And I have added a PolyMath dependency to the configuration file, so now
the Metacello script should update you to the latest stable versions of
everything automatically.
Thanks for pointing it out.
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:05 PM, francescoagati [via Smalltalk] <
ml+s1294792n4944863...@n4.nabble
Dear all,
do we have a package to access the a geocoder service? Something similar
to "geopy".
Volkert
Hi Volkert,
> On 29 Apr 2017, at 15:01, volkert wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> do we have a package to access the a geocoder service? Something similar to
> "geopy".
>
> Volkert
As far as I know there is no such library.
We have it internally, but that part is not open source. But it is not so h
Hi Sven,
thanks for your fast response and the snippets. I scanned the different
geocoder classes from "geopy" and also the OSM Nominatim docs. Indeed,
it is not hard, . but if there is already a package, why not using
it :-)
maybe i start to write such a lib.
Thanks,
Volkert
Am 29.04.
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 04:20:57PM -0400, Rob Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> However, I have discovered by creating new ComposableModel, WindowModel,
> and MorphicWindowAdapter classes that even the SpecInterpreter itself is
> hard-wired to use Morphic.
No, it is not. It has hard wired bindings
Hi
2017-04-29 20:36 GMT+02:00 Peter Uhnak :
> No, it is not. It has hard wired bindings from certain names to morphic
> adapters, but only if you don't actually specify the target calss.
> In other words, if in your #specLayout you specify a name that has a
> binding, then the binding will be use
2017-04-29 20:36 GMT+02:00 Peter Uhnak :
> >
> > You can set the bindings on the class side, but I currently don't see a
> way
> > to say "open this spec using these bindings." In other words, something
> > like:
> >
> > MyApplication new openWithSpecAndBindings: MorphicAdapterBindings.
>
> #open
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 09:22:46PM +0200, Denis Kudriashov wrote:
> Hi
>
> 2017-04-29 20:36 GMT+02:00 Peter Uhnak :
>
> > No, it is not. It has hard wired bindings from certain names to morphic
> > adapters, but only if you don't actually specify the target calss.
> > In other words, if in your #
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 09:24:28PM +0200, Denis Kudriashov wrote:
> 2017-04-29 20:36 GMT+02:00 Peter Uhnak :
>
> > >
> > > You can set the bindings on the class side, but I currently don't see a
> > way
> > > to say "open this spec using these bindings." In other words, something
> > > like:
> >
