Hi,
sorry late response, I just missed this mails.
but… I do not have much to say… what you did should work.
Except (I think I’d need to look at your code closer) you need to change the
argument of argv to FFIExternalArray*, or you need to pass the handle to the
function. Something like thi
Hi Tudor,
thank you for the explanation, which explains the situation.
Speaking only for me: I never used custom debuggers, I always used the
default debugger in different smalltalk IDEs and so, I am used to a kind of
"standard". But as your signature points out "Every thing should have the
right
Hi,
> On 04 Jun 2016, at 12:18, Sabine Manaa wrote:
>
> Hi Tudor,
>
> thank you for the explanation, which explains the situation.
>
> Speaking only for me: I never used custom debuggers, I always used the
> default debugger in different smalltalk IDEs and so,
one could say you never used
Hi,
but this will not work either (I just realised). This is complicated matter and
confuses many (even me, some times :P).
I will try explain.
Technically, when you do
array := (FFIExternalArray externalNewType: 'void*' size: parameters size)
autoRelease.
you are declaring (in C)
(void*)
Hi,
> On Jun 4, 2016, at 12:18 PM, Sabine Manaa wrote:
>
> Hi Tudor,
>
> thank you for the explanation, which explains the situation.
>
> Speaking only for me: I never used custom debuggers, I always used the
> default debugger in different smalltalk IDEs and so, I am used to a kind of
> "s
Hi,
There were a couple of emails in the recent period that questioned the
usefulness of moldability (the ability of developers to customize their tools
deeply and inexpensively). More specifically, the question was about the
moldability of the GTDebugger.
I put together a couple of thoughts o
Hello.
I am following #PharoMOOC and it become more and more exciting.
I were doing TinyBlog exercise and I got an issue. I looked at the forum
but any solution and I am stuck now like many others.
I have created my class TBApplicationRootComponent, create a server that
listen at :8080 and start
Le 04/06/2016 19:00, Cheikhou Oumar KA a écrit :
> Hello.
>
> I am following #PharoMOOC and it become more and more exciting.
>
> I were doing TinyBlog exercise and I got an issue. I looked at the forum
> but any solution and I am stuck now like many others.
>
> I have created my class TBApplica
Hi,
> On Jun 4, 2016, at 7:09 PM, Ben Coman wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Gabriel Cotelli wrote:
> Hi,
> I undestand and really liked the idea of a moldable debugger and it's true
> that the button actions act over the stack, however the decision on what
> action to use is
> Hi,
> I think I already got this problem when I loaded Seaside 3.2 in an image
> where Seaside 3.1 was present.
Thanks for this.
2016-06-04 17:10 GMT+00:00 Cyril Ferlicot D. :
> Le 04/06/2016 19:00, Cheikhou Oumar KA a écrit :
> > Hello.
> >
> > I am following #PharoMOOC and it become more a
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> On Jun 4, 2016, at 7:09 PM, Ben Coman wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Gabriel Cotelli wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I undestand and really liked the idea of a moldable debugger and it's true
>> that the button actions act over
Hi Cheikhou
We will have a look. I will contact Luc and Damien because I do not
follow the Seaside set up.
May be we messed up with the setup of the seaside image we gave you.
Did you save your code?
So that you can reload it with the
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/Seaside/
On Jun 4, 2016 14:11, "Ben Coman" wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Gabriel Cotelli
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I undestand and really liked the idea of a moldable debugger and it's
>>> true that the button actions act over the stack, however the decision on
>>> what action to use i
Hi,
> On Jun 4, 2016, at 7:34 PM, Ben Coman wrote:
>
> Nice read and some interesting statistics.
Thanks
> It makes sense when laid
> out like that, but its a question of internalising the knowledge to
> make use of moldability more often.
Indeed. This is a challenge. In this regard, picking
I like the way you react to my criticisms. In fact each time I complain
you make progress. You should really thank me in fact.
And you can name me if it makes you feel better. ;)
Now what you should measure is the ratio
over engineering - complexity of the solution vs. spread of usage.
Hi Stef
> You got a problem with such image
>
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/PharoWeb/PHARO=50,VERSION=stable,VM=vm/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/PharoWeb.zip
Yes I saved my code in Smalltalkhub. i loaded it in this new image and It
works perfectly.
May be there the problem come from
Not now. This would be another thing to approach from a moldable point of view.
Doru
> On May 27, 2016, at 3:55 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Is there a way to provide a strategy to complete code in GT?
> For example, if I would like to specialize the completion in case I am
> writ
Hello All,
I am new to Pharo and Smalltalk in general. I have been experimenting with
Pharo 5 trying to get acquainted with the environment and the language. I have
been having some issues with the image hanging and crashing. This happens when
trying code in the Play Ground and especially when
Hi Stef,
> On Jun 4, 2016, at 8:38 PM, stepharo wrote:
>
> I like the way you react to my criticisms. In fact each time I complain you
> make progress. You should really thank me in fact.
Thanks for reading.
I try my best to welcome criticism even when the tone is not appropriate. I do
not a
Hi,
Pharo 5 is the current release, and you should use this one :).
Do you have a specific scenario that we can use to reproduce the crashing
behavior?
Cheers,
Doru
> On Jun 4, 2016, at 11:48 PM, Gerry Weaver wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> I am new to Pharo and Smalltalk in general. I have bee
Hi Cheikhou,
Ok, this is good that you found a solution.
Can you post your solution on the MOOC forum to help other people that
might be blocked?
Thanks,
#Luc
2016-06-04 20:58 GMT+02:00 Cheikhou Oumar KA :
> Hi Stef
>
> > You got a problem with such image
>
> >
> https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-cont
Hi,
I'm afraid I don't have any steps to reproduce the issues at the moment. I was
just playing around and it hung or crashed frequently enough that it became a
bit tedious. I just wondered, if anyone else was having problems. It would seem
that I may be alone in this, so I'll try to figure out
Hi all,
I'm advancing on the Pharo MOOC trying to catch the rest of the people.
It has been a really interesting learning experience.
Now I'm making the Block lesson on week 2 and I have found the factorial
example with its code. With the quality assistant It noticed no spaces
at the beginni
I wanted to try out Peter's XMI Analyser with Roassal and went to
download Moose but had a couple of problems.
First try...
In the Launcher under Common Tools, I downloaded and Moose 5.1(stable)
fine, but it is Pharo 4, so tried to download Moose 6.0(beta) -- but
got a problem - big pause, no prog
Hi,
This is certainly not something that should happen. Pharo 5 is deemed ready for
production and many of us are using it since a long time :).
It is still possible that you encountered a bug, and having a reproducible case
can help us spot it.
Meanwhile, when you say crashing, do you mean th
Hi,
I'm using the term "hanging" to mean that the image locked up or became
unresponsive. When I use the term "crashing", I mean the image aborted. I have
also seen a few cases where the image would hang first and then abort a few
seconds later. This usually results after a few error windows ha
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Ben Coman wrote:
> I wanted to try out Peter's XMI Analyser with Roassal and went to
> download Moose but had a couple of problems.
>
> First try...
> In the Launcher under Common Tools, I downloaded and Moose 5.1(stable)
> fine, but it is Pharo 4, so tried to downl
Hi,
> On Jun 5, 2016, at 7:34 AM, Ben Coman wrote:
>
> I wanted to try out Peter's XMI Analyser with Roassal and went to
> download Moose but had a couple of problems.
>
> First try...
> In the Launcher under Common Tools, I downloaded and Moose 5.1(stable)
> fine, but it is Pharo 4, so tried t
Hi,
I figured out the problem. When you run that script, you actually load
"4.4-beta.1 [ConfigurationOfMoose]”
This is because of the mismatch between what loadDevelopment means in Gofer and
the meaning of the symbolic version in Metacello.
Instead, please use this:
Metacello new
29 matches
Mail list logo