Hi Ronie,
Great that you work on a threaded FFI because it is a pain for some
libraries. FFI ODBC for example, works very well but is not usable in
real applications because of sql locks that locks the pharo vm.
I don't like FFI too much, NativeBoost is much better, unfortunately I don't
know abo
This is good news !
Annick
Le 30 oct. 2014 à 23:37, stepharo a écrit :
> Ronie is working on unifying all the api and proposing one syntax mechanism
> for
> - nativeBoost back-end
> - FFI
> and may be Alien
>
> The FFI situation is not good and we know we should improve it.
>
>
>
> Ronie is working on unifying all the api and proposing one syntax
> mechanism for
> - nativeBoost back-end
> - FFI
> and may be Alien
I had a skype session with Eliot the last. He taught me about the callback
mechanism and I am actually going to use Alien for the callbacks, by
ada
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
> That is cool.
>
As long as we keep what is working, ahem, working. I now depend on quite a
couple of FFI related libs.
What I need is an easy FFI wrapping tool, like
https://github.com/ronsaldo/swig. Is UFFI going that way?
Phil
>
> Doru
>
That is cool.
Doru
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:37 PM, stepharo wrote:
> Ronie is working on unifying all the api and proposing one syntax
> mechanism for
> - nativeBoost back-end
> - FFI
> and may be Alien
>
> The FFI situation is not good and we know we should improve it.
>
>
> On
Ronie is working on unifying all the api and proposing one syntax
mechanism for
- nativeBoost back-end
- FFI
and may be Alien
The FFI situation is not good and we know we should improve it.
On 29/10/14 20:18, Thomas Bany wrote:
Oops, sorry, I was misslead by Steph reply.
Some of t
Oops, sorry, I was misslead by Steph reply.
Some of the comments might still hold. For the *time: ’05:45’* code to
work, you would need FFI to handle all the hassle of memory management and
actually allocate the memory for 5 characters and copying it. I never used
FFI but I doubt it does this.
Lo
I can’t use NativeBoost on the Raspberry, I would be glad if I could !!!
Le 29 oct. 2014 à 12:18, stepharo a écrit :
> did you read the NativeBoost tutorial on the PharoForTheEntreprise book?
> If you do please report potential mistakes so that we can improve.
>
>
> On 29/10/14 05:59, Annick
Hi Annick !
I'll explain first why you got the error.
The assignment time: ’05:45’ failed because you tried to put an array of
char (of size 5*sizeof(char)) inside an address.
At some point, you need to allocate the memory that will hold the data. In
your case, you can do it quite easily with th
did you read the NativeBoost tutorial on the PharoForTheEntreprise book?
If you do please report potential mistakes so that we can improve.
On 29/10/14 05:59, Annick Fron wrote:
I I have a C struct with a char*
struct result {
char* time }
I define an ExternalStructure in FFI , with o
10 matches
Mail list logo
