Re: [Pharo-users] pharo _looks_ good, but can be improved ...

Le 25/1/15 16:57, kilon alios a écrit : frankly I dont see why people keep linking this design document. Google has no clue about good design as most software companies, they definitely droped the ball in that area with Android. But that is my opinion. Pharo can be definetly be improved in sev

Re: [Pharo-users] pharo _looks_ good, but can be improved ...

Did you see the animation roassal is doing. Le 25/1/15 15:35, Aliaksei Syrel a écrit : On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Mayuresh Kathe > wrote: http://www.google.com/design/spec/material-design/introduction.html It is almost impossible to do it like this in Pha

Re: [Pharo-users] pharo _looks_ good, but can be improved ...

These are pharo-dev discussions, not pharo-users discussions. This is about stuff (far) in the future, not current usage. > On 25 Jan 2015, at 18:51, Aliaksei Syrel wrote: > > Hi, > > What will happen with Athens when Pharo moves to Spur? As I know NativeBoost > doesn't work in Spur yet > > C

Re: [Pharo-users] pharo _looks_ good, but can be improved ...

Hi, What will happen with Athens when Pharo moves to Spur? As I know NativeBoost doesn't work in Spur yet Cheers, Alex On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > > On 25 Jan 2015, at 17:39, Nicolai Hess wrote: > > > Am 25.01.2015 16:20 schrieb "Esteban Lorenzano" : > > > > Bu

Re: [Pharo-users] pharo _looks_ good, but can be improved ...

> On 25 Jan 2015, at 17:39, Nicolai Hess wrote: > > > Am 25.01.2015 16:20 schrieb "Esteban Lorenzano" >: > > > > But next year we will have an Athens based UI, so the performance will > > improve dramatically :) > > Yes? What? Bloc or morphic on top of athens ? >

Re: [Pharo-users] pharo _looks_ good, but can be improved ...

Am 25.01.2015 16:20 schrieb "Esteban Lorenzano" : > > But next year we will have an Athens based UI, so the performance will improve dramatically :) Yes? What? Bloc or morphic on top of athens ? And what makes you think, Athens is fast er? > Real problem is to invest time (and talent) to improve

Re: [Pharo-users] pharo _looks_ good, but can be improved ...

frankly I dont see why people keep linking this design document. Google has no clue about good design as most software companies, they definitely droped the ball in that area with Android. But that is my opinion. Pharo can be definetly be improved in several areas but it has been already a huge imp

Re: [Pharo-users] pharo _looks_ good, but can be improved ...

But next year we will have an Athens based UI, so the performance will improve dramatically :) Real problem is to invest time (and talent) to improve current design... It costs much more than you could believe. Esteban > On 25/1/2015, at 15:42, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 25, 201

Re: [Pharo-users] pharo _looks_ good, but can be improved ...

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 03:35:40PM +0100, Aliaksei Syrel wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: > > > http://www.google.com/design/spec/material-design/introduction.html > > > It is almost impossible to do it like this in Pharo now because of low > drawing performance a

Re: [Pharo-users] pharo _looks_ good, but can be improved ...

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: > http://www.google.com/design/spec/material-design/introduction.html It is almost impossible to do it like this in Pharo now because of low drawing performance and bad support of animations. Sad but true. Cheers, Alex

Re: [Pharo-users] pharo _looks_ good, but can be improved ...

On 2015-01-25 19:30, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: while i admire what the pharo team has done with it's user interface, i believe it can be improved. has google's "material design" been considered off-late? do take a look at; http://www.google.com/design/ actually, a more precise 'url' would be as bel