Should I revert everyone to read-only and add people on specific repos?
On 22 May 2017 at 20:23, Stephane Ducasse wrote:
> Yes I changed because we should clean from time to time.
>
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Serge Stinckwich <
> serge.stinckw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thank you Damien.
Maybe not everyone need to be owner, but everyone in the org need to
be able to commit to all repositories I guess.
Having per-repositories policy is a bit annoying.
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Damien Pollet
wrote:
> Should I revert everyone to read-only and add people on specific repos?
Hello,
This does not work:
RBRenameInstanceVariableRefactoring
rename: 'oldName'
to: 'newName'
in: MyClass
Hilaire
(RBRenameInstanceVariableRefactoring
rename: 'oldName'
to: 'newName'
in: MyClass) execute
2017-05-23 10:50 GMT-03:00 Hilaire :
> Hello,
>
> This does not work:
>
> RBRenameInstanceVariableRefactoring
>
> rename: 'oldName'
>
> to: 'newName'
>
> i
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 01:42:50PM -0700, horrido wrote:
> buffer := String new: 64.
> self ffiCall: #( void get_machine(String buffer) ).
>
> The buffer never receives the string value (it just contains the 64
> initiialized spaces).
See FFICalloutAPITests>>testPrintString.
HTH.
Pierce
Good morning,
Is there any working implementation of PGP/GNUPG functionality in Pharo.
There are some tools for squeak but I´m not sure if they are maintained.
Also need password parsing (both Windows and Linux environments).
Best regards,
Casimiro Barreto
Indeed.
Not so funnily, it breaks the class definition of those using traits :(
Don't know why.
Hilaire
Le 23/05/2017 à 16:11, Hernán Morales Durand a écrit :
>
> (RBRenameInstanceVariableRefactoring
> rename: 'oldName'
> to: 'newName'
> in: MyClass) execute
>
> 2017-05
I just forked the booklet today and was working through it. I don’t know if
your changes were already in there, but most things are working for me. I have
hit a few typos and inconsistencies that I’ve noted and I would recommend a
change to the unit test bit as it feels weird to add a test asser
Je comprends enfin...
I accidentally came across a StackOverflow answer that suggested the String
object is immutable. That makes perfect sense, as I know the C function is
actually /*trying*/ to write to the buffer.
That gave me the idea to use a ByteArray instead. Now, everything works!
horr
> On 24 May 2017, at 01:36, Tim Mackinnon wrote:
>
> I just forked the booklet today and was working through it. I don’t know if
> your changes were already in there, but most things are working for me. I
> have hit a few typos and inconsistencies that I’ve noted and I would
> recommend a cha
10 matches
Mail list logo