Yes we need to stabilize it and get a real document.
On Oct 11, 2013, at 8:23 AM, b...@openinworld.com wrote:
>
> I found it hard to find documentation on Spec beyond [1],[2],[3], some of
> which seem to have changed some syntax since they were written. I've been
> piecing things together to
b...@openinworld.com wrote:
I found it hard to find documentation on Spec beyond [1],[2],[3], some
of which seem to have changed some syntax since they were written.
I've been piecing things together to work out how to set the selected
item with the simplest example I could. Even though it tu
Thanks for the example :)
Indeed, the documentation is a bit outdated since Spec is still improving a lot,
a changing a bit in its API.
One of my goal now is to write proper doc for Spec :)
Ben
On Oct 11, 2013, at 8:23 AM, b...@openinworld.com wrote:
>
> I found it hard to find documentation
Ben
On Oct 11, 2013, at 9:24 AM, b...@openinworld.com wrote:
> b...@openinworld.com wrote:
>>
>> I found it hard to find documentation on Spec beyond [1],[2],[3], some of
>> which seem to have changed some syntax since they were written. I've been
>> piecing things together to work out how t
Thanks Stéphane,
we appreciate that :-)
Best,
Manfred
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> welcome
>
> we like amber :)
>
> Stef
>
> On Oct 10, 2013, at 3:41 PM, Manfred Kröhnert
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I am one of the guys helping Nico with Amber.
> >
> >
Hi Sven,
thanks for the pointers.
I'll have a look over the weekend and report back.
Best,
Manfred
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
> Manfred,
>
> On 10 Oct 2013, at 20:17, Manfred Kröhnert
> wrote:
>
> > Hi again,
> >
> > the webdav share is located on an Own
Benjamin wrote:
Ben
On Oct 11, 2013, at 9:24 AM, b...@openinworld.com wrote:
b...@openinworld.com wrote:
I found it hard to find documentation on Spec beyond [1],[2],[3], some of which seem to have changed some syntax since they were written. I've been piecing th
Benjamin wrote:
Ben
On Oct 11, 2013, at 9:24 AM, b...@openinworld.com wrote:
b...@openinworld.com wrote:
I found it hard to find documentation on Spec beyond [1],[2],[3], some of which seem to have changed some syntax since they were written. I've been piecing th
b...@openinworld.com wrote:
Benjamin wrote:
> Ben
>
> On Oct 11, 2013, at 9:24 AM, b...@openinworld.com wrote:
>
>
>> b...@openinworld.com wrote:
>>
>>> I found it hard to find documentation on Spec beyond [1],[2],[3], some of which seem to have changed some syntax since they were written
Would it be possible to change the name of the selector?
tree selectedItem: (1 -> 11)
for me that implies that the tree contains an actual item (1 -> 11).
What you want is maybe, #selectedPath: or #selectedItem:1 withParents:{11}
My general rule is: Each time you have to use an association or a
I agree with Camillo in that I think it would be better to use specific
selectors, e.g. selectedItem:withParents: as it better reveals the intention.
Just my 2 cents ...
On Oct 11, 2013, at 3:23 PM, Camillo Bruni wrote:
> Would it be possible to change the name of the selector?
>
> tree sele
On Oct 11, 2013, at 2:47 PM, Benjamin
wrote:
> Thanks for the example :)
>
> Indeed, the documentation is a bit outdated since Spec is still improving a
> lot,
> a changing a bit in its API.
>
> One of my goal now is to write proper doc for Spec :)
youpi!
>
> Ben
>
> On Oct 11, 2013, at
On Oct 11, 2013, at 5:52 PM, Manfred Kröhnert
wrote:
> Thanks Stéphane,
>
> we appreciate that :-)
I'm sincere :). I believe that we have an excellent stack for doing web dev
Zinc/Zodiac/Oauth/.… Voyage/Magritte/ Seaside/ Reef/Amber
I would love to have more companies working in Ph
agreed :)
> Would it be possible to change the name of the selector?
>
> tree selectedItem: (1 -> 11)
>
> for me that implies that the tree contains an actual item (1 -> 11).
> What you want is maybe, #selectedPath: or #selectedItem:1 withParents:{11}
>
> My general rule is: Each time you have
Indeed, it was just a first try to have something to build a reflection on :-)
Changing the name is always easier than implementing something new (and it's
also easier to have the community involved at this level).
I think that #selectedItem is somehow wrong in the context of a tree.
I will
Camillo Bruni wrote:
Would it be possible to change the name of the selector?
tree selectedItem: (1 -> 11)
for me that implies that the tree contains an actual item (1 -> 11).
What you want is maybe, #selectedPath: or #selectedItem:1 withParents:{11}
I'd vote for reciprocal methods #se
I would like to thank lusy and jeff for their effort.
Dear All,
let me introduce a new store "PharoShop"
http://www.zazzle.com.au/pharoshop
Please note the products description -
I'm not confident in my english and ready to accept your offers for
inspire the cus
17 matches
Mail list logo
