, 2017 16:20, "Andrew Glynn" wrote:
> There's a reason it's referred to by numerous developers as R-HELL.
>
> Andrew Glynn
>
> -Original Message-
>
> *Date*: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 21:46:20 +0800
> *Subject*: Re: [Pharo-users] Deploying on Lin
Why use a special Pharo VM when you can use LibC via UFFI from inside the
image ? UFFI even offers partial wrapper to LibC. We prefer afterall to
move things outside the VM and inside the image as much as we can to offers
us a greater deal of flexibility.
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 12:45 PM Cyril Ferl
Le 05/10/2017 à 15:46, Holger Freyther a écrit :
>
> Hi!
>
>
> for a brief moment you really scared me. I thought you referred to RedHat
> Linux 6 which was released in 1999 but you are referring to Red Hat
> Enterprise Linux (RHEL).
>
> As it turns out we have "latest" (as soon as a commit i
There's a reason it's referred to by numerous developers as R-HELL.
Andrew Glynn
-Original Message-
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 21:46:20 +0800
Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Deploying on Linux with LibC version < 2.15
To: bruce.on...@pckswarms.ch, Any question about pharo is welc
RedHat < 7.0 still uses libc 2.12 as far as I'm aware. Pharo 5 has a
downloadable version that works on that OS. OEL with the UEK has an
updated libc.
Andrew Glynn
openmastery.org
-Original Message-
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 11:43:07 +0200
Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Deploying on Li
Le 05/10/2017 à 16:29, Holger Freyther a écrit :
> I don't have a RHEL subscription but I assumed they are similar but
> OBS even produces RHEL packages:
>
> https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/devel:/languages:/pharo:/stable/RHEL_6/
>
>
> Not sure. Even the RHEL documentation mentions -
Any developer can get a free RHEL license and a dev account for accessing
docs and what not. This includes CVE fixes etc.
CentOS is close but not always the same. e.g. no security fixes are
included vs RHEL when updating (even if the flag is accepted).
I am going next week to the RedHat forum in
> On 5. Oct 2017, at 22:22, Cyril Ferlicot wrote:
>
>
> Your instructions describes the steps for CentOS 6.x. Are they the
> exact same steps for RHEL6?
I don't have a RHEL subscription but I assumed they are similar but
OBS even produces RHEL packages:
https://download.opensuse.org/reposito
On 10/5/17, Holger Freyther wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>
> for a brief moment you really scared me. I thought you referred to RedHat
> Linux 6 which was released in 1999 but you are referring to Red Hat
> Enterprise Linux (RHEL).
>
> As it turns out we have "latest" (as soon as a commit is made to
> pharo-v
> On 5. Oct 2017, at 18:08, Bruce O'Neel wrote:
>
> Hi,
Hi!
> Well, our redhat 6.9 systems have 2.12, so, that qualifies.
>
> And yes, we still have RedHat 6, and 6.9 was released only 6 months ago! It
> will finish extended support in a mind-blowing 7 more years in 2024.
>
> Redhat 5, st
CentOS6.9 for one.
Phil
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Holger Freyther wrote:
>
> > On 4. Oct 2017, at 17:39, Cyril Ferlicot
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am migrating some applications from Pharo 4 to Pharo 6. The new
> > deployment of those applications needs to work on linux with LibC <
Hi,
Well, our redhat 6.9 systems have 2.12, so, that qualifies.
And yes, we still have RedHat 6, and 6.9 was released only 6 months ago! It
will finish extended support in a mind-blowing 7 more years in 2024.
Redhat 5, still supported for another 3 years till 2020 has glibc 2.5.
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Holger Freyther wrote:
>
>
> Which OS has such old versions of LibC? Which LSB standard does it support?
>
Hi,
This is RedHat. I don't have the right to give more info than the fact
it is a RedHat with a LibC version < 2.15.
I don't know for the LSB support. I ca
> On 4. Oct 2017, at 17:39, Cyril Ferlicot wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am migrating some applications from Pharo 4 to Pharo 6. The new
> deployment of those applications needs to work on linux with LibC <
> 2.15. With Pharo 4 there was a special VM[1]. I do not see such VM for
> Pharo 6.
Which OS has
14 matches
Mail list logo
