Re: [Pharo-users] real world pharo web application set ups

2016-12-15 Thread jtuc...@objektfabrik.de
Victor, Am 14.12.16 um 19:23 schrieb Vitor Medina Cruz: If I tell you that my current estimate is that a Smalltalk image with Seaside will not be able to handle more than 20 concurrent users, in many cases even less. Seriously? That is kinda a low number, I would expect more for

Re: [Pharo-users] real world pharo web application set ups

2016-12-15 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
Joachim, > On 15 Dec 2016, at 11:43, jtuc...@objektfabrik.de wrote: > > Victor, > > Am 14.12.16 um 19:23 schrieb Vitor Medina Cruz: >> If I tell you that my current estimate is that a Smalltalk image with >> Seaside will not be able to handle more than 20 concurrent users, in many >> cases eve

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] [ANN] Pharo Association has a new Website!

2016-12-15 Thread Marcus Denker
> On 12 Dec 2016, at 17:42, Marcus Denker wrote: > >> >> On 8 Dec 2016, at 15:59, Marcus Denker > > wrote: >> >> >>> Accepting Bitcoin payments would be a plus ;-) (https://bitpay.com/tour ) >>> >> >> Hi, >> >> I hav

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] [ANN] Pharo Association has a new Website!

2016-12-15 Thread Marcus Denker
> > > Sadly I had to remove everything as BitPay is not compatible with the legal > structure of the association right now (dealing with US based companies wrt. > money is getting very hard these days). > > So for us, using bitpay is sadly no option at this point. > I will explore http://coinw

Re: [Pharo-users] real world pharo web application set ups

2016-12-15 Thread Vitor Medina Cruz
> > > On 14 Dec 2016, at 23:29, Vitor Medina Cruz > wrote: > > > > Pharo don't have non-blocking I/O? > It certainly does at the networking level, but some native code interfaces > might not act so nice. Humm, I asked because those times I experimented slow I/O processing and the image seems to

Re: [Pharo-users] real world pharo web application set ups

2016-12-15 Thread Vitor Medina Cruz
Joachim seriously, I think 20 is very optimistic for several reasons. (...) Whoa! Thanks for the careful and insightful response, I really appreciate that! :) On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > Joachim, > > > On 15 Dec 2016, at 11:43, jtuc...@objektfabrik.de wro