (say openfire) it's
great as well - there's something about flex and xmpp.. say if you were
to implement a kind of http ove
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:53 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> >> well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
> >>
> >> anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
> >>
> >> - frequent
Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 12:25 -0500, Daniel Brown wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:33, wrote:
>>> I have been looking but can't find which PHP list is best to post info
>>> regarding a new PHP tool. I have seen new product/service announcements on
>>> this list, but tho
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:53 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
anybody else find the following true when you're a develope
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
>
> anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
>
> - frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
of course
>
> - vast amount of inhuman f
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:53 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
anybody else find the following true when you're a develope
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:53 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> >> well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
> >>
> >> anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
> >>
> >> - frequent
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:46 +, Luke Slater wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> >> well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
> >>
> >> anybody else find the following true when you're a developer
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
- frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
- vast amount of inhuman f
2009/1/19 Ashley Sheridan
> On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> > well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
> >
> > anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
> >
> > - frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
> ye
I'm not alone then (didn't think so :p)
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
- frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more intere
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
- frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
- v
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Afan Pasalic wrote:
>
> Nathan Rixham wrote:
>
>> well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
>>
>> anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
>>
>> - frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
>> - vast amo
Edmund Hertle wrote:
Hey,
I'm thinking about implementing Subversion to an existing php project for
obvious reasons.
But I have some trouble when thinking about the usage.
there are lots of ways of using svn and I'm sure you'll get different
opinions.. personally I always create a script to d
2009/1/19 R B
> I like this apache solution, but if i put
>
> SetEnvIf Referer "^http://www.yourdomain.com"; local_referal
>
> Then i can access the file putting this path in the URL:
>
> http://www.yourdomain.com/xyz/scriptfile.php
> And i don´t want the script to be access by the url. That is
Nathan Rixham wrote:
well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
- frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
- vast amount of inhuman focus, followed by inability to remain focussed
- general t
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Kyle Terry wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
- frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
- vast
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
>
> anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
>
> - frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
yes, but it tends to be side-tracking to w
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
>
> anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
>
> - frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
> - vast amount of inhuman focus, followed
Sergio Jovani wrote:
Thanks to all. The problem is caused by a server restriction.
SourceForge.net does not allow to send emails from PHP.
Bye!
2009/1/17 Morris :
If you are using apache + php, check php.in your server is able to support
the mail() function and you have correctly set up the
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
