Re: [Pharo-users] GitLab and Pharo

2016-10-20 Thread Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas
Hi, On 20/10/16 12:17, Dimitris Chloupis wrote: Its not about monopoly, its just common logic, if you want the most visibility github remains by far the most popular choice even when compared against other VCSs. [...] Popularity has a circular logic: choose something popular/visible be

Re: [Pharo-users] GitLab and Pharo

2016-10-20 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
well its not much of a problem really, pretty much any git repo website offers ways to mirror repos and keep them in sync. Gitlab also has facilities to import github repos and stay in sync with them. So you can maintain one repo on github and have it automatically update on gitlab and vice versa.

Re: [Pharo-users] GitLab and Pharo

2016-10-20 Thread Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas
Hi, My only underline was about being diverse in infrastructure also. Your personal motivations for choosing GitHub are as good as anyone's for not doing so (including the critical approach Nadja is talking about, which I recommend, again, as a good reading). I don't want to start a holy war

Re: [Pharo-users] GitLab and Pharo

2016-10-20 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
No , no and no My fault if I did not make this clear so let me make this crystal *Under no circumstance choose GitLab over Github unless the following conditions apply* *1) You want unlimited amount of free private repos* *2) You want a 10GB repo* *3) You want a 1GB webpage* *4) You want to depl

Re: [Pharo-users] GitLab and Pharo

2016-10-20 Thread Esteban A. Maringolo
2016-10-20 10:30 GMT-03:00 Esteban Lorenzano : > bitbucket offers infinite private repos too, if you do not want to install a > server by your own. Gitlab also offers a free SaaS, just like GitHub, or you can download Gitlab and use it on your own premises. Esteban A. Maringolo

Re: [Pharo-users] GitLab and Pharo

2016-10-20 Thread Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas
Hi, Anything that encourages diversity should be encouraged too. Of course there is a balance to be found between diversity and fragmentation and we're a small community, but even trying different Git front ends without going to the same (monopolistic?) provider is healthy. For a critical pe

Re: [Pharo-users] GitLab and Pharo

2016-10-20 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
One big factor for me has been also repo size , because I make games and as you can imagine I need a lot of space. Bit bucket has a limit of 2GB per repo while GitLab has a limit of 10GB, so for me GitLab is far better choice. On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 at 16:31, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > bitbucket of

Re: [Pharo-users] GitLab and Pharo

2016-10-20 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
bitbucket offers infinite private repos too, if you do not want to install a server by your own. Esteban > On 20 Oct 2016, at 14:47, Dimitris Chloupis wrote: > > I have been looking for an alternative to Github to host my private repos, > Github provides only 1 private repo and for more you h

Re: [Pharo-users] GitLab and Pharo

2016-10-20 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
I forgot to add that the limit per website hosted is 1GB On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:47 PM Dimitris Chloupis wrote: > I have been looking for an alternative to Github to host my private repos, > Github provides only 1 private repo and for more you have to pay. So I > found this. > > https://gitlab