> Am 15.09.2014 um 23:54 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe :
>
>
>> On 15 Sep 2014, at 23:47, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
>>
>> Uko2 wrote
>>> about pharo not being a smalltalk... is it true?
>>
>> Oh goodie... it's been a few weeks and I've been craving one of these
>> threads ;)
>
> Actually, we
nuke it from orbit only way to be sure , this and "smalltalk is dead"
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe
wrote:
>
> On 15 Sep 2014, at 23:47, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
>
> > Uko2 wrote
> >> about pharo not being a smalltalk... is it true?
> >
> > Oh goodie... it's been a few
On 15 Sep 2014, at 23:47, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
> Uko2 wrote
>> about pharo not being a smalltalk... is it true?
>
> Oh goodie... it's been a few weeks and I've been craving one of these
> threads ;)
Actually, we were not talking about this at all when you were gone, it always
starts when y
Uko2 wrote
> about pharo not being a smalltalk... is it true?
Oh goodie... it's been a few weeks and I've been craving one of these
threads ;)
-
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/not-a-smalltalk-tp4776586p4778202.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users ma
On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 06:09:15PM +0200, Thierry Goubier wrote:
> Yes. Who remember the differences between Envy / Parcplace /
> Digitalk / Smalltalk-mt / Smalltalk/X / Dolphin Smalltalk ?
I still play with Smalltalk/X. It is very different from Pharo, but it is an
implementation of Smalltalk non
On 06 Sep 2014, at 17:42, p...@highoctane.be wrote:
> At the moment I am running Pharo every single day for all day long and it is
> a great recurring experience.
Good for you !
Le 06/09/2014 16:36, stepharo a écrit :
In my opinion, this dialect thing is getting increasingly silly. And
confusing. And silly.
It is not getting. It was like that already back in 1998 and before too.
Yes. Who remember the differences between Envy / Parcplace / Digitalk /
Smalltalk-mt /
themselves
Smalltalk, but which do not implement essential parts of standard
Smalltalk. So where does the ‘have to make it compatible’ come from?
>>>
>>> Peter Kenny
>>>
>>> From: Pharo-users [mailto:pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org] On
Behalf Of kilon alios
In my opinion, this dialect thing is getting increasingly silly. And
confusing. And silly.
It is not getting. It was like that already back in 1998 and before too.
The syntax is one thing the libraries are another one!
BTW I opened last year a VW from 1994 and I do not want to live there :)
boun...@lists.pharo.org] On
Behalf Of kilon alios
Sent: 05 September 2014 19:46
To: Any question about pharo is welcome
Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] not a smalltalk!
AFAIK
Pharo technically is not even compatible with Squeak which is where it
forks form.
parts of standard
> Smalltalk. So where does the ‘have to make it compatible’ come from?
>
> Peter Kenny
>
> *From:* Pharo-users [mailto:pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org
> ] *On Behalf Of *kilon alios
> *Sent:* 05 September 2014 19:46
> *To:* Any question about pharo is welcome
haro.org] On Behalf Of
> kilon alios
> Sent: 05 September 2014 19:46
> To: Any question about pharo is welcome
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] not a smalltalk!
>
> AFAIK Pharo technically is not even compatible with Squeak which is where it
> forks form.
>
> You assume t
compatible’ come from?
Peter Kenny
From: Pharo-users [mailto:pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org] On Behalf Of
kilon alios
Sent: 05 September 2014 19:46
To: Any question about pharo is welcome
Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] not a smalltalk!
AFAIK Pharo technically is not even compatible with Squeak
no smalltalk around is “smalltalk”, technically they are all dialects and Pharo
is just one dialect more.
smalltalk-80 itself does not exist since… well, smalltalk-80 :)
so no, your code would not be directly portable to other smalltalks (with the
possible exception of gemstone).
Esteban
On 0
AFAIK Pharo technically is not even compatible with Squeak which is where
it forks form.
You assume the code you write will automatically be incompatible to
smalltalk-80 but since pretty much a huge percentage of the functionality
of Pharo and Smalltalk is in libraries since the language itself is
There is a long story about all that.
But to be short:
- if you call it Smalltalk then you have to make it compatible with other
Smalltalks. And they are a lot in the 80s…
- we want to make something new and cool what may be not always compatible.
So yeah
On 05 Sep 2014, at 20:25, Mayuresh Kath
16 matches
Mail list logo
