Re: [Pharo-users] Questions about MetaLink

2015-05-04 Thread Marcus Denker
> >> For instance, in order to address a layer with no MetaObjects execution, a >> layer with MetaObjects for logging or breakpoints, an other layer with >> custom MetaObjects, etc. >> I don't see how it would be possible to limit the scope of the active layers >> configuration, just for a block e

Re: [Pharo-users] Questions about MetaLink

2015-04-30 Thread Marcus Denker
> On 30 Apr 2015, at 10:29, Glenn Cavarlé wrote: > >> What I am porting now from the prototypes is the functionality to hand > arguments >> over to meta objects. > > Cool, i'm very interested in your implementation for that ! > I hope to have it done next week.. but first my focus is on bre

Re: [Pharo-users] Questions about MetaLink

2015-04-30 Thread Glenn Cavarlé
> What I am porting now from the prototypes is the functionality to hand arguments > over to meta objects. Cool, i'm very interested in your implementation for that ! > One thing I want to add is to make the condition (optionally) into an > object > and then allow reflectivitly to turn on/of lin

Re: [Pharo-users] Questions about MetaLink

2015-04-29 Thread Marcus Denker
> On 29 Apr 2015, at 22:59, Glenn Cavarlé wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm playing with Slots and MethodWrappers to customize instVar > reading/writing and method calls. > In my experiments, Slots and MethodWrappers hold meta-description objects > used at runtime to apply some filters, validations and to