done :)
On Jun 29, 2013, at 1:47 AM, Paul DeBruicker wrote:
> on smalltalkhub I'm pdebruic and I'd like to be added to that repo. Thanks
>
>
> Paul
>
Hi,
I was using WAFileMetadataLibrary and i found a possible issue with*
**addFileAt:
aPath relativeToRootDirectory: relativeRootDirectory*.
The problem i encountered is that some css with(../img/someImage.png) was
getting pointed towards
*http://localhost:8080/files/img/someImage.png*
rather th
On Jun 29, 2013, at 3:59 PM, Thushar G R wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was using WAFileMetadataLibrary and i found a possible issue with
> addFileAt: aPath relativeToRootDirectory: relativeRootDirectory.
>
> The problem i encountered is that some css with(../img/someImage.png) was
> getting pointed tow
I am not very happy with the current build it seems to be quite random when it
comes to test results. I ran the tests multiple times and I get different
outcomes
each time.
That said, I need somebody to pair program with me on the monkey since there is
currently a non-deterministic bug present
Working on the new class builder I have a hard time figuring out the full trait
semantics.
If I use a trait on instance side, does that imply that its classTrait on the
metaclass?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On 29 June 2013 17:48, Camillo Bruni wrote:
> I am not very happy with the current build it seems to be quite random when it
> comes to test results. I ran the tests multiple times and I get different
> outcomes
> each time.
>
> That said, I need somebody to pair program with me on the monkey sin
On 29 June 2013 20:12, Camillo Bruni wrote:
> Working on the new class builder I have a hard time figuring out the full
> trait
> semantics.
>
> If I use a trait on instance side, does that imply that its classTrait on the
> metaclass?
yes. Trait resembles same dual property as class (it has ins
On Jun 29, 2013, at 8:19 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
> On 29 June 2013 20:12, Camillo Bruni wrote:
>> Working on the new class builder I have a hard time figuring out the full
>> trait
>> semantics.
>>
>> If I use a trait on instance side, does that imply that its classTrait on the
>> metaclass?
On 2013-06-29, at 20:14, Igor Stasenko wrote:
> On 29 June 2013 17:48, Camillo Bruni wrote:
>> I am not very happy with the current build it seems to be quite random when
>> it
>> comes to test results. I ran the tests multiple times and I get different
>> outcomes
>> each time.
>>
>> That s
Logs uses a package called Bindings-Core-tbn.1 that has this description:
/Name: Bindings-Core-tbn.1//
//Author: tbn//
//Time: 11 July 2012, 9:46:06.521 am//
//UUID: 2c28d2f3-610f-a54d-82b1-f421a40394ce//
//Ancestors: //
//
//Initial version from Benoit, see
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail
On 29 June 2013 21:21, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>
> On Jun 29, 2013, at 8:19 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>
>> On 29 June 2013 20:12, Camillo Bruni wrote:
>>> Working on the new class builder I have a hard time figuring out the full
>>> trait
>>> semantics.
>>>
>>> If I use a trait on instance side,
look at String >> #format:
On 2013-06-29, at 22:26, Donald wrote:
> Logs uses a package called Bindings-Core-tbn.1 that has this description:
> /Name: Bindings-Core-tbn.1//
> //Author: tbn//
> //Time: 11 July 2012, 9:46:06.521 am//
> //UUID: 2c28d2f3-610f-a54d-82b1-f421a40394ce//
> //Ancestors:
On 2013-06-29, at 22:32, Igor Stasenko wrote:
> On 29 June 2013 21:21, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 29, 2013, at 8:19 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>>
>>> On 29 June 2013 20:12, Camillo Bruni wrote:
Working on the new class builder I have a hard time figuring out the full
trai
yes, i don't know if it good or bad, but i'd rather prefer that traits
applied to Behavior,
but not to Class (which has two entangled behaviors). But maybe for
human comprehension it is better..
but not for implementing, because it certainly makes model more complex.
On 29 June 2013 22:52, Camillo
On 6/29/2013 4:42 PM, Camillo Bruni wrote:
look at String >> #format:
ok, got that fixed.
how do I remove the log4s dependency on
Bindings-Core-tbn.1?
I don't seen anything in the Monticello browser that lets me
unload/unlink/remove etc.
Thanks
On 2013-06-29, at 22:26, Donald wrote:
L
On 2013-06-30, at 00:47, Donald wrote:
> On 6/29/2013 4:42 PM, Camillo Bruni wrote:
>> look at String >> #format:
> ok, got that fixed.
>
> how do I remove the log4s dependency on
>
> Bindings-Core-tbn.1?
>
> I don't seen anything in the Monticello browser that lets me
> unload/unlink/remove
On 6/29/2013 6:56 PM, Camillo Bruni wrote:
On 2013-06-30, at 00:47, Donald wrote:
On 6/29/2013 4:42 PM, Camillo Bruni wrote:
look at String >> #format:
ok, got that fixed.
how do I remove the log4s dependency on
Bindings-Core-tbn.1?
I don't seen anything in the Monticello browser that let
Hi Donald,
I guess there should be a ConfigurationOfLog4j (or similar name) that
defines the versions, the baselines, dependencies, etc. Imagine this
(similarly) as a ConfigurationMap. So I guess what you have to do is to
take ConfigurationOfLog4j, edit the necessary #baselineXXX method and
remove
so let's discuss that on monday with the trait specialists Damien et Sebastian
:)
On 2013-06-29, at 23:34, Igor Stasenko wrote:
> yes, i don't know if it good or bad, but i'd rather prefer that traits
> applied to Behavior,
> but not to Class (which has two entangled behaviors). But maybe for
>
On 6/29/2013 7:00 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Hi Donald,
I guess there should be a ConfigurationOfLog4j (or similar name) that
defines the versions, the baselines, dependencies, etc. Imagine this
(similarly) as a ConfigurationMap. So I guess what you have to do is
to take ConfigurationOf
In Pharo2 you can hit shift+enter to open the 'spotlight' which will
search for classes and method implementors. Start typing the class name
into the box at the top right of the window. It will then start to
autocomplete. You can press the down arrow key to select the class or
method name and hi
And you're probably looking for ConfigurationOfLog4s rather than Log4j.
On 06/29/2013 04:04 PM, Donald wrote:
> On 6/29/2013 7:00 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>> Hi Donald,
>>
>> I guess there should be a ConfigurationOfLog4j (or similar name) that
>> defines the versions, the baselines,
On 2013-06-30, at 00:56, Camillo Bruni wrote:
>
> On 2013-06-30, at 00:47, Donald wrote:
>
>> On 6/29/2013 4:42 PM, Camillo Bruni wrote:
>>> look at String >> #format:
>> ok, got that fixed.
>>
>> how do I remove the log4s dependency on
>>
>> Bindings-Core-tbn.1?
>>
>> I don't seen anythin
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Camillo Bruni wrote:
>
> On 2013-06-30, at 00:56, Camillo Bruni wrote:
>
> >
> > On 2013-06-30, at 00:47, Donald wrote:
> >
> >> On 6/29/2013 4:42 PM, Camillo Bruni wrote:
> >>> look at String >> #format:
> >> ok, got that fixed.
> >>
> >> how do I remove the log
On 6/29/2013 7:13 PM, Camillo Bruni wrote:
ok. got it. I was in the wrong browser.
The new version 17 of log4s in ss3.gemstone works without the dependency
on Benoits Bindings package.
Thanks to everyone for their help.
Back into the arms of Envy. ;-)
--
Donald [|]
A bad day in [] is bette
Hi,
Given that I now have both the newer VM and image from the Ubuntu Pharo PPA,
and the VM and image from PBE, opening a file browser and clicking on an
image saved from PBE fails, because it wants to open the newer VM.
No problem. I'll just use pharo.sh from the CLI. Oh, wait. It always wants
26 matches
Mail list logo
