Re: [Pharo-users] [Question] Inspecting a collection of strings in Pharo 5 -- edit pane for a string?

2015-12-20 Thread Clément Bera
2015-12-20 8:15 GMT+01:00 Marcus Denker : > > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Strings are supposed to be immutable, and that is why we do not support >> editing by default :). >> >> > I do not think this is good... yes, it would be nice if *literal* strings >

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] Pharo Consortium Sponsored Development Effort

2015-12-20 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
I mentions this because in OSProcess-Unix there is UnixProcess class, at the class side there are several examples that launch a separate instance of Squeak/Pharo and make the two communicate with each other. In the instance of the class there are methods like forkHeadlessSqueak , forkHeadlessSquea

Re: [Pharo-users] [Question] Inspecting a collection of strings in Pharo 5 -- edit pane for a string?

2015-12-20 Thread Marcus Denker
> On 20 Dec 2015, at 09:13, Clément Bera wrote: > > > > 2015-12-20 8:15 GMT+01:00 Marcus Denker >: > > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Tudor Girba > wrote: > Hi, > > Strings are supposed to be immutable, and that is why we do

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] Pharo Consortium Sponsored Development Effort

2015-12-20 Thread Pierce Ng
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 08:56:43AM +, Dimitris Chloupis wrote: > Fuel I assume enters here the equation as a data exchange format , the > problem I have with fuel is that its not backward compatible which for me Once you have a set of OS processes running Pharo how they talk to each other is u

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] [ANN] Pharo Consortium Sponsored Development Effort

2015-12-20 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
not really because as I said UnixProcess already has an implementation for doing this, you dont need any of those protocols/libraries you mentioned, it does not even need Fuel. It already works. And the reason why I mentioned Python multiprocessing module is because multiprocessing does not only i

Re: [Pharo-users] [Question] Inspecting a collection of strings in Pharo 5 -- edit pane for a string?

2015-12-20 Thread Tudor Girba
Awesome. Then could you tell me what is the preferred api to modify strings? Cheers, Doru > On Dec 20, 2015, at 10:03 AM, Marcus Denker wrote: > > >> On 20 Dec 2015, at 09:13, Clément Bera wrote: >> >> >> >> 2015-12-20 8:15 GMT+01:00 Marcus Denker : >> >> >> On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 9:24

Re: [Pharo-users] [Question] Inspecting a collection of strings in Pharo 5 -- edit pane for a string?

2015-12-20 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
I think the original question was how to change one element from a collection by another one, in this case, replace a string by another one, by 'editing' an item, not to destructively modify a string (which would be a bad idea (tm)). Inspect: #('foo' 'bar') copy Go to the Raw view, double-cl

Re: [Pharo-users] Morphic video tutorials

2015-12-20 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
thats Stephan much more to come. I decided to make the video tutorials even sorter, only 3 minutes each so people can easily follow my process. On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 12:09 AM Stephan Eggermont wrote: > On 19/12/15 22:39, Dimitris Chloupis wrote: > > I decided to start making a series of video

[Pharo-users] Support for UNC filereferences?

2015-12-20 Thread Stephan Eggermont
Perhaps we should add a UNC class? From slack: Ilshad Khabibullin [14:05] Hi there! Are UNC `\\server-name\shared-folder-name` in Windows not supposed to be working with FileReference? Ilshad Khabibullin [14:22] looks like it works in VW, for example. I wonder if we can use `\\WIN-SO4HTUV4HA

Re: [Pharo-users] Morphic video tutorials

2015-12-20 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
and the halos tutorial has been uploaded, get it now that is hot :) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwMlDt4zBPM&feature=youtu.be On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 12:29 PM Dimitris Chloupis wrote: > thats Stephan much more to come. I decided to make the video tutorials > even sorter, only 3 minutes each

Re: [Pharo-users] Go Panthers!

2015-12-20 Thread Marcus Denker
Hello, To me your email is completely useless. I have not even the beginning of a clue what you want to say and in which context. We are all busy. This mailing lists get *a lot* of traffic. Could you evaluate in the future if your email contributes something? if not, it might be better to not