[Pharo-users] (no subject)

I recently discovered the pharo launcher. However, it only gives me options to use outdated images, and I'm not sure about the vm. Is there any way to change this?

Re: [Pharo-users] including Pillar in Pharo image by default

Hi, > Am 11.08.2017 um 21:10 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano : > > hi, > >> On 11 Aug 2017, at 18:57, Cyril Ferlicot D. > > wrote: >> >> Another step would be to get a minimal parser not relying on >> PetitParser. > > Let’s think differently: why not to include a t

Re: [Pharo-users] (no subject)

On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Vityou . wrote: > I recently discovered the pharo launcher. However, it only gives me > options to use outdated images, and I'm not sure about the vm. Is there > any way to change this? > Usually it will download the right vm for your image so you don't have t

[Pharo-users] Probably a bug in Garage SQLite

Hello! This testing code: | databaseFile login accessor sqlString | databaseFile := Smalltalk imageDirectory asFileReference / 'play.sqlite'. login := Login new database: SQLite3Platform new; host: ''; port:

[Pharo-users] pharo config problem

Hi, I have a problem with connection to a private smalltalkhub rep from the command line with pharo config. I think I set the --username and --password options correctly, but I always get: ZnHttpUnsuccessful: 403 Forbidded If I make the rep public then there is no access problem. Any hints what

Re: [Pharo-users] pharo config problem

Hi johannes I do not know how to help you but this is strange. We managed our synectique private code on STHub and it works. Now STHub is getting stranger and stranger. So may be your passwrd got desync. Esteban? if you read this mail. Can you check when you are back from vacation? Stef On Sun,

Re: [Pharo-users] Probably a bug in Garage SQLite

Hi Herby On which version of Pharo are you trying? Because lot of changes happened on Pharo 60 FFI. Stef On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Herby Vojčík wrote: > Hello! > > This testing code: > > | databaseFile login accessor sqlString | > databaseFile := Smalltalk imageDirectory asFileRe

Re: [Pharo-users] (no subject)

Christophe did a pass because he faced the same problem and he improved the situation. Now he left on vacation (and was stopped because of a huge jenkins crash because he left) and I do not know the status. (because we are also annoyed and sorry than you by the situation). Stef On Sun, Aug 13,

Re: [Pharo-users] Probably a bug in Garage SQLite

Stephane Ducasse wrote: Hi Herby On which version of Pharo are you trying? Because lot of changes happened on Pharo 60 FFI. Stef On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Herby Vojčík wrote: Hello! This testing code: | databaseFile login accessor sqlString | databaseFile := Smalltalk image

Re: [Pharo-users] Probably a bug in Garage SQLite

Do you have the same bug in 5.0? Because I do not know if garage was really tested on 60. Stef On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Herby Vojčík wrote: > Stephane Ducasse wrote: >> >> Hi Herby >> >> On which version of Pharo are you trying? Because lot of changes >> happened on Pharo 60 FFI. >> >> S

Re: [Pharo-users] Probably a bug in Garage SQLite

Stephane Ducasse wrote: Do you have the same bug in 5.0? Because I do not know if garage was really tested on 60. Don't know (don't have it), but last commit in Garage-SQLite GuillermoPolito.26 from 2016. The mentioned #nbBindingOf: is sent at no place at all in the image (except supersend in

Re: [Pharo-users] including Pillar in Pharo image by default

Hi tim I personally do not care much about the syntax but I care about what I can do with it (ref, cite, ... ) I cannot write books in markdown because reference to figures!! were missing. And of course a parser because markdown is not really nice to parse and I will not write a parser becaus

Re: [Pharo-users] pharo config problem

Hi Stef, the connection from a Monticello Browser in a local image with same username and password works fine. Johannes > Am 13.08.2017 um 20:34 schrieb Stephane Ducasse : > > Hi johannes > > I do not know how to help you but this is strange. > We managed our synectique private code on STHub a

Re: [Pharo-users] Probably a bug in Garage SQLite

ah yes. probably a missing rename during the migration to the new ffi. Stef On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 9:04 PM, Herby Vojčík wrote: > Stephane Ducasse wrote: >> >> Do you have the same bug in 5.0? >> Because I do not know if garage was really tested on 60. > > > Don't know (don't have it), but last

Re: [Pharo-users] Probably a bug in Garage SQLite

Stephane Ducasse wrote: ah yes. probably a missing rename during the migration to the new ffi. Stef Unfortunately there's more: PharoDatabaseAccessor(DatabaseAccessor)>>handleError:for: [ :ex | self handleError: ex for: command ] in [ | result | self checkPermissionFor: command. result := [ (