Re: [Pharo-users] Literals

What would entail actually extending the syntax and adding the set literal? >From my brief observations (when I was discussing this with OP on discord): * adding a new AST node * extend RBParser * extend IRMethod/IRTranslator... maybe generating bytecode for `{ ... } asSet` instead would be enoug

[Pharo-users] Pharo 7 image, some more size reducation

Hi, Pharo7 has proven to be a reliable host for Dr. Geo, and thank you for your advices and helps. In the past weeks several screenshots  were posted on DrGeo twitter, all based on P7 built. Many notable tools or frameworks like Tonel, Glamour tool kit, Calypso, Metacello, VM builts have prov

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 7 image, some more size reducation

Le 28/04/2018 à 11:16, Hilaire a écrit : > Hi, > > Pharo7 has proven to be a reliable host for Dr. Geo, and thank you for > your advices and helps. In the past weeks several screenshots  were > posted on DrGeo twitter, all based on P7 built. Many notable tools or > frameworks like Tonel, Glamour t

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 7 image, some more size reducation

I have a 6 days old image. Aha, so it explained why the image suddenly get smaller. Thanks Hilaire Le 28/04/2018 à 11:20, Cyril Ferlicot D. a écrit : Nautilus was removed 7days ago: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1231 Versionner and Kommiter 4days ago: https://github.com/pharo-

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 7 image, some more size reducation

On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Hilaire wrote: > Hi, > > Pharo7 has proven to be a reliable host for Dr. Geo, and thank you for > your advices and helps. In the past weeks several screenshots were posted > on DrGeo twitter, all based on P7 built. Many notable tools or frameworks > like Tonel,

Re: [Pharo-users] Literals

A On 28 April 2018 at 20:21, Peter Uhnák wrote: > What would entail actually extending the syntax and adding the set literal? > > From my brief observations (when I was discussing this with OP on discord): > > * adding a new AST node > * extend RBParser > * extend IRMethod/IRTranslator... maybe

[Pharo-users] [Ann] Iceberg 0.7.4

Hi all, Time for the weekly Iceberg update. The next pharo build will include Iceberg 0.7.4, with many improvements done during this last week. Documentation wise, all documentation/workflow valid for 0.7.3 is still valid for 0.7.4. Thanks to all brave users, issue reporters and contributors :).

Re: [Pharo-users] Literals (Richard O'Keefe)

Can you please tell more about ##() thing?

Re: [Pharo-users] Literals

Hi. сб, 28 апр. 2018 г., 1:26 Richard Sargent < richard.sarg...@gemtalksystems.com>: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 3:58 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo < > emaring...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> oh, you were talking about how te VM views the object, >> I was thinking in terms of how the compiler sees the text. >>

Re: [Pharo-users] Literals

Debiller 777 wrote > You know, literals are quite useful in case when you want to shorten some > object initialization. For example #() and {} for arrays and $[]for byte > arrays. However, if there is a way to add custom literals, for example for > sets (something like #{} I guess)? how to do it? a

Re: [Pharo-users] Literals

Denis Kudriashov wrote > We have similar mechanizm in Pharo. Look at > http://dionisiydk.blogspot.fr/2016/07/magic-with-pharo-reflectivity.html Wow! That's really cool. I like that we can do it without adding *any* syntax. Tiny syntax is one of the more special things about the Smalltalk language.

[Pharo-users] Smalltalk-76 Demo

https://youtu.be/NqKyHEJe9_w -- Bernardo E.C. Sent from a cheap desktop computer in South America.