Yes I see. I will keep thinking about it.
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:58:26 +0100, Tudor Girba
wrote:
Hi,
On Dec 21, 2016, at 3:05 PM, stepharong wrote:
Hi Alex,
Following the design proposed by Stef, in your case you would use a
different collection.
Doru I have multiple missingVa
Hi,
> On Dec 21, 2016, at 3:05 PM, stepharong wrote:
>
>
>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> Following the design proposed by Stef, in your case you would use a
>> different collection.
>
> Doru I have multiple missingValue so that they embed their own strategy.
> Now I do not know for the scenario of alex
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:05:32 +0100, Tudor Girba
wrote:
Hi,
I forgot to mention that another option I played with was to always use
a metric object, and never numbers. So, numberOfLinesOfCode would return
a MetricValue. I think the same idea is present in acqoncagua.
Yes in fact may be
Hi Alex,
Following the design proposed by Stef, in your case you would use a
different collection.
Doru I have multiple missingValue so that they embed their own strategy.
Now I do not know for the scenario of alex.
Cheers,
Doru
On Dec 21, 2016, at 8:13 AM, Alexandre Bergel
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 08:13:19 +0100, Alexandre Bergel
wrote:
Hi Stef,
You are raising an interesting point to discuss. This MissingValue is
indeed better than having -1
Something to keep in mind: it may be that one would like to focus on the
missing value and not really the value.
can y
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 08:07:39 +0100, Tudor Girba
wrote:
Hi,
MissingValue (or NoValue) is definitely the way to go. The
UniformOrderedCollection is an interesting idea, too. We had a NoValue
like solution a long time ago but we discarded because we missed the
idea around collections. It
Hi,
I forgot to mention that another option I played with was to always use a
metric object, and never numbers. So, numberOfLinesOfCode would return a
MetricValue. I think the same idea is present in acqoncagua.
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
> On 21 Dec 20
Hi Alex,
Following the design proposed by Stef, in your case you would use a different
collection.
Cheers,
Doru
> On Dec 21, 2016, at 8:13 AM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>
> Hi Stef,
>
> You are raising an interesting point to discuss. This MissingValue is indeed
> better than having -1
> Som
Hi Stef,
You are raising an interesting point to discuss. This MissingValue is indeed
better than having -1
Something to keep in mind: it may be that one would like to focus on the
missing value and not really the value.
Consider:
> testCollect
>
> | uarray collected |
> uarray :=
Hi,
MissingValue (or NoValue) is definitely the way to go. The
UniformOrderedCollection is an interesting idea, too. We had a NoValue like
solution a long time ago but we discarded because we missed the idea around
collections. It would be really cool to have this working.
Cheers,
Doru
> On
So basically you are trying to deal with missing values in collections.
People working with R or Python data analytics framework made some
ways to work with specific data structures called dataframes
where you can have some missing values.
For example you may have a look here:
http://pandas.pydat
11 matches
Mail list logo
