Chuck wrote:
That is exactly what I am using now but the location I am redirecting
to is loading within the tags and at the top level of the
browser.
Are you using AJAX to load the page?
--
Regards,
Anup Shukla
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://
Chuck wrote:
That is exactly what I am using now but the location I am redirecting
to is loading within the tags and at the top level of the
browser.
-CC
On 1/12/08, Jim Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chuck wrote:
I have some code doing some checks that sit inside div tags using href elemen
That is exactly what I am using now but the location I am redirecting
to is loading within the tags and at the top level of the
browser.
-CC
On 1/12/08, Jim Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chuck wrote:
> > I have some code doing some checks that sit inside div tags using href
> > elements:
>
Chuck wrote:
I have some code doing some checks that sit inside div tags using href elements:
...
Panel1
...
In code.php, if various conditions aren't met, this script will do a
bunch of house cleaning, logging, then redirect using
header("Location: /some_url").
My problem is that
I have some code doing some checks that sit inside div tags using href elements:
...
Panel1
...
In code.php, if various conditions aren't met, this script will do a
bunch of house cleaning, logging, then redirect using
header("Location: /some_url").
My problem is that /some_url comes
Terry Calie wrote:
Hey... thanks for the replies. I installed the headers feature that
Richard suggested and found that no headers were output.
I started to transfer my php to another site to see if the problem
replicated and I wasn't able to recreate the problem.
It turns out that I "require"
Hi Lucas,
This is it http://www.suphp.org/Home.html. However, please bear in mind that
you may have some headaches after installing it. Some webmail scripts may
break, as well as existing websites, so you'd better off researching what
are the possible drawbacks.
My recommendation would be that if
Hi Guys,
Anybody knows of a free and decent PHP Multilanguage guestbook (or at least
supporting German and English)? I don't care if it is db-driven or uses flat
files.
I know how to write one, but it's for a website we didn't develop (but will
now host) and I'm feeling a bit lazy... maybe someone
Hello,
on 01/12/2008 07:28 AM Per Jessen said the following:
>> Still if you want the fastest delivery in the world, you can skip
>> queueing and talk directly to the final SMTP server. That is what the
>> direct_delivery mode of this SMTP class does. I use it for deliverying
>> really urgent mess
Hey... thanks for the replies. I installed the headers feature that
Richard suggested and found that no headers were output.
I started to transfer my php to another site to see if the problem
replicated and I wasn't able to recreate the problem.
It turns out that I "require" a file before t
Hello to everybody,
I am using the following function in order to search in multi-dimensional
array, as per note added on http://it.php.net/array_search,
[code]
function array_search_recursive($data0, $FinRecSet, $a=0, $nodes_temp=array()){
global $nodes_found;
$a++;
foreach ($FinRecSet as $
At 12:10 PM -0500 1/12/08, Eric Butera wrote:
On 1/12/08, Naz Gassiep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm using simplexml to fetch data from a set of data files. If I have
two files, and one is an update to the other, is there an easy way to
merge the two files together, rather than having write l
On 1/12/08, Naz Gassiep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using simplexml to fetch data from a set of data files. If I have
> two files, and one is an update to the other, is there an easy way to
> merge the two files together, rather than having write logic that checks
> one and then the other?
>
>
On 1/12/08, Scott Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> well thats just no good is it :P
>
> Thats pretty funky, congrats on the concept and implementation :)
>
> Daniel Brown wrote:
> > On Jan 11, 2008 4:11 PM, Jason Pruim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hate to shot a hole in your script Dan.
On Jan 12, 2008 10:41 AM, Zoltán Németh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008. 01. 12, szombat keltezéssel 10.25-kor tedd ezt írta:
> > At 4:00 PM -0500 1/11/08, PostTrack [Dan Brown] wrote:
> > > Posting Summary for PHP-General List
> > > Week Ending: Friday, 11 January, 2008
> > >
> > >
2008. 01. 12, szombat keltezéssel 10.25-kor tedd ezt írta:
> At 4:00 PM -0500 1/11/08, PostTrack [Dan Brown] wrote:
> > Posting Summary for PHP-General List
> > Week Ending: Friday, 11 January, 2008
> >
> > Messages| Bytes | Sender
> > +
At 4:10 PM -0500 1/11/08, Daniel Brown wrote:
THAT was the way it was supposed to work. Though in all of the
chaos, I forgot to fix the percentage factoring.
It might be interesting to see how "focused" the posts are.
For example, two people answering the same thread make the same
commen
At 4:00 PM -0500 1/11/08, PostTrack [Dan Brown] wrote:
Posting Summary for PHP-General List
Week Ending: Friday, 11 January, 2008
Messages| Bytes | Sender
+-+--
226 (100%) 255776 (10
I'm using simplexml to fetch data from a set of data files. If I have
two files, and one is an update to the other, is there an easy way to
merge the two files together, rather than having write logic that checks
one and then the other?
Both files conform to the same DTD and thus the data in t
On Jan 12, 2008 4:12 AM, Andrés Robinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess what you are looking for is mod_suphp. STFW or ask the list, someone
> will give you good hints for sure (sorry, have little time right now).
>
> Rob
Thanks, I will take a look.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php
Per Jessen wrote:
Richard Heyes wrote:
Bearing in mind I haven't yet done any benchmarks, which do you think
is faster - SMTP with multiple RCPT commands or the PHP mail()
function (with it launching a separate sendmail process for each
mail() function call)?
I've done some rough b
Note - this was one call to mail():
mail(",, ..",subject,text);
Granted, but as long as the email stays the same size when you compare
mail() and something like SMTP, I wouldn't imagine the relative speeds
varying significantly. Or maybe they would, I'll compare and see.
--
Richard He
well thats just no good is it :P
Thats pretty funky, congrats on the concept and implementation :)
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Jan 11, 2008 4:11 PM, Jason Pruim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hate to shot a hole in your script Dan... But my posts aren't
listed :P and I had a few on Jan 8 :)
Where s
Richard Heyes wrote:
>> 1. Using mail(), same email sent to 1000 users.
>>
>> Script finished in 200ms (1000 emails delivered to local MTA).
>> Delivery to target MTA over 100Mbit LAN took about 6s.
>
> That settles it then. The mail() command will be more than fast enough
> for my needs.
>
> T
1. Using mail(), same email sent to 1000 users.
Script finished in 200ms (1000 emails delivered to local MTA).
Delivery to target MTA over 100Mbit LAN took about 6s.
That settles it then. The mail() command will be more than fast enough
for my needs.
Thanks.
--
Richard Heyes
http://www.web
Richard Heyes wrote:
> Bearing in mind I haven't yet done any benchmarks, which do you think
> is faster - SMTP with multiple RCPT commands or the PHP mail()
> function (with it launching a separate sendmail process for each
> mail() function call)?
>
I've done some rough benchmarking -
1. Usi
Assuming you're talking delivery to a local MTA (which will
subsequently do the remote delivery), is speed really important?
For the amount of email I'm looking at (1000s, growing), yes.
Hmm, that's not quite what I was thinking of. The amount of emails to
be delivered does not in my opinion
Manuel Lemos wrote:
> Still if you want the fastest delivery in the world, you can skip
> queueing and talk directly to the final SMTP server. That is what the
> direct_delivery mode of this SMTP class does. I use it for deliverying
> really urgent messages. It uses PHP only, there is no sendmail
Richard Heyes wrote:
>> Assuming you're talking delivery to a local MTA (which will
>> subsequently do the remote delivery), is speed really important?
>
> For the amount of email I'm looking at (1000s, growing), yes.
>
Hmm, that's not quite what I was thinking of. The amount of emails to
be d
29 matches
Mail list logo
