Hello,
It seems the pharodocs website is broken. Pages for classes are rendered, but
the documentation does not display the messages, only their docstrings. That
makes it quite unusable.
http://files.pharo.org/doc/4.0/#packageList=package.html&classList=package/Kernel.html&classView=class/Proto
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are about to integrate in Pharo a new member of the Glamorous Toolkit:
> the GTDebugger. As this is a significant change that might affect your
> workflow, here is some background information to help you deal with the
> change.
>
> F
Personally I dont mind if its the default or not and I dont judge things
unless i try them for a considerably amount of time.
Pharo is not and will not be begineer friendly for at least the not so
distant future. Its not a matter of whether the GTDebugger becomes the
default or not.
There are a l
> On 10 Jan 2016, at 15:48, Dimitris Chloupis wrote:
>
> Personally I dont mind if its the default or not and I dont judge things
> unless i try them for a considerably amount of time.
>
> Pharo is not and will not be begineer friendly for at least the not so
> distant future. Its not a matt
"I know you mean well, that you only want to encourage people to work on
these areas, but it hurts me (personally) quite a bit if you say it like
that - because statements like that are like a self fulfilling prophecy and
very bad advertising that is hard to counter.
I have written many serious li
Excerpts from Sven Van Caekenberghe's message of 2016-01-10 16:21:10 +0100:
> I have written many serious libraries with lot's of documentation and I have
> supported them for years, I have written standalone articles for various
> audiences and I am active on the ML's; I did my part for your point
Hi,
When I remove a method from a trait, then save, Monticelly complains it
can not find the method in the trait.
Seen on Pharo3
Any idea?
Thanks
--
Dr. Geo
http://drgeo.eu
Hi,
I have taught with (I)Python and Pharo to non programmers or beginners
and I would say, from that direct experience that Pharo is easier
because it has an easier syntax, an uniform way of programming and a
continuity between scripting, apps, code, code management and docs. So I
will be ta
How come?
It would be nice to think that such statements will be read by people
not from our world
and such statements are WRONG!
a) Lack of substantial documentation
b) Complete lack of begineer orientated documentation
c) Lack of substantial begineer friendly libraries
d) Lack of Libraries in
Sorry for the lateness and short reply but I’m involved in a bunch of other
things that are taking almost all of my time ...
From what I understand and what I can see in your code, you want to modify a
widget when the UI is open. However you never trigger the rebuilding of the
window. For examp
It looks much better to me, yes. I would need to use it some time before I
could give more detailed feedback. (And I can’t really do that until the FFI is
fixed, because all my development crashes the VM since I am using Roassal. So I
am still on the last Pharo version before the VM switch.)
On
Dear David,
yes this maybe broken, but most of the time, a Pharo developer will
never have a look to such a static documentation.
You can browse the class and the related methods very easily inside
the Pharo image, without relying on an external tool.
Regards,
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Da
Hello folks.
Some people have already seen me on Twitter and Slack, but I believe there
might be some people on the mailing list that did not see those conversations.
As I have done on Slack, I am writing this introduction so people have an idea
where I come from and what is my business with Ph
Welcome!
To get faster to the intellectual stimulation, pick a task / project and start
asking questions. And have fun :).
Cheers,
Doru
> On Jan 10, 2016, at 11:37 PM, David Allouche wrote:
>
> Hello folks.
>
> Some people have already seen me on Twitter and Slack, but I believe there
> mi
Welcome , David, thats a quite a resume. HyperCard looks like its shares
quite a lot in common with Smalltalk. From what you write I think you will
love Pharo, its a very active, passionate smalltalk community and Pharo is
moving forward very fast since we are constantly growing.
I think you love
Welcome David!
Alexandre
> On Jan 10, 2016, at 6:37 PM, David Allouche wrote:
>
> Hello folks.
>
> Some people have already seen me on Twitter and Slack, but I believe there
> might be some people on the mailing list that did not see those conversations.
>
> As I have done on Slack, I am wr
I could argue about how I agree with you, but only in part.
But the simple fact is this: the documentation is advertised in large letter on
this page: http://pharo.org/documentation
If it's broken, it should be fixed. If the people with the technical access to
fix it do not care, it should be r
Sent from my iPad
> On Jan 10, 2016, at 06:08, Ben Coman wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are about to integrate in Pharo a new member of the Glamorous Toolkit:
>> the GTDebugger. As this is a significant change that might affect your
>>
18 matches
Mail list logo
