On Wednesday 23 April 2008 21:29:40 tedd wrote:
> At 5:24 PM +0300 4/22/08, Sancar Saran wrote:
> >Hello there,
> >
> >Is anyone looking jQuery recently ?. Thas what I call framework...
>
> Yes, and I'm programming with it.
>
> But, that's what jQuery and I call a library.
>
> Cheers,
>
Name it wh
i'm confident, there just isn't much use to the barrage of snippets
and customized stuff.
i am in the middle of some useful, generic code, we're using it where
i work, but it isn't in any sort of distributable fashion at the
moment. it almost mirrors the idea of the zend framework, but in a
proced
>
> Some day I'll pac
> Sadly I have nothing worthwhile out in public right now.
everything is relative in this small world. honestly, just like you,
i also tend to think my code is good (of course because i wrote it)..
personal opinion is different than what the public might say.
some day, when
Some day I'll package up some stuff and release it.
Sadly I have nothing worthwhile out in public right now.
On 4/23/08, paragasu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes: mine.
>
> kind enough to let me see your code .. =)
>
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: ht
> Yes: mine.
kind enough to let me see your code .. =)
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 19:07 -0700, revDAVE wrote:
> NEWBIE! I have some GET data coming from a previous search form.
>
> How do I add the WHERE part ?
>
> orig:
>
> $query_get1 = "SELECT p_First, p_id, p_Last, p_Lvl, p_Sel
> FROM contacts";
>
> --W / WHERE...???
>
> $query_get1 = "SELECT
NEWBIE! I have some GET data coming from a previous search form.
How do I add the WHERE part ?
orig:
$query_get1 = "SELECT p_First, p_id, p_Last, p_Lvl, p_Sel
FROM contacts";
--W / WHERE...???
$query_get1 = "SELECT p_First, p_id, p_Last, p_Lvl, p_Sel
FROM contacts
WHERE p_First like $_GET[
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 20:32 -0500, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 16:50 -0500, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> >
> >> Robert Cummings wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 19:05 -0500, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> >>>
> Tony Marston wrote:
> >>
Ken Kixmoeller.com wrote:
On Apr 23, 2008, at 4:53 PM, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Ken Kixmoeller wrote:
I know how to test for the existance of HTTPS, and stuff like that.
So: Can one test https on a local machine? Resources, anyone? I have
Googled my fingers off.
Why not just generate a free
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 16:50 -0500, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 19:05 -0500, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Tony Marston wrote:
""Jay Blanchard"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 16:50 -0500, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 19:05 -0500, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> >> Tony Marston wrote:
> >>> ""Jay Blanchard"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> [snip]
> > You haven't answer
On Apr 23, 2008, at 4:53 PM, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Ken Kixmoeller wrote:
I know how to test for the existance of HTTPS, and stuff like that.
So: Can one test https on a local machine? Resources, anyone? I
have Googled my fingers off.
Why not just generate a free self-signed certificate fo
just use a self-signed cert.
there should be a lot of examples out there for that.
On 4/23/08, Ken Kixmoeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi - - - - --
>
> I have a typical setup -- my development machine, a testing server and, of
> course, the production server. My development machine, of
Ken Kixmoeller wrote:
Hi - - - - --
I have a typical setup -- my development machine, a testing server and,
of course, the production server. My development machine, of course,
doesn't have a Secure certificate, yet I need to be able to test https
pages here, before getting to the testi
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 19:05 -0500, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Tony Marston wrote:
""Jay Blanchard"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
You haven't answered the question. Where can this piece of wizardry be
downloaded so that it can be reviewed
Hi - - - - --
I have a typical setup -- my development machine, a testing server
and, of course, the production server. My development machine, of
course, doesn't have a Secure certificate, yet I need to be able to
test https pages here, before getting to the testing server.
(Curren
In that case you may want to try XMLReader as it doesn't load all XML
into memory.
If that doesn't help that you will need to do custom parser
application for you need.
using XMLReader to read through whole XML chunking it with eg every
5000 items and storing those chunks on disk.
Than us
Hi,
How about expat with custom XML handlers? Should work even with an 32 MB
memory limit. It will just take some time ...
Have fun
Bastien Koert schrieb:
On 4/23/08, Steve Gula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I work for a company that has chosen to use XML (Software AG Tamino XML
database) as i
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 16:54 -0400, Wolf wrote:
> Thiago Pojda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks everyone for replying, I think those names can change someone's mind
> > ;)
> >
> > -Mensagem original-
> > De: mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Enviada em: quarta-feira, 23 de abr
Thiago Pojda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks everyone for replying, I think those names can change someone's mind
> ;)
>
> -Mensagem original-
> De: mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviada em: quarta-feira, 23 de abril de 2008 15:48
> Para: Thiago Pojda
> Cc: php-general@lists.
On 23 Apr 2008, at 21:41, Steve Gula wrote:
I could but it would make things very difficult. Some of the
entities around
id # 100 could be affected by entities around id #11000 and would
result in
a file needing to be manipulated at the same time. Unfortunately, I
don't
think this is a top
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Thiago Pojda <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks everyone for replying, I think those names can change someone's mind
> ;)
i know where youre coming from; i recall a certain manager once saying to me
'php doesnt scale when it goes OO'. i wanted to take his head
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 13:14 -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Eric Butera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wro
I could but it would make things very difficult. Some of the entities around
id # 100 could be affected by entities around id #11000 and would result in
a file needing to be manipulated at the same time. Unfortunately, I don't
think this is a top to bottom change for the information at hand.
On We
On 4/23/08, Steve Gula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I work for a company that has chosen to use XML (Software AG Tamino XML
> database) as its storage system for an enterprise application. We need to
> make a system wide change to information within the database that isn't
> feasible to do throug
I work for a company that has chosen to use XML (Software AG Tamino XML
database) as its storage system for an enterprise application. We need to
make a system wide change to information within the database that isn't
feasible to do through our application's user interface. My solution was to
unloa
Thanks everyone for replying, I think those names can change someone's mind
;)
-Mensagem original-
De: mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 23 de abril de 2008 15:48
Para: Thiago Pojda
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Assunto: Re: [PHP] Big companies that use PHP?
We're
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 13:14 -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Eric Butera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > interestingly, prototype claims it is a framework.
> >
> > http://www.google.c
On 4/23/08, paragasu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But one project using php in a very clean way. The codeis look so simple.
> yet do so much thing.
> Personally, i vote for www.eyeos.org project for the best php code. Anyone
> know better?
Yes: mine.
:)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.
i have seen many php code. i learn php on my own, and during early days with
php,
i download many open source php project and try to learn the coding on my
own.
i did see many code (ugly, spaghetti code etc). Some even take me few
hours to figure out
how it works.
But one project using php in a v
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Eric Butera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > interestingly, prototype claims it is a framework.
>
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define%3A+framework&btnG=Google+Search
>
> Lots of d
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> interestingly, prototype claims it is a framework.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define%3A+framework&btnG=Google+Search
Lots of differing opinions. :) Seeing as script.aculo.us and all
that stuff is written on Pr
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:29 PM, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 5:24 PM +0300 4/22/08, Sancar Saran wrote:
>
>> Hello there,
>>
>> Is anyone looking jQuery recently ?. Thas what I call framework...
>>
>
> Yes, and I'm programming with it.
>
> But, that's what jQuery and I call a library.
We're using it at Intel on a handful of sites... I think my team is
the only one though :) The apps aren't really "big" but we are a "big"
company using it.
On 4/23/08, Thiago Pojda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I've been asked this common question: What big companies use PHP in big
>
Just found out that Digg, Flickr, fotolog.com are among those. :)
_
De: Bastien Koert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 23 de abril de 2008 15:32
Para: Thiago Pojda
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Assunto: Re: [PHP] Big companies that use PHP?
On 4/23/08, Thiago
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Thiago Pojda <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
>
>
> I've been asked this common question: What big companies use PHP in big
> apps?
>
>
>
> I don't know where to find this kind of stuff and, well. here I am :)
>
>
>
>
>
> Do any of you know?
>
>
>
> And wh
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Thiago Pojda
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
>
>
> I've been asked this common question: What big companies use PHP in big
> apps?
>
>
>
> I don't know where to find this kind of stuff and, well. here I am :)
>
>
>
>
>
> Do any of you know?
>
>
>
> And
On 4/23/08, Thiago Pojda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
>
>
>
> I've been asked this common question: What big companies use PHP in big
> apps?
>
>
>
> I don't know where to find this kind of stuff and, well. here I am :)
>
>
>
>
>
> Do any of you know?
>
>
>
> And what % of the web marke
At 5:24 PM +0300 4/22/08, Sancar Saran wrote:
Hello there,
Is anyone looking jQuery recently ?. Thas what I call framework...
Yes, and I'm programming with it.
But, that's what jQuery and I call a library.
Cheers,
tedd
--
---
http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthst
Hey guys,
I've been asked this common question: What big companies use PHP in big
apps?
I don't know where to find this kind of stuff and, well. here I am :)
Do any of you know?
And what % of the web market share does PHP take?
Thanks,
Thiago Pojda
all,
i have observed breakage in some of the class functionality involving the
scope resolution operator in php after php 5.2.4. in said version strings
holding class names can be used w/ the scope resolution operator to resolve
static members and class constants. this no longer works in php 5.2
At 3:35 PM +0100 4/22/08, Stut wrote:
Tony Marston wrote:
No I'm not.
Shocking and unexpected opinion from the developer of a framework. NOT!
Anyway, I can see this falling into another lengthy discussion so
I'll get my contribution in early to avoid disappointment.
As others have mentione
I wasn't saying I was /telling/ it to go from UTF-8 to ASCII. I was
saying it /was/ going from UTF-8 to ASCII, despite the fact that I was
telling it to go from UTF-8 to UTF-8.
And as noted previously in this thread, it turned out to be because
mb_detect_encoding was /mistakenly/ detecting it
At 11:28 AM -0400 4/23/08, Robert William Vesterman wrote:
A little additional info: The "ASCII to ASCII"
case for "Minnie=Mouse" is merely because the
UTF-8 encoding for "Mouse" is the same as the
ASCII encoding for "Mouse", and
mb_detect_encoding is matching on ASCII before
UTF-8. So that'
And the culprit is that mb_detect_order() wasn't set up to handle
ISO-8859-1. It was "ASCII, UTF-8". Changing it to "ASCII, UTF-8,
ISO-8859-1" makes everything work as expected.
Robert William Vesterman wrote:
OK, now the problem seems to be not that mb_convert_encoding is
encoding incorrect
OK, now the problem seems to be not that mb_convert_encoding is encoding
incorrectly, it's that mb_detect_encoding is detecting incorrectly.
It's claiming that the raw string as received from the browser is UTF-8,
where in reality it seems to be ISO-8859-1. Sample code:
Minnie
echo
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Robert William Vesterman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've run into a problem where mb_convert_encoding seems to be converting to
> ASCII, even though I'm telling it to convert to UTF-8. This is with PHP
> version 4.3.11.
>
> I had been asking it to convert from
A little additional info: The "ASCII to ASCII" case for "Minnie=Mouse"
is merely because the UTF-8 encoding for "Mouse" is the same as the
ASCII encoding for "Mouse", and mb_detect_encoding is matching on ASCII
before UTF-8. So that's not an issue.
But, the "UTF-8 to ASCII" case for "Minnie=M
At the risk of extending this already looong thread...
Ah, screw it.
I actually read all of the Radicore documentation on Monday following
someone's suggestion last week about module access control. That was
before this thread got started, BTW. Now I'm not a Framework guy at
all, and I don't know
I've run into a problem where mb_convert_encoding seems to be converting
to ASCII, even though I'm telling it to convert to UTF-8. This is with
PHP version 4.3.11.
I had been asking it to convert from "auto" to UTF-8, so at first I
thought maybe "auto" was not the right choice. So I called
[snip]
Let me know when as I could do with a good laugh.
[/snip]
Fair enough, you have already given me several! :)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 13:46 +0200, Aschwin Wesselius wrote:
> Lester Caine wrote:
> > 'If it isn't broken don't fix it' causes a problem when YOU know that
> > the step change will make future development easier, but the customers
> > keep asking - 'Can you just add XXX' :(
>
> So they actu
Lester Caine wrote:
'If it isn't broken don't fix it' causes a problem when YOU know that
the step change will make future development easier, but the customers
keep asking - 'Can you just add XXX' :(
So they actually ask for a porn site?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
Tony Marston wrote:
Audit logging - http://www.tonymarston.net/php-mysql/auditlog.html
Workflow - http://www.tonymarston.net/php-mysql/workflow.html
Yuck - MySQL :(
A decent database has it's own logging stuff built in ;)
And a decent database library does not care which database you use :)
I
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 19:05 -0500, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> Tony Marston wrote:
> > ""Jay Blanchard"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [snip]
> >>> You haven't answered the question. Where can this piece of wizardry be
> >>> downloaded so that it can be reviewed
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 01:02 +0800, paragasu wrote:
> > imagine a cms, like drupal or joomla. you install the thing w/ the web
> > based installer then go through adding content via the web interface; u
> > can
> > do it :D
> >
> > -nathan
> >
>
> i am going to miss the fun doing programming then
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 10:07 -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 9:54 AM, paragasu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > i can only think of copy & paste method if i were required to write a PHP
> > application
> > without a single line of code even a simple "hello world!" application.
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 22:11 +0800, paragasu wrote:
> >I'm guessing, since you quoted os-commerce and phpBB, you don't know
> >shit code when you see it. Just because it's popular doesn't mean the
> >code is good. Have you ever tried to modify either of these? What a
> >mess.
> honestly, i don't an
58 matches
Mail list logo
